Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Czar
Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Czar
The country is not secure, the UN cant do anything about that so they cant do anything else because all depends on security.Originally posted by: charrison
Originally posted by: Czar
actually no,Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Agreed. But could it have happened in eight months if we had planned better and if we had allowed other countries to participate? That's the real question.Originally posted by: charrison
No one is going to be able to miracle new power generation over night. THis is going to take time to sort out.
About 3 months ago, it was reported that Iraq was producing 4000 MW and prewar levels were 4400MW, However at that time demand was 6000MW. I doubt at this point demand is going down. It will take time to get things where the power is reliable 24/7 all over the country. The needed infrastructure does not happen over night.
Maybe it could have been done faster. ANYTHING can be done better/faster/cheaper looking at it from hind-sight. But the simple truth is - others didn't want to take part - they CHOSE not to be involved. I'd say we've done quite alot in the short time our coalition has been on the ground - inspite of the pocketed resistance.
So yes - the real question is - why didn't the other countries participate when it would have been better for the Iraqis? Was it politics? Old Contracts? Rubber spine? Remember - we didn't say anyone couldn't join the coalition - they chose not to.
CkG
they wanted to be under UN control, and the US wanted either the UN or the other countries being under US control, so they chose and the US chose
And the UN chose to leave. IF the UN were in control, things would be much worse. They have have shown no backbone recently.
And as you should know by know, the UN is not an entity in its own, it is just a reprisentative of all the member countries.
Do you have a crystal ball?
So if the UN cant do anything until it is secure, what could they have done? Only the US and supporting countries has had the fortitude to get the job done.
Like I said before and should be bloody obvios by now, under the UN falls all member countries, including the US, France, Russia, Germany and so on, a change would change the authority in Iraq under the UN, forces would include US and more supporting countries than the US has now alone.
How does this crystal ball of yours work?
Like I said, the UN has not had the fortitude to step in help.
The UN has not been given the opertunity because the US does not want the UN there. The US wants UN operations in Iraq under US rule, this does not comply with the UN as an international entity.
I must go now, while I'm gone please share some information on this crystal ball of yours since you have so many facts on what might have been and what might be.
