Went to vote this morning before work

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,824
6,374
126
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

Unemployment is going to be > 7% with the current policies.

Yes, I think its around 7%-8%. Think Obama can beat it? We'll see. I don't need Obama to turn water into wine, just improve the economy for everyone -- esp., the poor folks who get hurt the most in an economic downturn.

6.1% approx right now, but growing.
 

techs

Lifer
Sep 26, 2000
28,559
4
0
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
That's going to make people not want to vote. I want to vote, but I really don't have that kind of time to wait in line (was going to go last week, but gf had a death in the family that kind of took away from that).

It dramatically makes it difficult for working class people to vote. In fact, in states which don't have early voting, it makes it nearly impossible for millions of people to vote.

aren't workers paid anyway? I know there are workers who have to punch-in, but I thought even this was covered in the law?

If it's illegal to withhold an employee from voting, there should be adequate compensation for the employee's lost time, no?

Uh, no. You can legally be fired for missing work to vote. You can legally not be paid for missing work to vote. You cannot use that you were "voting" as an excuse.

 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

Unemployment is going to be > 7% with the current policies.

Yes, I think its around 7%-8%. Think Obama can beat it? We'll see. I don't need Obama to turn water into wine, just improve the economy for everyone -- esp., the poor folks who get hurt the most in an economic downturn.

6.1% approx right now, but growing.

...and will not magically change after Obama becomes Pres either. The fruits of his labor will take time to be realized. Of course, tons of people are just going to start blaming him for all sorts of problems and figures which have nothing to do with him at all.
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,946
31,483
146
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
That's going to make people not want to vote. I want to vote, but I really don't have that kind of time to wait in line (was going to go last week, but gf had a death in the family that kind of took away from that).

It dramatically makes it difficult for working class people to vote. In fact, in states which don't have early voting, it makes it nearly impossible for millions of people to vote.

aren't workers paid anyway? I know there are workers who have to punch-in, but I thought even this was covered in the law?

If it's illegal to withhold an employee from voting, there should be adequate compensation for the employee's lost time, no?

Uh, no. You can legally be fired for missing work to vote. You can legally not be paid for missing work to vote. You cannot use that you were "voting" as an excuse.

wait...what? link me please.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,873
6,784
126
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

I can't wait for you to be among them.

Like most economic downturns, its the lower classes that get hurt the most. I'm doing ok, odds are I wouldn't get hurt too badly - hopefully. In any case, I notice most Obama supporters tend to be worse off. I feel for those people. IMHO, it is them that will get hurt the most. Oh well, you touch a power line, you get shocked.

Hope old "moonbeam" is doing well, now. If not, IMHO, its going to get a lot worse for you.

Don't tell anybody but there's nothing in this world that I want and I can't even remember the last time I bought anything just for me. Oh yeah, I bought Spore and threw it away. I couldn't upload the patch, hehe. Bubye!

Oh my Beloved, wherever I look it appears to be Thou.
 

woodie1

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2000
5,947
0
0
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: DisgruntledVirus
That's going to make people not want to vote. I want to vote, but I really don't have that kind of time to wait in line (was going to go last week, but gf had a death in the family that kind of took away from that).

It dramatically makes it difficult for working class people to vote. In fact, in states which don't have early voting, it makes it nearly impossible for millions of people to vote.

aren't workers paid anyway? I know there are workers who have to punch-in, but I thought even this was covered in the law?

If it's illegal to withhold an employee from voting, there should be adequate compensation for the employee's lost time, no?

Uh, no. You can legally be fired for missing work to vote. You can legally not be paid for missing work to vote. You cannot use that you were "voting" as an excuse.

NOT TRUE. Most states require that workers are allowed time off to vote. You may not get paid though.

 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,839
2,625
136
It's an absolute disgrace that our voting system is intentionally made unwieldy and cumbersome and wasteful of voter's time. I see reports on TV of waits of up to eight hours for EARLY voting and dread what will happen tomorrow in the 16 states that don't have early voting, like mine.

Voting in the US should not use as it's model shopping under the old USSR system.

That said, I have no tolerance whatsoever for people who whine about the inconvenience and burden. Many of the preceeding generations of my family paid with blood to preserve our democracy, the least we can do is put up with a day's inconvenience.

We the people should, however, DEMAND that our politicians actually fix this system so it is both honest and user friendly, instead of seeking to protect the big two political parties' turf. 2000 was a wakeup call that has been derailed.
 

Lemon law

Lifer
Nov 6, 2005
20,984
3
0
I had the option to vote early. I instead will vote tomorrow. And because I live in a rural area, I have never seen long lines at the polls. But with the enthusiasm, I could get burned.

In terms of encouraging early voting, I have mixed feelings. I think it will help reduce poll congestion in urban areas and have some other benefits.

But I think we should wait for a while after this election before forming an opinion on the pro's and cons of encouraging massive early voting. I am presently more worried about the outcome of tomorrows election to think far into the future.

After all, there will be 76 days left of GWB.
 

Ferocious

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2000
4,584
2
71
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP

Not necessarily.

There were long lines here in Ohio in 2004. I live in a county that is traditionally red, voted red in 2004, and had unusually long lines in 2004.

 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

Unemployment is going to be > 7% with the current policies.

Yes, I think its around 7%-8%. Think Obama can beat it? We'll see. I don't need Obama to turn water into wine, just improve the economy for everyone -- esp., the poor folks who get hurt the most in an economic downturn.

6.1% approx right now, but growing.

...and will not magically change after Obama becomes Pres either. The fruits of his labor will take time to be realized. Of course, tons of people are just going to start blaming him for all sorts of problems and figures which have nothing to do with him at all.

I'll give him a year... That's a quarter of his term. I have a feeling he wouldn't be able to reverse it - but instead make it worse. Also, to make it a bit easier on Obama -- lets just go with the 7%-8% figure; I have a feeling there's going to be a lot of voters with "buyers remorse" who wouldn't have any jobs anymore... but who knows.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
...and will not magically change after Obama becomes Pres either. The fruits of his labor will take time to be realized. Of course, tons of people are just going to start blaming him for all sorts of problems and figures which have nothing to do with him at all.

I'll give him a year... That's a quarter of his term. I have a feeling he wouldn't be able to reverse it - but instead make it worse. Also, to make it a bit easier on Obama -- lets just go with the 7%-8% figure; I have a feeling there's going to be a lot of voters with "buyers remorse" who wouldn't have any jobs anymore... but who knows.

Dude, even McCain is claiming that the bulk of this problem will take 10 years to truly realize the solution. No one can change almost a decade of failed economic policy within one year.

Are you trying to say that you are going to do nothing but look at the unemployment numbers without analyzing in anyway why those numbers are the way that they are an immediately blame it on Obama? What sense does that make? How does that help us fix the problem?
 

Corn

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 1999
6,390
29
91
Originally posted by: Moonbeam
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

I can't wait for you to be among them.

Obviously you have not evolved above your own self-hatred. What a fraud.

 

sportage

Lifer
Feb 1, 2008
11,492
3,163
136
I see there will be a push in congress to make early voting national law.
GOOD NEWS for us all!!!!
Because I see two issues coming on this election day.

One? states with-out early voting WILL SEE THE MESS FROM HELL!!!
With loooooooooooooooooooong lines.

Two? polls will be forced to stay open A LOT LONGER than planned.
As I understand it, if you are in line to vote and got in line before closing time,
then YOU GET TO VOTE until every one in line gets thru.

So if the polls close at 9pm, and the line is still 8 blocks long of voters that all got
there before 9pm, then the polling place MUST stay open.
If that happens, long lines at closing time, then I can already see a long late election night coming.
Not in close results, but in polls still open past closing time. Thus not reporting until hours after closing time. Long result delays from states.
After all those voters in line get thru.

Especially in the PENN state. Its going to be a looooooong night!!!!


?????
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: sportage
I see there will be a push in congress to make early voting national law.
GOOD NEWS for us all!!!!
Because I see two issues coming on this election day.

One? states with-out early voting WILL SEE THE MESS FROM HELL!!!
With loooooooooooooooooooong lines.

Two? polls will be forced to stay open A LOT LONGER than planned.
As I understand it, if you are in line to vote and got in line before closing time,
then YOU GET TO VOTE until every one in line gets thru.

So if the polls close at 9pm, and the line is still 8 blocks long of voters that all got
there before 9pm, then the polling place MUST stay open.
If that happens, long lines at closing time, then I can already see a long late election night coming.
Not in close results, but in polls still open past closing time. Thus not reporting until hours after closing time. Long result delays from states.
After all those voters in line get thru.

Especially in the PENN state. Its going to be a looooooong night!!!!


?????


It would be kind of amusing if I woke up the next morning on Nov. 5th at 6am, checked the news, and found out that a results still are not completed because people are still waiting in lines. I don't think that will actually happen mind you, but the thought is funny. :laugh:
 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
...and will not magically change after Obama becomes Pres either. The fruits of his labor will take time to be realized. Of course, tons of people are just going to start blaming him for all sorts of problems and figures which have nothing to do with him at all.

I'll give him a year... That's a quarter of his term. I have a feeling he wouldn't be able to reverse it - but instead make it worse. Also, to make it a bit easier on Obama -- lets just go with the 7%-8% figure; I have a feeling there's going to be a lot of voters with "buyers remorse" who wouldn't have any jobs anymore... but who knows.

Dude, even McCain is claiming that the bulk of this problem will take 10 years to truly realize the solution. No one can change almost a decade of failed economic policy within one year.

Are you trying to say that you are going to do nothing but look at the unemployment numbers without analyzing in anyway why those numbers are the way that they are an immediately blame it on Obama? What sense does that make? How does that help us fix the problem?



10 years!!!!! That's a long time. I feel the voting pop. will not give Obama anymore time than 1 year (not to mention 10) -- especially if they noticed that the jobless rate climbing ever so higher than it ever was during the "hated" Bush reign.

1 year after all is a quarter of Obama's term and he does have a liberal house. Thats four business quarters -- lets see how "sharing the wealth" affects the economy. Remember folks, the target is to be better than 7-8 % unemployment rate ;-)
 

miketheidiot

Lifer
Sep 3, 2004
11,060
1
0
Originally posted by: alchemize
Just prepping us for the lines for toilet paper, comrade? Sorry...couldn't resist.

This is a great thing, we need higher turnout.

Techs and Jpeyton - you need to get your talking points straight on if this is a bad or good thing. Can't have party disunity. I tend to go with jpeytons view. Most republicans work for a living.

so do most democrats, but long lines hurt dems since dems are more urban were the lines are generally longer
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,824
6,374
126
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
...and will not magically change after Obama becomes Pres either. The fruits of his labor will take time to be realized. Of course, tons of people are just going to start blaming him for all sorts of problems and figures which have nothing to do with him at all.

I'll give him a year... That's a quarter of his term. I have a feeling he wouldn't be able to reverse it - but instead make it worse. Also, to make it a bit easier on Obama -- lets just go with the 7%-8% figure; I have a feeling there's going to be a lot of voters with "buyers remorse" who wouldn't have any jobs anymore... but who knows.

Dude, even McCain is claiming that the bulk of this problem will take 10 years to truly realize the solution. No one can change almost a decade of failed economic policy within one year.

Are you trying to say that you are going to do nothing but look at the unemployment numbers without analyzing in anyway why those numbers are the way that they are an immediately blame it on Obama? What sense does that make? How does that help us fix the problem?



10 years!!!!! That's a long time. I feel the voting pop. will not give Obama anymore time than 1 year (not to mention 10) -- especially if they noticed that the jobless rate climbing ever so higher than it ever was during the "hated" Bush reign.

1 year after all is a quarter of Obama's term and he does have a liberal house. Thats four business quarters -- lets see how "sharing the wealth" affects the economy. Remember folks, the target is to be better than 7-8 % unemployment rate ;-)

Bush's failure is just getting started.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: Dari
Oklahoma? Must be McCain's people.

From looking at the sheets that list your name, party, precinct and ballot type you have to sign before you get your ballot it was easily 20 to 1 in the Democrats favor.
 

shiner

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
17,112
1
0
Originally posted by: techs
that's a freakin' disgrace.

They were moving people through as quickly as they could. The place I'm speaking of is also not the only place people can go to vote early. There are multiple places they can go an from what I've been told they are all experiencing huge amounts of early voters.
 

eleison

Golden Member
Mar 29, 2006
1,319
0
0
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
...and will not magically change after Obama becomes Pres either. The fruits of his labor will take time to be realized. Of course, tons of people are just going to start blaming him for all sorts of problems and figures which have nothing to do with him at all.

I'll give him a year... That's a quarter of his term. I have a feeling he wouldn't be able to reverse it - but instead make it worse. Also, to make it a bit easier on Obama -- lets just go with the 7%-8% figure; I have a feeling there's going to be a lot of voters with "buyers remorse" who wouldn't have any jobs anymore... but who knows.

Dude, even McCain is claiming that the bulk of this problem will take 10 years to truly realize the solution. No one can change almost a decade of failed economic policy within one year.

Are you trying to say that you are going to do nothing but look at the unemployment numbers without analyzing in anyway why those numbers are the way that they are an immediately blame it on Obama? What sense does that make? How does that help us fix the problem?



10 years!!!!! That's a long time. I feel the voting pop. will not give Obama anymore time than 1 year (not to mention 10) -- especially if they noticed that the jobless rate climbing ever so higher than it ever was during the "hated" Bush reign.

1 year after all is a quarter of Obama's term and he does have a liberal house. Thats four business quarters -- lets see how "sharing the wealth" affects the economy. Remember folks, the target is to be better than 7-8 % unemployment rate ;-)

Bush's failure is just getting started.

In about an blink of an eye, so will Obama's presidency.
 
May 16, 2000
13,522
0
0
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

Well around here we're at 10%+ under Bushes great policies. Sure it could get worse, but right now there's a lot of room for improvement.
 

Xavier434

Lifer
Oct 14, 2002
10,373
1
0
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Dude, even McCain is claiming that the bulk of this problem will take 10 years to truly realize the solution. No one can change almost a decade of failed economic policy within one year.

Are you trying to say that you are going to do nothing but look at the unemployment numbers without analyzing in anyway why those numbers are the way that they are an immediately blame it on Obama? What sense does that make? How does that help us fix the problem?



10 years!!!!! That's a long time. I feel the voting pop. will not give Obama anymore time than 1 year (not to mention 10) -- especially if they noticed that the jobless rate climbing ever so higher than it ever was during the "hated" Bush reign.

1 year after all is a quarter of Obama's term and he does have a liberal house. Thats four business quarters -- lets see how "sharing the wealth" affects the economy. Remember folks, the target is to be better than 7-8 % unemployment rate ;-)

The problem is that things need time to naturally change and progress too. The government can only do so much. They can pave the path and guide the country in a certain direction, but the markets and world econ will need time to adjust and react. I am talking the big picture here though. Not just one slice of the pie which is unemployment rates. Both McCain and Obama have been tossing the 10 year number around when it comes to the major bulk of their plans to really flourish and reach its peak of success.

I'm sorry you are impatient but that is just the reality of the situation. One can hope for quicker resolutions and they most certainly can happen, but it will not just be up to the the US government. SO MANY things influence the progression of such changes.
 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
Originally posted by: Ferocious
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP

Not necessarily.

There were long lines here in Ohio in 2004. I live in a county that is traditionally red, voted red in 2004, and had unusually long lines in 2004.

Don't expect to actually respond when he's wrong.


Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: eleison
Originally posted by: jpeyton
High turnout = poison for the GOP


Yea, its going to be 4 years of Obama. IMHO, can't wait for the higher unemployment rates that his policies bring.

Well around here we're at 10%+ under Bushes great policies. Sure it could get worse, but right now there's a lot of room for improvement.

Or how about 6.1% and we've certainly been a lot worse.

Unemployment, 1948-2008