purbeast0
No Lifer
- Sep 13, 2001
- 53,660
- 6,536
- 126
Originally posted by: AMCRambler
Originally posted by: mugs
I don't know why I'd feel entitled to watch a game without interruptions just because I paid for a ticket. They do the same thing at hockey games, probably basketball games too. It hasn't ever bothered me when I'm at a game and they take a TV timeout, I just talk to my wife. Millions of people watching on TV vs tens of thousands watching in the stands... meh.
Well I'd agree if tickets didn't cost so much. I checked my stub and it's $75. I had said a hundred, so that was wrong. If you paid $75 to go see a music concert, wouldn't you be little pissed if they stopped for 5 to 6 minutes between songs and just stood there on the stage looking dumb? The whole well I'll just talk to me wife thing is fine but you didn't pay $75 to talk to your wife. You paid $75 to watch a game.
Ok maybe they make more money by selling advertising on tv, but I'd wager the amount they get from ticket sales, consessions, souvenirs, in stadium advertising and so forth is a fair chunk of change. Kind of a kick in the teeth to the real fans of your team if you ask me. If it weren't for the die hard fans that make football what it is and go out and freeze their butt off to see those games in person, the NFL would not exist.
if you are going to compare a conert to a sporting event, atleast compre it to a PPV sporting event, such as boxing, which has no commercial breaks at all and is non-stop.
if you are going to compare a concert to the NFL you have to compare one that is on regular broadcast TV, where yes, there is pauses while they show network commercials.
meltdown is right ... worst ... analogy ... EVER
