Thoughts?
Who is going to take care of all these "babies up for adoption?"
Who is going to take care of all these "babies up for adoption?"
There are hundreds of thousands of people looking to adopt white, healthy, genetically tested, non-GMO breast fed infants who do it in other countries because babies in the US might be pre-destined to stealing cars or have some weird poverty gene.
FTFY
How about worry about the largest welfare, Big Business/Corp., before worrying about the pennies below it.
Why can't we do both? Can't multitask or something?
I think people who get pregnant while receiving welfare or other kinds of government assistance should be given a choice:
1) Give the baby up for adoption
2) Have an abortion
3) Keep the baby, but give up rights to ever receive welfare again
Thoughts?
I think people who get pregnant while receiving welfare,,,,,
Thoughts?
How about worry about the largest welfare, Big Business/Corp., before worrying about the pennies below it.
If you are so worried about corporate welfare perhaps you should start a thread where you can present your thoughts on the matter?
2) Have an abortion
Oh, excuse me for not realizing you are trying to be serious with this thread. It's an easy mistake to make, I try to give people the benefit of the doubt when their post is filled with ignorance.This. I'm all for ending corporate welfare, along with finding better ways to manage social welfare.
I don't have a problem giving welfare to people who are truly trying to make their lives better. If you make the decision to have a baby while taking welfare, you obviously don't fall into that category, and it's in the best interest of all parties to take the child.
Gay couples![]()
Oh, excuse me for not realizing you are trying to be serious with this thread. It's an easy mistake to make, I try to give people the benefit of the doubt when their post is filled with ignorance.
Here is your serious answer as to why you are retarded:
1) Good idea, lets give the Feds more power to take children away from their parents.
2) Good idea, lets give the Feds power to force people to get abortions. Nevermind the fact that more than half the nation thinks abortion is murder.
3) Welfare's primary goal is making sure the child doesn't suffer for the behavior of the parent. Nutrition is extremely important to early childhood development. Cutting welfare will result in even more developmentally challenged kids.
Please take some time to reflect on why you are so easily manipulated into believing that policies that are bad for you are actually good for you.
LOLFTFY
The roll-out of Obamacare suggests we can't even singletask.Why can't we do both? Can't multitask or something?
I think people who get pregnant while receiving welfare or other kinds of government assistance should be given a choice:
1) Give the baby up for adoption
2) Have an abortion
3) Keep the baby, but give up rights to ever receive welfare again
Thoughts?
There are hundreds of thousands of people looking to adopt infants who do it in other countries because of the outrageous adoption costs in the US.
There are long waiting lists to adopt healthy infants.
I think people who get pregnant while receiving welfare or other kinds of government assistance should be given a choice:
1) Give the baby up for adoption
2) Have an abortion
3) Keep the baby, but give up rights to ever receive welfare again
Thoughts?
No. Tax-payer funded abortion is immoral unless it is forced on poor people. They aren't allowed to choose it, we are allowed to require it. Same for contraception.Free State funded contraception and abortion?
Don't ask how to put out the fire, prevent the fire.