Originally posted by: Greyd
My mind was wandering and I started thinking about this as I was driving the other day. Can a person have two seperate health insurance policies? If they can, can they utilize both for taking care of medical bills,etc?
Yeah im bored.
Originally posted by: Greyd
My mind was wandering and I started thinking about this as I was driving the other day. Can a person have two seperate health insurance policies? If they can, can they utilize both for taking care of medical bills,etc?
Yeah im bored.
Originally posted by: Hoober
Originally posted by: Greyd
My mind was wandering and I started thinking about this as I was driving the other day. Can a person have two seperate health insurance policies? If they can, can they utilize both for taking care of medical bills,etc?
Yeah im bored.
I don't see why not, but why would you want to pay for 2?
Originally posted by: Greyd
My mind was wandering and I started thinking about this as I was driving the other day. Can a person have two seperate health insurance policies? If they can, can they utilize both for taking care of medical bills,etc?
Originally posted by: ATLien247
Well, the way it's supposed to work is that your secondary insurance should pick up the amount in excess of your primary insurance. Whether that really happens or not is based upon the fine print for each policy, and seemingly, the predilection of the insurance company to screw over everyone.
Originally posted by: kranky
Today all insurers have "coordination of benefits" clauses. That means the companies will make sure only one of them pays for something, not both. You could still choose which plan to use if it made any difference in coverage.
I had a co-worker way back whose daughter was standing too close to the road waiting to cross, and a truck's side mirror hit the girl in the head. The medical bills were staggering, over $200K. Both parents worked and both had insurance, and through some loophole that used to exist prior to coordination of benefits, they were able to submit the bills to both companies, and pocketed the extra $200K.
Originally posted by: kranky
Today all insurers have "coordination of benefits" clauses. That means the companies will make sure only one of them pays for something, not both. You could still choose which plan to use if it made any difference in coverage.
I had a co-worker way back whose daughter was standing too close to the road waiting to cross, and a truck's side mirror hit the girl in the head. The medical bills were staggering, over $200K. Both parents worked and both had insurance, and through some loophole that used to exist prior to coordination of benefits, they were able to submit the bills to both companies, and pocketed the extra $200K.
Originally posted by: Armitage
Originally posted by: kranky
Today all insurers have "coordination of benefits" clauses. That means the companies will make sure only one of them pays for something, not both. You could still choose which plan to use if it made any difference in coverage.
I had a co-worker way back whose daughter was standing too close to the road waiting to cross, and a truck's side mirror hit the girl in the head. The medical bills were staggering, over $200K. Both parents worked and both had insurance, and through some loophole that used to exist prior to coordination of benefits, they were able to submit the bills to both companies, and pocketed the extra $200K.
Wow ... that smells alot like fraud to me.
