Bowfinger
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2002
- 15,776
- 392
- 126
Ignorance is bliss, Cad. It is a true statement, and you know it from earlier comments. Then again, honesty isn't always your strong suit either -- better than Heartsurgeon's perhaps, but you've shown great promise in twisting, diverting, and denying the truth.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Since i'm in a GREAT mood- I'll just say...Buahahahahahaha.....hahahahahahaha!!!!!!!
CkG
Heartsurgeon's comment was a vile lie. By appearing to support it, you sully yourself.
FelixDeCat
Lifer
- Aug 4, 2000
- 31,081
- 2,707
- 126
Three cheers for George Bush & Dick Cheney!!!
WMD - check
Free Iraq - check
Handover Power June 2004 - (to be checked)
WMD - check
Free Iraq - check
Handover Power June 2004 - (to be checked)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA...tears streaming down face...can't catch my breath...side hurts from laughing.....almost as funny as calling NPR "moderate", or Kerry (a highly decorated Vietnam Veteran) "mainstream".
I'm not sure how it's possible to take that "out of context."
Heads up..here are the liberal talking points..
WMD'S?
"one doesn't count"
"doesn't count unless it kills tens of thousands"
"the CIA/Bush/Rumsfeld planted it"
"WE gave then to Saddam"
"the Israelis have em? so what if Saddam does to"
at this point even if we found a dozen Nukes the libs would still make it Bush's fault..
It just doesn't matter to the libs...they are Bush Haters........
CADsortaGUY
Lifer
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Ignorance is bliss, Cad. It is a true statement, and you know it from earlier comments. Then again, honesty isn't always your strong suit either -- better than Heartsurgeon's perhaps, but you've shown great promise in twisting, diverting, and denying the truth.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Since i'm in a GREAT mood
CkG
Heartsurgeon's comment was a vile lie. By appearing to support it, you sully yourself.
Oh, don't get me wrong - I was only commenting on the part I quoted. I was laughing so hard after reading that I not only spilled my Pepsi all over, I couldn't finish reading your post.
Maybe I'll get to it later tonight when I get home. Work is getting busy, and despite sudheer anne's tauntings, I may not get to everything like I used to be able to do. But the great thing is - things slow down after labor day for us(usually) so I'll have ALL fall to be here destroying the arguments of the left Back to work...
..."independents like me"....
hehe hahaha...CkG
Did this one origin-unknown artillery shell that was used in an improvised explosive device justify going to war with Iraq? Is this the find that backs up all of the pre-war statements by the administration? Did this small amount of WMD material threaten us with mass casualties? Do we even know where it came from yet?
I know the mustard gas components were completely inert due to the length they've been stored.
As for the sarin, while a little over a gallon could fit inside an artillary shell that size, it's unknown how much was really in there. From FoxNews.com:
So again I ask, is this the "big find" of WMDs the administration has been looking for?
I know the mustard gas components were completely inert due to the length they've been stored.
As for the sarin, while a little over a gallon could fit inside an artillary shell that size, it's unknown how much was really in there. From FoxNews.com:
So again I ask, is this the "big find" of WMDs the administration has been looking for?
Bowfinger
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2002
- 15,776
- 392
- 126
More spinning, but the fact remains, you know full well I made a truthful statement. As I've pointed out many times before, the issue is that you Bush fan-boys are so blindly partisan, your little heads simply cannot comprehend that anyone disapproves of Bush-lite on his merits. Your whole, tenuous grip on reality (such as it is) is based on the belief that only thems durn tree-hugging, baby-killing, commie-libs could possibly not worship Bush as much as you.Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
..."independents like me"....
CkG
You are completely wrong, of course, and that is one of your greatest weaknesses. You have no ability to be objective about Bush, or even to acknowledge your bias. It has become your religion. Bush is God. God is great. Only the heathens, i.e., liberals, believe otherwise.
Different strokes ... Bleat on.
Bowfinger
Lifer
- Nov 17, 2002
- 15,776
- 392
- 126
Perhaps you're having a heart attack. You should see a doctor. A real doctor.
As I pointed out to Cad, my statement in true. The fact you can't accept it is your problem.
Pity, I've explained it twice. Perhaps your reading skills are as poor as your feckless leader's. More likely, it's your honesty skills which are lacking.
Bleat on. You have no remaining credibility to lose anyway.
Isn't context a very important thing to consider when quoting someone? CAD, would you mind explaining the importance of context to heartsurgeon?
Well Cad, the entire world is a tree-hugging liberal socialist on welfare compared to you. I guess you're just not a very good comparison when measuring such things. Hell, I've voted independent in 2 of the last 3 presidential elections. I don't know if that makes me "independent" or not, but perhaps Bow thinks he is? Do you have some evidence to the contrary?Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
..."independents like me"....
CkG
Agreed.
Also, I'm an Independent too.
Of course I doubt that fits in with wacko Cad's B&W view of the World. :roll:
Edit: Registered Independent, that is.
geez, I come back to this thread a couple hours later and the conservatives are still cheering over the injuries of American solders. If you're hunting for a stockpile of guns and you get shot by one, that does not mean you found them. I'm not going to bother joining into your crazy arguments over what a 'WMD' is because 1) I'll let our soldiers do their work and uncover all there is to be uncovered before I judge and 2) my straightforward posts will probably get ignored once again. :|
Edit: If anyone of conservative standing could stop going bonkers over this infantile 'What makes a WMD' crap and address the questions I've placed in this thread, I'd be most appreciative.
Edit: If anyone of conservative standing could stop going bonkers over this infantile 'What makes a WMD' crap and address the questions I've placed in this thread, I'd be most appreciative.
LOL!
Now you're running away with your tail tucked between your legs.
Certainly there will be a news article dated 5/17/2004. Go ahead and post one of them.
Go ahead.
I'm waiting.
And I'm not holding my breath.
linky
FYI Dennis Ross served in the Clinton White House.
at a minimum, these findings prove that Saddam retained at least some of the WMD's he was obligated to destroy at the behest of the U.N. The magnitude what he retained is yet unknown.
reminds me of that old joke about being "a lttle bit" pregnant.
liberals are not obligate to post in this thread if it causes them dyspepsia or irritability....
suspicion??? Suspicion?
Whatever happened to the incontrovertible evidence, heartsurgeon?
Whatever happened to Rumsfeld's claims that he knew where they were?
Whatever happened to Powell's chart with the arrows pointing to the chemical weapons??
Whatever happened to the incontrovertible evidence, heartsurgeon?
Whatever happened to Rumsfeld's claims that he knew where they were?
Whatever happened to Powell's chart with the arrows pointing to the chemical weapons??
heartsurgeon,
"at a minimum, these findings prove that Saddam retained at least some of the WMD's he was obligated to destroy at the behest of the U.N."
Incorrect. We do not know where the shells are from. They could be from other countries. They could have left Iraq a long time ago and returned. Who knows. I suggest you don't jump to conclusions.
"at a minimum, these findings prove that Saddam retained at least some of the WMD's he was obligated to destroy at the behest of the U.N."
Incorrect. We do not know where the shells are from. They could be from other countries. They could have left Iraq a long time ago and returned. Who knows. I suggest you don't jump to conclusions.
The reason behind asking the "what makes a WMD" is an effort to determine what exactly what will satisfythe libs that "they" have been found.
in fact, if you read the liberal posts, "no amount" of WMD's will suffice to convince them that Bush has made the only decisions a thoughtful man could make, in the defense of his country.
the closest you get to an amount or a description of a WMD that is a serious problem for the U.S., is multiple nukes.....possibly an ocean full of Sarin might suffice.
gee, you know they are weapons of MASs destruction..you just don't need that many.
heartsurgeon, to justify Bush's terrible decisions you would also need to show that the WMDs were a threat to the US and explain why we don't attack all the other countries that have WMDs. Also, you would want to explain why the US didn't invade Iraq in the 80s after they used WMDs on its people.
ok here ya go
"One official told Fox News that a conventional 155-mm shell could hold as much as "two to five" liters of sarin"
even though its obvious ill go ahead and say it...
OWNED!
I think it's widely recognized in the civilized world that Fox news is not a reputable news source. We might as well refer to a fiction binladen news network if we are going to refer to Fox news.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter