• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

We are paying ransom now??



<< The officials point to the October 2000 kidnapping of four American oil workers in Ecuador as setting the precedent for the policy shift. The hostages were freed after their companies paid millions in ransom.

However, the United States and local authorities in Colombia and Ecuador worked together to track down the kidnappers and recover the ransom.

The bottom line, said one senior Bush official, is that paying the ransom "worked" --even though it was not U.S. policy at the time.
>>




Even thought they caught the kidnappers in this case... there is a possibility they could have gotten away. If we give kidnappers even the slightest idea they have a chance, however slim, to get away with something - won't that just give them more reason to try?
 
This might not be a mistake. Terrorists are less likely to kill a hostage if there is a real chance to collect a ransom. And they will have to show themselves in some way to try and collect it. But, I can see how this would also increase the motivation to kidnap someone in the first place.
 
Back
Top