then this guy on Fox is interviewing a former ambassador to North Korea, and asks him," Should the US back a Chinese invasion of North Korea?"
WTF????
Saw this approx. 4 1/2 hours ago.
WTF????
Saw this approx. 4 1/2 hours ago.
We are in deep kimchee.
- Thread starter OokiiNeko
- Start date
for exactly what? military strikes or an outright invasion? we can't handle Iraq with it's 24 million people, how on earth do they figure we can occupy Iran, a country 3.5x the size of Iraq and 70 million people?
All great empires eventually fall
military strikes / invasion = U.S getting attacked.
Either way the U.S will have to attack Iran with all they have and they will have to forget about Iraq.
Either way the U.S will have to attack Iran with all they have and they will have to forget about Iraq.
Fox News mission is to create and maintain support for various invasions should their handlers need it.
Engineer
Elite Member
- Oct 9, 1999
- 39,230
- 701
- 126
Originally posted by: Ozoned
How about we pass harsher sanctions against Iran and do nothing to enforce them for about 12 years and then invade and blame the problem on the president that is serving at the time.(fits your theme for the night, you know, the Clinton thing.)
12 years might be enough time for the average Joe US Taxpayer to forget about this last fvckup, especially if a timely tax cut can be thrown in. :Q
BeauJangles
Lifer
- Aug 26, 2001
- 13,941
- 1
- 0
Why doesn't the US just give the EU time to see if their deal with Iran works. So far, it seems like it is promising.
For the same reason Bush didn't wait before attacking Afghanistan and Iraq.
Because he thinks he's acting out God's plan. He's gone insane and has a bastion of PNAC neocons patting his back along the way.
The U.S doesn't have communication with Iran. None. Europe has open communication/trade with Iran and they do not wish to go to war with Iran.
If the U.S was to listen to the EU then the U.S can't go to war. Therefore the U.S ignores what the EU has to say and makes up their own decision on wether or not Iran is going to make nuclear bombs.
France, German, Great Britain, all three of them have investments in Iran and it is not in their best interest to go to war with Iran.
The big three always seem to be the ones to lose something in the event of a war.
Liberals are interesting. They complain that Iran and N. Korea are the real threat, but when someone thinks the republicans are going to do something they are shaking in their boots. Maybe we need to develop the super cruise missile with a megolithic payload capability and just bomb the reactors from a distance. You could bomb most of north korea from a ship.
Nobody wants to attack North Korea. All of the inhabitants think the USA Started the Korean War. They have all been brainwashed by their Communist Masters. They have no concept of reality. They bow down to their God, Kim Il Sung.
You cant really win attacking Iran. There may be some advantage to using some bunker busters on their nuclear sites. Syria is just as bad. Syria claims to be interested in peace but people keep coming accross the border to kill innocent civilians, soldiers, and to bomb the masques that they will not even let an American Protect.
You will not know the outcome of this war for another 20 years. Kind of makes you sick.
Nobody wants to attack North Korea. All of the inhabitants think the USA Started the Korean War. They have all been brainwashed by their Communist Masters. They have no concept of reality. They bow down to their God, Kim Il Sung.
You cant really win attacking Iran. There may be some advantage to using some bunker busters on their nuclear sites. Syria is just as bad. Syria claims to be interested in peace but people keep coming accross the border to kill innocent civilians, soldiers, and to bomb the masques that they will not even let an American Protect.
You will not know the outcome of this war for another 20 years. Kind of makes you sick.
Reading comprehension class for ntdz:
All the republicans means "all of US republicans." So you'd have to go to and your stat about the army being Republican doesn't help. Think Venn diagrams.
Yeah because the 1/10 soldiers and 1/40 reserves/guard we have there are really overextending us... Overextension is a media built myth. There are 250,000 soldiers is Europe that have done nothing since 1960 - time to give them something to do. There is almost an equal amount in Asia.
The US has more than enough troops to fight five or six Iraq's at the same time.
that's the stupidest thing I?ve read on this forum in a long time.
he'll do it because he's the willing servant of our military industrial complex, not because of some religious reasons.
... irony noted.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter