Except for GK110 not having an IHS and the obvious photoshop of the chip pictured there not actually being a part of the image of the blurry PCB...
Look, this is getting a bit OT and I honestly don't care for defending the honor of a site I didn't even know existed until just now but at the risk of appealing to an often-gif'd internet stereotype, I've worked with photoshop a lot in my days and this one look legit to me.
I can point out reasons why I believe the picture doesn't look fake (such as the light reflection on the chip putting it on the same plane as the card and the perspective matching through the slight lens distortion) but I can't explain why this chip has an IHS when the production ones don't.
Maybe it's an early engineering sample that happens to have one or maybe the whole card is fake and the picture was real, I don't know or care to find out. I just wanted to point out that some folks jumped to conclusions on the authenticity of the picture itself.
