Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: moshquerade
I have never been in any church where anyone said, "God needs money".
At the church I go to there is a collection at every mass. It is voluntary. It is not a "membership fee" that you have to pay to remain a member. The minister/priest/pastor rarely mentions the collection except when they are collecting for something extra like for right to life, missionary work, etc. I have never been pressured to give.
Those of you who actually don't know what goes on beyond the chapel doors because you don't attend a church are really just shooting from your hip. I don't give you crap because you don't attend, but the non-believers are quite loud and feel the need to be heard whenever the topic of religion comes up. I wonder why that is....
Why go to church? Why not just go right to the source? The bible itself says that God wants tithes, though usually not in currency as we're accustomed to, but it was always some relevant portion of each person's income.
And just historically, there have been far too many churches (>0 would be too many for those who are "doing God's work) where tithing was talked up as the way to get into God's good graces. If you can't trust those who say that they're God's good people, then what are you left with? God needs better QC standards.
Why the wish to be heard? Part of it was summed up in Godless' sig awhile ago, that there is no term for people who don't believe Elvis lives on Mars, or no term for people who don't believe in Santa (something along those lines), yet there are still an astonishing number of people still believe in these thousands of years-old dogmas of fanciful, silly children's stories, and it is somehow viewed as being "normal." There's a big man in the sky who has things he wants people to do, but no one can agree on what they are, and he doesn't seem to care one way or another. But people still supposedly know how they can please him, with no reinforcement or denial as evidence - the only "evidence" is purely circumstantial, like saying that an astrology forecast is correct. It's all just absurd, and rather unsettling.
And of course there's the discrimination that's present. An atheist running for public office in this country? He might as well announce that he enjoys having sex with decapitated kittens. But if his opponent announces in the a speech that he himself is a good Christian who has sex with decapitated kittens, he'd probably get more votes than the normal atheist.