Spending the time to develop software that half your userbase can't use is a bad idea imho.
Who does that?
Spending the time to develop software that half your userbase can't use is a bad idea imho.
Spending the time to develop software that half your userbase can't use is a bad idea imho.
NVIDIA is now >70% of the gaming dGPU userbase![]()
And more than 60-70% of them cannot run any new 2016 game at 1080p with GW features enabled at 60fps or more. So having all those Gamework features that only the select 10-15% of the NVIDIA user base can actually use and get acceptable framerate doesnt mean a flying fart for low/middle-end dGPU users even if NVIDIA had 100% of the dGPU market.
So, according to your post, GameWorks are the marketing tools only... yes, they are.
Yes, I would prefer not to add them at all or add a open-sourced and optimizable alternatives.
If you don't like GameWorks features, turn 'em off.
Yes, I would prefer not to add them at all or add a open-sourced and optimizable alternatives.
Its not the features that are the problem, the problem is all the optimizations that purposely affect AMD GPU performance in a negative way. Not to mention their "features" are nothing more than performance hogs that even with the latest 1080 you can't run without suffering massive drops in performance.If you don't like GameWorks features, turn 'em off.
