Wasn't T3 supposed to be PG-13?

Viper GTS

Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
38,107
433
136
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
I better be R or it will suck

My thoughts exactly, I was horrified when they said it was going to be PG-13.

Same thing with the final Matrix, it better be R as well.

Viper GTS
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
No way. It should be PG-13 or even PG if that could be attainable. This violence in movies makes kids hurt others. Remember Colombine? I'm boycotting R-rated movies.
 
May 31, 2001
15,326
2
0
Originally posted by: americangigolo
No way. It should be PG-13 or even PG if that could be attainable. This violence in movies makes kids hurt others. Remember Colombine? I'm boycotting R-rated movies.

You sir, are retarded. Get back on the short bus.
 

clamum

Lifer
Feb 13, 2003
26,256
406
126
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: americangigolo
No way. It should be PG-13 or even PG if that could be attainable. This violence in movies makes kids hurt others. Remember Colombine? I'm boycotting R-rated movies.

You sir, are retarded. Get back on the short bus.

LOL
Forgot the <sarcasm> </sarcasm> tags. Hehe...actually I just wanted to see how people would respond. See how ridiculous the claim of "violence in movies (music and video games too, for that matter) makes kids violent" sounds? :)
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
Nudity in movies is so stupid. I hate it when they throw it in just to get the perverts to watch the movie. If I wanted to watch that, I would rent some pr0no. I want to see some kick @$$ terminators kicking @$$. I want a quality movie. I don't care what it rated as long as the storyline is good and deep.
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Nudity in movies is so stupid. I hate it when they throw it in just to get the perverts to watch the movie.
Originally posted by: Toasthead
Man I hope its not PG13...that chick is HOT and I heard she is nekkid too
*snicker*
 

tk149

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2002
7,253
1
0
I thought T1 was "R" and T2 was "PG-13"?

IMO, T2 was better than T1. I think the PG-13 vs. R argument is silly. I just wanna see a good flick.
 

Glitchny

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2002
5,679
1
0
Originally posted by: tk149
I thought T1 was "R" and T2 was "PG-13"?

IMO, T2 was better than T1. I think the PG-13 vs. R argument is silly. I just wanna see a good flick.

i thought T2 was better as well.. but both are good and i dont think its was pg-13.. i mean arnold cutting the skin off his arm probally wouldnt fly for a pg-13 film
 

FrogDog

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2000
4,761
0
0
Originally posted by: tk149
I thought T1 was "R" and T2 was "PG-13"?

IMO, T2 was better than T1. I think the PG-13 vs. R argument is silly. I just wanna see a good flick.
It was rated R, according to my DVD.

 

TallBill

Lifer
Apr 29, 2001
46,017
62
91
an R rated movie is so much better then a pg-13 on average. and there is never anything wrong with some nudity :p Just think how much wild things would have sucked without it