Was the 2012 election stolen?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,732
2
81

Ausm

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
25,213
14
81
Screwups - always

Stolen no - not in the terms the Dems use.

Obama won it - a few hundred/thousand votes are not going to have an impact anywhere.

Especially when Obama had 3 million+ more votes in the popular vote.
 

sm625

Diamond Member
May 6, 2011
8,172
137
106
The vote was stolen by wall street, and the people got bent over and raped. Like any prison rape victim, they are actually proud to be raped, as long as they get to see their rapist take it out on someone else, so they can feel better than that next victim. People in this country are so mentally damaged.... They cannot understand that these candidates stand for giving trillions a year to the rich. Literally. In. Your. Face. Stealing and mass looting just to enrich the 1%. And the dumbed down mindfunked masses dont even have the cognitive ability to understand how simple and obvious it is.

They know to surrender all their data to facebook and the government. They know to take their mercury and drink their fluoride. They know to watch their family die to a big pharma coctail. They know to put that frickin radiation device up to their head every day. They know they're supposed to work their whole lives to send their kids to a ripoff college that will only teach them how to be raped finacially. And while all this is happening, they will be so damned proud that their guy, their shill, their prison rapist, their obama, won a meaningless election, and the other guy, who stands for the exact same frickin thing, lost. And that makes it all alright.
 

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,732
2
81
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/11/evidence-adds-up-election-was-stolen-2495088.html

Mark Alexander, publisher of The Patriot Post writes, “I wanted to send you the most current county-by-county election map, which clearly reveals what state election maps don’t, and what Obama and his leftist cadres do NOT want you to contemplate. It shows where leftist constituencies reside. (By the way, we have taken the Liberty to correct the colors – RED is a much more fitting color for the leftist strongholds.)”

121112countymap.jpg


If this map is true there is no way in hell Obama could have got elected should have been a major landslide in the other direction.
 

Charles Kozierok

Elite Member
May 14, 2012
6,762
1
0
If this map is true there is no way in hell Obama could have got elected should have been a major landslide in the other direction.

If you actually believe that map proves that Romney should have won in a landslide, you don't even understand the basics of politics.

Hint: People vote. Not cows.
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/11/evidence-adds-up-election-was-stolen-2495088.html



121112countymap.jpg


If this map is true there is no way in hell Obama could have got elected should have been a major landslide in the other direction.

Two 5th grade level pieces of education for you.

1. It's not "have got."
2. One of those little red dots (NYC) has more people than FORTY TWO of the states have. That little red dot represents as many people as the entire populations of New Mexico, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Alaska, and Wyoming COMBINED.

It's beyond retarded that you can't comprehend this. Then again, you were quick to believe that 140% of the population in multiple counties had voted, and that no RESPECTABLE source freaked out about it.
 

boomerang

Lifer
Jun 19, 2000
18,883
641
126
I can see that providing a number of the links in the original article as a favor to everyone has ended up just being information overload. The quote below from one of the links states what occurred and does also give some background information that at first glance could explain what happened, but goes on further to plant a big seed of doubt. Personally, I think that 59 voting divisions having zero votes for Romney is statistically impossible. What do you Obama supporters think?

Still, was there not one contrarian voter in those 59 divisions, where unofficial vote tallies have President Obama outscoring Romney by a combined 19,605 to 0?

The unanimous support for Obama in these Philadelphia neighborhoods - clustered in almost exclusively black sections of West and North Philadelphia - fertilizes fears of fraud, despite little hard evidence.

Upon hearing the numbers, Steve Miskin, a spokesman for Republicans in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, brought up his party's voter-identification initiative - which was held off for this election - and said, "We believe we need to continue ensuring the integrity of the ballot."
The absence of a voter-ID law, however, would not stop anyone from voting for a Republican candidate.

Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia who has studied African American precincts, said he had occasionally seen 100 percent of the vote go for the Democratic candidate. Chicago and Atlanta each had precincts that registered no votes for Republican Sen. John McCain in 2008.

"I'd be surprised if there weren't a handful of precincts that didn't cast a vote for Romney," he said. But the number of zero precincts in Philadelphia deserves examination, Sabato added.

"Not a single vote for Romney or even an error? That's worth looking into," he said.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,931
6,793
126
the problem with voter fraud is that there is scant evidence unless one is caught.

With a murder; most times there is the evidence even though the perp is not caught.

I know, I haven't caught the Kenyan under my bed yet but I just know he's there. I can feel it when he moves the hairs on the back of my neck.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,931
6,793
126
My theory is it was the aliens in orbit manipulating everything from the beginning. They're the ones behind 9/11 because they wanted to establish the TSA and Homeland Security so they could continue their anal probe x-per-e-ments. Obamacare is their way of going national with their anal probes and, so, they had to make sure he won the election.

By the way, can you guess which politicians have been subjected to the alien anal probe mind control devices?

That can't be. The Republicans have lost their heads and would support anal probes in an effort to find them, among other reasons.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
As long as the government is able to provide what some consider to be handouts to the population centers; those people will vote for their handouts.

People that are outside of the population centers can complain all they want, but they are outnumbered.

As the Doc states, NYC area can negate the rest of the state if needed in terms of statewide impacts.

The same goes for PA. Philly, Pitt and the union area overwhelm the rest of the state.

When 6-% of the population is concentrated into the urban areas; the rural areas get the short stick nationally.
However, they also then have the better chance for control locally.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
I know, I haven't caught the Kenyan under my bed yet but I just know he's there. I can feel it when he moves the hairs on the back of my neck.

Impressive presence happening there. going through the bed and your body.

Be glad the he is going after the hair on the back of your neck.

A better impact is if he aimed lower down to get your attention :p :whiste: :oops:
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,931
6,793
126
I can see that providing a number of the links in the original article as a favor to everyone has ended up just being information overload. The quote below from one of the links states what occurred and does also give some background information that at first glance could explain what happened, but goes on further to plant a big seed of doubt. Personally, I think that 59 voting divisions having zero votes for Romney is statistically impossible. What do you Obama supporters think?

That big seed of doubt is an extra growth in your head involving the right amygdala and the emotion of fear. You have a brain that is looking to experience a paranoid state for the sake of a chemical pleasure you get from a persecution complex. You can watch your friends in Iran do the same thing every year when they run down the streets beating themselves with whips. For the perverted there is only perverted pleasure.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,931
6,793
126
Impressive presence happening there. going through the bed and your body.

Be glad the he is going after the hair on the back of your neck.

A better impact is if he aimed lower down to get your attention :p :whiste: :oops:

Thanks but I prefer my fictional psychosis to your real one.
 

randomrogue

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2011
5,449
0
0
I can see that providing a number of the links in the original article as a favor to everyone has ended up just being information overload. The quote below from one of the links states what occurred and does also give some background information that at first glance could explain what happened, but goes on further to plant a big seed of doubt. Personally, I think that 59 voting divisions having zero votes for Romney is statistically impossible. What do you Obama supporters think?

19,000 people didn't vote for Romney? Yes that's easily possible. I don't quite think you understand how insignificant that is.

Romney lost big. It's not a surprise to most people.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,931
6,793
126
The important data to take from this thread is the fact that the conservative brain can't deal because of it's fixation on moral factors that strengthen group cohesion including the gut feeling of disgust for others. The conservative doesn't just know the truth he feels superior because he knows it. Any attack of his opinions is an attack on his self respect, phony though it may be.

In other words, conservatives are blind like bigots and can't see their bigotry because if they did they would feel pain, the loss of the only self respect that they have. A phony self respect for them is better than none. This is a survival technique that allows children to defend their minds from assault as children by bonding with the source of their torture mentally. Nazis beget Nazis bigots.

When the veneer of their delusions collide with reality, when their team suffers defeat, it stirs up irrational fear, the fear that they really are as worthless as they were made to feel. But because of the damage to their brains that pre-exists, they can't muster the kind of logic that separated fear from fact which of course means they can't think rationally and logically. Everything will go into strengthening the bubble of personal superiority they need to live in. They can suffer utter defeat and still call it a win.

You can argue forever but they will remain blind, in fact the more you argue the surer they will be that they are right. Heck, what other reason could there be that people argue with them than the fact that they are right. They know the truth in their guts and there's not a single brain cell there. Just a lot of peristaltic muscle and autonomic process.