I think that he was pretty far left/authoritarian. For example, he favored the drug war like his two opponents, he favored public education, abortion, gun control, and the EPA like Clinton, and he had a pro-Palestinian foreign policy. So except for his support for the drug war, he was basically the Dennis Kucinich wing of the Democratic Party.
In other words, Clinton was really the moderate and probably the most independent, except for his super hawkish foreign policy. Bush 41 was in the middle on foreign policy while Clinton was the moderate on everything else.
I also think the reason he got treated well by the MSM was because he really wasn't an independent... in other words, the MSM had nothing to worry about since he wasn't going to reduce centralization of power. If Dr. Paul, on the other hand, had become president, then CNN/ABC/MSNBC/CBS/Fox would've gone out of business because Dr. Paul would've allowed the info to come out that McVeigh was an FBI agent... in other words, no one would watch the MSM because they could no longer be trusted by viewers if Dr. Paul became President.
In other words, Clinton was really the moderate and probably the most independent, except for his super hawkish foreign policy. Bush 41 was in the middle on foreign policy while Clinton was the moderate on everything else.
I also think the reason he got treated well by the MSM was because he really wasn't an independent... in other words, the MSM had nothing to worry about since he wasn't going to reduce centralization of power. If Dr. Paul, on the other hand, had become president, then CNN/ABC/MSNBC/CBS/Fox would've gone out of business because Dr. Paul would've allowed the info to come out that McVeigh was an FBI agent... in other words, no one would watch the MSM because they could no longer be trusted by viewers if Dr. Paul became President.