Originally posted by: SampSon
So basically what you're saying is that you don't know.Originally posted by: Taggart
Originally posted by: SampSon
Prove it, hotshot.Originally posted by: Taggart
Originally posted by: SampSon
no.
Are you serious? You really need to have your head examined if you think he isn't a murderer.
the evidence speaks for itself
Originally posted by: Amplifier
I know nothing about the case besides OJ was found innocent and most people thought he was guilty. Why are people so sure that he killed his wife?
Just as a curiousity, I put up a poll so we can see were ATOT stands.
Originally posted by: joedrake
I agree with the court's decision
Originally posted by: jjones
Is the Pope Catholic?
Originally posted by: boomerang
You know...it's funny. I remember watching that trial a lot (especially during the summer when school was out) when I was about 14 or 15. Back then, I thought he was guilty as hell...and i still do now....but after I read that webpage, and look back at the trial, I can't for the life of me imagine how a jury cannot convict someone given that evidence. It was a truly sad day for the legal system.
Originally posted by: Nebor
He killed the ****** out of them.
Now that both the criminal and civil cases are over he should write a book:
I did it, I liked it and I'd do it again
By OJ Simpson.
As if there aren't enough politicians on both sides to provide this "inspiration".Originally posted by: DayLaPaul
OJ was an inspiration. His case gave hope to every young kid in America that someday, if you get rich enough and famous enough, anyone can get away with double murder.
Originally posted by: Superself
I think he did it.
But for the life of me I don't know how he could stab one person....and STILL get to the other one (while they were watching) so fast and knife them down too!! That must have been one hell of a killing!
Originally posted by: Kanalua
OJ is not guilty of killing his wife or her boyfriend.
Originally posted by: astrocase
The cops were guilty of trying to frame him. Guilty or not, we can't have that and he should have gone free. Any doubt whatsoever should lead to a not-guilty verdict and the cops made sure there was a lot of doubt.
Originally posted by: Chadder007
Originally posted by: clamum
If the glove does not fit, you must acquit!
Even if you put on another pair of gloves in the first place, and the ones you are putting on used to be skin tight and sat out a while in the moist air causing them to shrink a tad also??? 😕
Originally posted by: GuitarDaddy
Originally posted by: BrianH1
It became a racial case in some sorts. I cant remember the guys name but he was asked if he had ever said the word "******", to which he replied no. Then they played a tape, and sure enough he said it.
Detective Mark Furman