• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Was Michael Jackson guilty?

6

6000SUX

Golden Member
but OJ Simpson and Michael Jackson are two of the biggest cases recently where someone got off that most people think is guilty.

I'm not asking if he should have walked or not... just, do you think he's a child molester?

This is a follow-on to this thread about OJ Simpson. These cases really point out the importance of having credible witnesses.

If you vote "no", please post why you feel that way. Thank you.
 
yes
come on he is a freak, he is liek a lil kid, never had a real relationship, as abused by his dad as a child, he was in a fake marriage that ended, and he had paid off how many kids now to drop rape cases against him!? an innocent man would spend every penny he has to prove his innocense, not pay off the parents to go away
 
I don?t think he is guilty but I feel he is mentally still a child (He had no child hood) and for that reason he should not be around kids.
 
Hes a freak. It wasnt a race thing that got him, or OJ for that matter) off, it was a fame/money thing. If he was some guy that no one ever heard of, he would be rotting in prison.
 
I think he could be. I'm leaning on the no side though.

He's obviously a really messed up guy. I wouldn't want him around me let alone kids since child molester or not he's just weird and a bad influence. Being weird though is not a crime. It just makes it easier for us to believe that he could be a child molester.

If he really was a child molester I think people with credibility would have spoken up. They would have put a stop to it. The family that accused him was obviously out to make money.

There were far too many people that could have put him away and not one did.
 
haha, I read this as "was Michael Jackson quilty" I had no idea what the OP was talking about.

but yes he was guilty
 
sure he is a child mollester. But i do beleive the last case was one for money. while he may have played with the little boy the mother seemed to not care and wanted a payday.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top