Was Iraq connected to the September 11th, 2001 attacks?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: DoubleL
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?

Yes you are wrong, Kerry had the same info that Bush did

I think Iraq had something to do with 9/11 one way or the other,

What? Did I miss the memo? What WMD are you referring to?

 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: classy
Everybody in America believed Bush's "intelligence" and supported the act of war. But now its clear it was a lie. Plain and simple. The man lied.

His entire administration deceived the nation (Cheney, Powell, and Rice included)


Why would the administration put their selves into the position they are in (your view)
if they didn't truly accept that Iraq was a risk.
It would be rather "stuped" to make yourself look so stuped.

Bush administration action removed the possibility to prove
that Iraq (under Sadam) was a risk.


To the posters question, the jury is not in yet.




 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Because Bush thought he would get away with it. He thought if he just found one cache of banned weapons he'd be exonerated.

He bet wrong.

Besides, look at where we are with the multitude of Bush apologists.
 

Gaard

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
8,911
1
0
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: DoubleL
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?

Yes you are wrong, Kerry had the same info that Bush did

I think Iraq had something to do with 9/11 one way or the other,

What? Did I miss the memo? What WMD are you referring to?

Does anyone know what DoubleL is talking about?
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,407
8,595
126
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: DoubleL
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?

Yes you are wrong, Kerry had the same info that Bush did

I think Iraq had something to do with 9/11 one way or the other,

What? Did I miss the memo? What WMD are you referring to?

Does anyone know what DoubleL is talking about?

well, if you read the text, it says that the bush admin provided intelligence indicating that hussein had wmds. i'm really not certain how that could be read any other way.
 

Bulk Beef

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
5,466
0
76
DoubleL was actually quoting Orsorum.

And I'm still hoping someone can tell me when the last time the admin pushed the idea of Iraqi involvement in 9-11 was?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: DoubleL
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?
Yes you are wrong, Kerry had the same info that Bush did
No he did NOT, a fact that has been explained repeatedly here, in multiple threads. That you continue to repeat this disinformation says much about your honesty and objectivity.


I think Iraq had something to do with 9/11 one way or the other,
I used to think Santa Claus came down the chimney. Your opinion is not supported by fact.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: sward666
DoubleL was actually quoting Orsorum.

And I'm still hoping someone can tell me when the last time the admin pushed the idea of Iraqi involvement in 9-11 was?
Are you asking when did they stop suggesting this connection, or are you implying they never suggested a connection between 9/11 and Iraq?
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Originally posted by: sward666
I'm implying nothing. The question should be crystal clear.
Well it isn't, so you can continue playing games or you can spend 30 seconds to clarify your question. The time you wasted with your post above could have just as easily been spent rephrasing the question to make it "crystal clear". As it is, your question is ambiguous.
 

Bulk Beef

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
5,466
0
76
Who's playing games? I asked a question in plain English - if you're reading some implication into it, that's your problem, not mine, but to satisfy YOU, I will re-rephrase the question using the exact wording I did yesterday.
When was the last time anyone in this admin implied that it was, or that it was possible?
I'm not sure what isn't clear about the question.