Was Iraq connected to the September 11th, 2001 attacks?
- Thread starter Orsorum
- Start date
There is no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11. But if you ask Bush he'll tell you "his" intelligence told him they were. When he started this war he declared it was against terrorism and all the WMDs. After we found nothing, it became a mission to free the Iraq people?
Originally posted by: classy
There is no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11. But if you ask Bush he'll tell you "his" intelligence told him they were. When he started this war he declared it was against terrorism and all the WMDs. After we found nothing, it became a mission to free the Iraq people?
Guess we should expose Kerry for the liar he is too then because he made a strong case against Iraq and their WMDs.
Originally posted by: LordJezo
Originally posted by: classy
There is no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11. But if you ask Bush he'll tell you "his" intelligence told him they were. When he started this war he declared it was against terrorism and all the WMDs. After we found nothing, it became a mission to free the Iraq people?
Guess we should expose Kerry for the liar he is too then because he made a strong case against Iraq and their WMDs.
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: LordJezo
Originally posted by: classy
There is no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11. But if you ask Bush he'll tell you "his" intelligence told him they were. When he started this war he declared it was against terrorism and all the WMDs. After we found nothing, it became a mission to free the Iraq people?
Guess we should expose Kerry for the liar he is too then because he made a strong case against Iraq and their WMDs.
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?
Everyone had the same information. Bush, Kerry, England, CLINTON..
Originally posted by: LordJezo
Originally posted by: Orsorum
Originally posted by: LordJezo
Originally posted by: classy
There is no evidence that Iraq was involved in 9/11. But if you ask Bush he'll tell you "his" intelligence told him they were. When he started this war he declared it was against terrorism and all the WMDs. After we found nothing, it became a mission to free the Iraq people?
Guess we should expose Kerry for the liar he is too then because he made a strong case against Iraq and their WMDs.
It was my understanding that he made his decision based on the intelligence that Hussein had WMDs, intelligence provided by the Bush administration. Am I wrong?
Everyone had the same information. Bush, Kerry, England, CLINTON..
You do knew that Clinton information would old. Are you saying that bush gather no new intelligence on iraq the whole time he was president.
Yeah.. more false information from the same people by the same people.
Where was the huge outcry when Clinton bombed Iraq?
The premise hasn't changed. It was a multi-part premise. Some parts have proved very true, some have not.
Everybody in America believed Bush's "intelligence" and supported the act of war. But now its clear it was a lie. Plain and simple. The man lied.
Oh.
So because Clinton did a half arsed job and didn't finish what needed to be done it was okay then.
Makes sense.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter