• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Was Clinton a murderer?

Reinstated at Infohawk's request.

For the record, I think the "Clinton murders" smears are just as distasteful and disrepectful as the "bush knew" smears.



Link
 
If they were they sure were a lot more discreet than the current administrion. Oh wait, that isn't murder, that's called collateral damage.
 
This looks to become yet another thread where the Clinton apologists use every trick in the book except actually addressing the points raised
 
Let me know when the Clinton total approaches 15,000 (Coalition Troops + Iraqi Civilians).
 
If you have nothing to contribute, don't. Move on to the next thread. All you bleating Clinties do is attack and divert. The last thing you'll do is actually support your position with facts, figures, and thoughtful commentary. After watching this behavior for months, one starts to assume it's because you cannot support your side.
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
If you have nothing to contribute, don't. Move on to the next thread. All you bleating Clinties do is attack and divert. The last thing you'll do is actually support your position with facts, figures, and thoughtful commentary. After watching this behavior for months, one starts to assume it's because you cannot support your side.

Sounds like you need some more Hillbilly Heroin... Can't find anymore prescriptions?
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: alchemize
If you have nothing to contribute, don't. Move on to the next thread. All you bleating Clinties do is attack and divert. The last thing you'll do is actually support your position with facts, figures, and thoughtful commentary. After watching this behavior for months, one starts to assume it's because you cannot support your side.

Sounds like you need some more Hillbilly Heroin... Can't find anymore prescriptions?

Would you want Clinton behind Bars if he had a hand in it?

 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: alchemize
If you have nothing to contribute, don't. Move on to the next thread. All you bleating Clinties do is attack and divert. The last thing you'll do is actually support your position with facts, figures, and thoughtful commentary. After watching this behavior for months, one starts to assume it's because you cannot support your side.

Sounds like you need some more Hillbilly Heroin... Can't find anymore prescriptions?

Would you want Clinton behind Bars if he had a hand in it?

Sure I would.. What kind of stupid question is that? That makes it sound like you wouldn't want your Messiah behind bars if he stole the election...
 
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
This is seriously a pathetic thread.

If you think the article is wrong, misguided, whatever, back it up with facts and figures and evidence supporting you point of view. As a group, you and the other bleating Clinties spend your entire existence attacking the right instead of supporting the left. For God's sake, put up or shut up. Use those stones you're throwing to build your case, for sheer novelty value if nothing else.


 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: b0mbrman
Ha ha

I love this thread 🙂

Too bad people here have their blinders on or they might be suitably amused 🙂
😉
There you go. Now all you need to do is find a Snopes entry or similar source that refutes the Fourth Reich article and you will have contributed something to the thread. That's the point you seem to keep missing.
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Let me know when the Clinton total approaches 15,000 (Coalition Troops + Iraqi Civilians).
Any apologists want to ring in and answer the question?

IT was addressed to you Mr. Dittohead
Does your own soup taste icky, Dahunan?



So, you do not believe in fair and honest investigations?
 
now, i dont know how to address the facts...becuase its a list of dead people...
but im guessing clinton knows a lot more people than i do.
coincidence?
there are a lot of people with bad info on clinton still walking around, right?
 
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Let me know when the Clinton total approaches 15,000 (Coalition Troops + Iraqi Civilians).
Any apologists want to ring in and answer the question?

IT was addressed to you Mr. Dittohead
Does your own soup taste icky, Dahunan?



So, you do not believe in fair and honest investigations?



I fully believe in the threads I post.. UNLIKE YOU who are only trolling and hoping to make a difference??
 
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: dahunan
Originally posted by: alchemize
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Let me know when the Clinton total approaches 15,000 (Coalition Troops + Iraqi Civilians).
Any apologists want to ring in and answer the question?

IT was addressed to you Mr. Dittohead
Does your own soup taste icky, Dahunan?



So, you do not believe in fair and honest investigations?



I fully believe in the threads I post.. UNLIKE YOU who are only trolling and hoping to make a difference??

And that's what is frightening. You DO believe that crap. Oh well, gotta have something to do in your basement until mom calls you up.
 
Back
Top