Shawn Lifer Apr 20, 2003 32,236 53 91 Sep 21, 2006 #2 Cool. But I'd rather just have bluray fail. I hate having 2 formats.
M mordantmonkey Diamond Member Dec 23, 2004 3,075 5 0 Sep 21, 2006 #3 does this mean that you could have a double capacity? or does blu-ray and HD-DVD normally have two layers?
does this mean that you could have a double capacity? or does blu-ray and HD-DVD normally have two layers?
C coinz Senior member Oct 1, 2004 482 0 0 Sep 21, 2006 #4 Originally posted by: mordantmonkey does this mean that you could have a double capacity? or does blu-ray and HD-DVD normally have two layers? Click to expand... Not sure on that one I think they just made it seperate
Originally posted by: mordantmonkey does this mean that you could have a double capacity? or does blu-ray and HD-DVD normally have two layers? Click to expand... Not sure on that one I think they just made it seperate
mugs Lifer Apr 29, 2003 48,920 46 91 Sep 21, 2006 #5 Sweet, so they can pay double licensing fees on each disc they produce. Of course Warner will license this to all of the other studios and they'll be paying triple fees!
Sweet, so they can pay double licensing fees on each disc they produce. Of course Warner will license this to all of the other studios and they'll be paying triple fees!
0roo0roo No Lifer Sep 21, 2002 64,795 84 91 Sep 21, 2006 #7 yup silly. the double layer hddvd+dvd they announced earlier seems like a better deal.