War?

[Polish3d]

Originally posted by: PELarson

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani
And to think... Hezbollah is blamed for targetting civilian/civilian targets

Whenever the arab/Islamic world is tired of these types of deaths, they can renounce their anti-semitic racism and desire to see the Jewish people of Israel slaughtered and driven out, and these deaths will stop.

Knowledge goes a long way. Both groups of combatants in this conflict are Semitic.

"In historic times all Western Asia (see below), with the exception of the peninsula of Asia Minor, was Semitic. From the philological point of view the Semitic peoples are divided into four chief Babylonian-Assyrian Semites (East Semites), Chanaanitic Semites, (West Semites), Aramaic Semites (North Semites), and Arabian Semites (South Semites). The last-named group is divided into North and South Arabians, of which last the Abyssinians are a branch. The first three groups are usually termed North Semites, in contrast to the Arabian group, or South Semites. But the classification of the Babylonian with the Aramaic and Chanaanitic Semites is not permissible from the philological point of view. "

That was pointless

 

[Googer]

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

 

[Kadarin]

I'm guessing the OP actually believes the Hezbollah bunker that was bombed by Israel the other day really was "a mosque under construction"...

 

[Czar]

I'm breaking my silence here.

How can so many of you have absolutely no humanity in you. Deaths do not matter, the dead are dead. Those who matter are those who survive, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their homes, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their childern, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their way of life. When people are trying to say that if israel want to kill civilians they would be killing alot more of them, yes that is true but that is not the point. The point is that israel is deliberatly causing devistation on the civilian population of lebanon. What we can clearly say is pure terrorism since they dont have any attainable millitary goals to reach.

Look up the definition of terrorism. Its not those you kill its those you make suffer :|

 

[Braznor]

If Israel deliberately wanted to target civilians, there would be no one left alive in the Middle East.

No other nation (except India which is still being ruled by a dhimmi govt) has to put up with the type of nonsense Israel does.

I commend Israel for showing restraint against the intolerant people of the Middle East.
If it was the U.S or Europe or Russia or China in Israel's place, they would have carpet bombed the region. But tiny Israel has to put up with civilians who actively support, shelter the terrorists, thanks to the hypocrites around the world.

Go Israel Go.

 

[Pacemaker]

Originally posted by: Googer

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

So if a terrorist from New York attacked Canada, then Canada would be justified in destroying America?s entire Infrastructure? After all we "allowed" them to operate on our soil.

However, comparing it to London 1941 is a little low. In 1941 it was pretty clear who started things. Now, in 2006 who started this? Hard to say, Israel has been holding people without trials (think gitmo) from Lebanon (and other Arab countries) for years, but it being done to 2 of their citizens is more then they can take. Personally I think both sides are wrong.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: Czar
I'm breaking my silence here.

How can so many of you have absolutely no humanity in you. Deaths do not matter, the dead are dead. Those who matter are those who survive, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their homes, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their childern, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their way of life. When people are trying to say that if israel want to kill civilians they would be killing alot more of them, yes that is true but that is not the point. The point is that israel is deliberatly causing devistation on the civilian population of lebanon. What we can clearly say is pure terrorism since they dont have any attainable millitary goals to reach.

Look up the definition of terrorism. Its not those you kill its those you make suffer :|

Yes, and Israelies have been suffering for decades wondering if a stray missile launched from Lebannon or Palestine is going to kill them when they are walking down the street. They also wonder if them or the child will be blown up randomly as they are buying there bread at the market, or going to school to learn by someone with bombs strapped to his chest whose religion told him too. Israel is giving there citizens peace of mind as they should. You are right, terrorism is who you make suffer, and Israelies have been suffering from this for over 40 years now. It is about time Israel did something about it.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: Pacemaker

Originally posted by: Googer

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

So if a terrorist from New York attacked Canada, then Canada would be justified in destroying America?s entire Infrastructure? After all we "allowed" them to operate on our soil.

However, comparing it to London 1941 is a little low. In 1941 it was pretty clear who started things. Now, in 2006 who started this? Hard to say, Israel has been holding people without trials (think gitmo) from Lebanon (and other Arab countries) for years, but it being done to 2 of their citizens is more then they can take. Personally I think both sides are wrong.

If the democrats attacked China, and the republicans sat back and did nothing, would China be justified in retaliating? That is a better scenario since Hez is part of the Lebannon government.

 

[The Green Bean]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Islamistani
And to think... Hezbollah is blamed for targetting civilian/civilian targets

Want some videos of the aftermath of some suicide bombers and missiel attacks? I offered BBOND last night after he posted some crap like this took, at least that way you can see both sides of the issue. 🙂

Sorry, that came off as coldhearted.

Your post is ignorant though, they are to blame because they have a policy that states they want to kill civlians. It is not Israely policy to kill civilians whereas with Hez and Hamas it is.

Wrong. They even apologized for 2 children killed. you are falling prey to Israeli propaganda.

 

[Czar]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Czar
I'm breaking my silence here.

How can so many of you have absolutely no humanity in you. Deaths do not matter, the dead are dead. Those who matter are those who survive, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their homes, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their childern, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their way of life. When people are trying to say that if israel want to kill civilians they would be killing alot more of them, yes that is true but that is not the point. The point is that israel is deliberatly causing devistation on the civilian population of lebanon. What we can clearly say is pure terrorism since they dont have any attainable millitary goals to reach.

Look up the definition of terrorism. Its not those you kill its those you make suffer :|

Yes, and Israelies have been suffering for decades wondering if a stray missile launched from Lebannon or Palestine is going to kill them when they are walking down the street. They also wonder if them or the child will be blown up randomly as they are buying there bread at the market, or going to school to learn by someone with bombs strapped to his chest whose religion told him too. Israel is giving there citizens peace of mind as they should. You are right, terrorism is who you make suffer, and Israelies have been suffering from this for over 40 years now. It is about time Israel did something about it.

So do you think its right to respond to terrorism with terrorism?

Do you think that in the minds of those not isreali who live in the are that their "attacks" are anything but responses to their fear of terrorism from isreal?

 

[Czar]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Pacemaker

Originally posted by: Googer

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

So if a terrorist from New York attacked Canada, then Canada would be justified in destroying America?s entire Infrastructure? After all we "allowed" them to operate on our soil.

However, comparing it to London 1941 is a little low. In 1941 it was pretty clear who started things. Now, in 2006 who started this? Hard to say, Israel has been holding people without trials (think gitmo) from Lebanon (and other Arab countries) for years, but it being done to 2 of their citizens is more then they can take. Personally I think both sides are wrong.

If the democrats attacked China, and the republicans sat back and did nothing, would China be justified in retaliating? That is a better scenario since Hez is part of the Lebannon government.

small part of the government, a move which was done to disarm hezbollah in time, giving them a voice and another chance to be heard without using violence

Why is that always skipped over?

 

[Pacemaker]

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Pacemaker

Originally posted by: Googer

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

So if a terrorist from New York attacked Canada, then Canada would be justified in destroying America?s entire Infrastructure? After all we "allowed" them to operate on our soil.

However, comparing it to London 1941 is a little low. In 1941 it was pretty clear who started things. Now, in 2006 who started this? Hard to say, Israel has been holding people without trials (think gitmo) from Lebanon (and other Arab countries) for years, but it being done to 2 of their citizens is more then they can take. Personally I think both sides are wrong.

If the democrats attacked China, and the republicans sat back and did nothing, would China be justified in retaliating? That is a better scenario since Hez is part of the Lebannon government.

The Lebanese government is a democracy, and from what I have read they were never even talked to by Israel. Maybe if they had gone to the government a solution that didn't involve killing hundreds of innocent people could have been reached. By the way % of dems in the US is WAY greater then the number of Hez in Lebanon. It would be like if the Green party attacked China more then if the Dems did.

 

[The Green Bean]

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani
And to think... Hezbollah is blamed for targetting civilian/civilian targets

Whenever the arab/Islamic world is tired of these types of deaths, they can renounce their anti-semitic racism and desire to see the Jewish people of Israel slaughtered and driven out, and these deaths will stop.

Here is a true terrorist apologist, attributing the murder of 400 INNOCENT CIVILIANS to anti-semitism and hatred for Jews.

That's the root of the issue. If the arab world left Israel alone, this stuff wouldn not occur. The arab world is fortunate that Israel is more civilized than they are.

It is Israel killing dozens on Palestenian civilians on a daily basis and nobody seems to care. The root casue is Israel's occupation of Palestine and now Lebanon, and its arrogance.

 

[Pacemaker]

Originally posted by: The Green Bean

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani
And to think... Hezbollah is blamed for targetting civilian/civilian targets

Whenever the arab/Islamic world is tired of these types of deaths, they can renounce their anti-semitic racism and desire to see the Jewish people of Israel slaughtered and driven out, and these deaths will stop.

Here is a true terrorist apologist, attributing the murder of 400 INNOCENT CIVILIANS to anti-semitism and hatred for Jews.

That's the root of the issue. If the arab world left Israel alone, this stuff wouldn not occur. The arab world is fortunate that Israel is more civilized than they are.

It is Israel killing dozens on Palestenian civilians on a daily basis and nobody seems to care. The root casue is Israel's occupation of Palestine and now Lebanon, and its arrogance.

I really have an issue with America's 100% unwavering support if Israel. From what I have seen it is basically only America that is supporting Israel in this. Even Britain said Israel went too far.

 

[Czar]

Originally posted by: The Green Bean

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani

Originally posted by: Frackal

Originally posted by: Islamistani
And to think... Hezbollah is blamed for targetting civilian/civilian targets

Whenever the arab/Islamic world is tired of these types of deaths, they can renounce their anti-semitic racism and desire to see the Jewish people of Israel slaughtered and driven out, and these deaths will stop.

Here is a true terrorist apologist, attributing the murder of 400 INNOCENT CIVILIANS to anti-semitism and hatred for Jews.

That's the root of the issue. If the arab world left Israel alone, this stuff wouldn not occur. The arab world is fortunate that Israel is more civilized than they are.

It is Israel killing dozens on Palestenian civilians on a daily basis and nobody seems to care. The root casue is Israel's occupation of Palestine and now Lebanon, and its arrogance.

And the occupation of syria's land

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: Czar

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Czar
I'm breaking my silence here.

How can so many of you have absolutely no humanity in you. Deaths do not matter, the dead are dead. Those who matter are those who survive, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their homes, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their childern, they are the ones who suffer from loosing their way of life. When people are trying to say that if israel want to kill civilians they would be killing alot more of them, yes that is true but that is not the point. The point is that israel is deliberatly causing devistation on the civilian population of lebanon. What we can clearly say is pure terrorism since they dont have any attainable millitary goals to reach.

Look up the definition of terrorism. Its not those you kill its those you make suffer :|

Yes, and Israelies have been suffering for decades wondering if a stray missile launched from Lebannon or Palestine is going to kill them when they are walking down the street. They also wonder if them or the child will be blown up randomly as they are buying there bread at the market, or going to school to learn by someone with bombs strapped to his chest whose religion told him too. Israel is giving there citizens peace of mind as they should. You are right, terrorism is who you make suffer, and Israelies have been suffering from this for over 40 years now. It is about time Israel did something about it.

So do you think its right to respond to terrorism with terrorism?

Do you think that in the minds of those not isreali who live in the are that their "attacks" are anything but responses to their fear of terrorism from isreal?

I think it is right to protect your citizens and your state, they are more important.

I do love how you shed tears for terrorists and the people who support them, but do not care about Israel civillian deaths. Says alot about you.

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: Pacemaker

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Pacemaker

Originally posted by: Googer

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

So if a terrorist from New York attacked Canada, then Canada would be justified in destroying America?s entire Infrastructure? After all we "allowed" them to operate on our soil.

However, comparing it to London 1941 is a little low. In 1941 it was pretty clear who started things. Now, in 2006 who started this? Hard to say, Israel has been holding people without trials (think gitmo) from Lebanon (and other Arab countries) for years, but it being done to 2 of their citizens is more then they can take. Personally I think both sides are wrong.

If the democrats attacked China, and the republicans sat back and did nothing, would China be justified in retaliating? That is a better scenario since Hez is part of the Lebannon government.

The Lebanese government is a democracy, and from what I have read they were never even talked to by Israel. Maybe if they had gone to the government a solution that didn't involve killing hundreds of innocent people could have been reached. By the way % of dems in the US is WAY greater then the number of Hez in Lebanon. It would be like if the Green party attacked China more then if the Dems did.

No, because Hez has a majority of the army of Lebannon. It is the same scenario, Hez and the Lebannon government ruled Lebannon.

I would ask you why Israel would speak with them after having asked for years for them to control Hez? What is more talk going to do when it did nothing the last 6 years?

So would China be justified in retaliating if the Democrats took a portion of the military (which the would control in this scenario) and attacked China, and the Republicans (who have the other military portion) did nothing about it, or even tried to do anything about it?

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: Czar

Originally posted by: RichardE

Originally posted by: Pacemaker

Originally posted by: Googer

Originally posted by: alchemize
Troll?

He needs to stop posting enemy propaganda. That video tries to compaire 2006 Lebanon with 1941 London. And honstly there is no comparison. Lebanon is the agressor and shall be held accountable/resposible for allowing hesballah to operate on it's soil.

So if a terrorist from New York attacked Canada, then Canada would be justified in destroying America?s entire Infrastructure? After all we "allowed" them to operate on our soil.

However, comparing it to London 1941 is a little low. In 1941 it was pretty clear who started things. Now, in 2006 who started this? Hard to say, Israel has been holding people without trials (think gitmo) from Lebanon (and other Arab countries) for years, but it being done to 2 of their citizens is more then they can take. Personally I think both sides are wrong.

If the democrats attacked China, and the republicans sat back and did nothing, would China be justified in retaliating? That is a better scenario since Hez is part of the Lebannon government.

small part of the government, a move which was done to disarm hezbollah in time, giving them a voice and another chance to be heard without using violence

Why is that always skipped over?

Hez are more or less in control of Lebannon. The Lebaneese army did nothing to stop Hez from attacking Israel. The Lebannese government sat back and watched Hez attack Israel than when Israel complained gave face saving statements. Why is that skipped over?