WaPo & ATP&N exposes pure hypocrisy of GOP base

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,547
20,262
146
So the real story here is now the absolute denial the GOP base is in. Delusional doesn't even begin to describe it.

What the actual Fsck?
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,838
20,433
146
Alt-fact generator: denial, and river in egypt, which wasn't on the Muslim ban list, so it's cool.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,982
33,664
136
Obama did nothing. Time for a change.

I personally think the US should have acted then and maybe things would be better now.
I do not think that the numbers posted in the OP mean anything like what is implied.
You seem to forget Obama went to Congress for a new AUMF so he could act and Republicans refused.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,082
136
5 years after those threads, we are STILL stuck In Iraq and Afghanistan.
I don't see how we can fight all these wars at once. We don't have a massive standing army, and nobody is going to vote for a draft. And lord knows Donnie isn't able to win anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

bshole

Diamond Member
Mar 12, 2013
8,315
1,215
126

Today will be remembered as the day that ivwshane OWNED the internet. You sir have entered the pantheon.......

This post probably illustrates a greater truth. I imagine if you ask all the Republicans who support intervention now what they thought four years ago, they will respond exactly like PCGEEK did. They will misremember and state that actually they did support intervention back then.

Bottom line, kudos to the majority of Democrats for opposing in both instances. Shame on the Republicans for putting political party before national interests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
88,265
55,847
136
DSF with the exact same hypocrisy as PCGeek, and bailing from the thread after it's pointed out.

https://forums.anandtech.com/thread...-attack-in-syria.2503077/page-8#post-38834665

Guys, there's something called a "search engine" on this board. You can avoid further humiliation by taking that into consideration before you flap your gums.

More importantly (you would think) would be that these people don't seem interested in reflecting on why they have changed their opinions so radically despite no significant change in the situation other than what party controls the presidency. They routinely call others liars, hacks, etc and don't seem to notice that they're doing everything they accuse other people of. It's not like this is an isolated case either.

People are weird, they prize tribal identity over facts, I imagine that's what's happening in this case. The question I have now though is why tribal identity is so much stronger among conservatives than among liberals?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie

trenchfoot

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
16,148
8,744
136
For many conservatives (not pcgeek specifically) their primary reason for being from that side of the aisle makes being hypocritical a "yeah, so what?" kind of deal. There's no shame in it, there's no pause for reflection. It's either accepting the fact that being hypocritical is part and parcel of being conservative in thought and action, or not being a conservative at all. Example: Obamacare is a despicable attack on the principle of free choice but the Affordable Care Act and its model Romneycare is good and must not be repealed/replaced. Or, the infamous Southern Strategy, Bush 43 agreeing with the Iraqi gov't to leave Iraq is OK, but Obama following through on that agreement is bad, the gov't should stay out of our lives but don't you dare take away my social security, medicare and on and on and on.

Being conservative is not so much having to be hypocritical to tow the party line, being hypocritical is inconsequential. It's a minor inconvenience that has no bearing on how things should be handled or looked upon. If it's good for the Party, then what's the big deal about it? If it wins elections being that way, then really, what's the problem?

It's acceptable. It's OK. The only thing that matters is that their party stays in power, in control of things so that they can feel safe and secure in this knowledge no matter how badly they get affected by the loyalty they place in the party.
 

repoman0

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2010
5,191
4,574
136
I wonder if pcgeek is off on a retreat reflecting and contemplating his existence, wondering why his view of the world is dictated entirely by political party and the views of others rather than his own independent thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarthKyrie