DisgruntledVirus
Lifer
Get one of these for your vehicle
So I work for one of the top 5 insurance companies in the US in P&C. When I got to work today, I get online to head to AT. Our homepages are locked to our companies internal homepage, and I see this electronic square box in a big graphic on the front page. It says "(company) expands telematics testing program". So I click on the link to see what this is all about, and here is an excerpt from the article (obviously can't link to it due to an internal website only available on the intranet).
Basically what companies want to do now (on an opt-in basis, under the guise "You'll get lower rates if you use it!!!"), is put small computers with an rf chip in it in your car to monitor your driving. This then sends the information over some rf medium (like cell towers), to the company you have insurance with. Then they use this to rate your driving more accurately.
While I am 100% for rating people for the risk they are and safer driving, I am not a fan of this idea. It seems too big brother-ish to me.
edit: the second poll wording got edited for clarity
So I work for one of the top 5 insurance companies in the US in P&C. When I got to work today, I get online to head to AT. Our homepages are locked to our companies internal homepage, and I see this electronic square box in a big graphic on the front page. It says "(company) expands telematics testing program". So I click on the link to see what this is all about, and here is an excerpt from the article (obviously can't link to it due to an internal website only available on the intranet).
?These devices can capture very specific information about the driving habits of individuals in a way that improves rating accuracy and underwriting, while significantly increasing both the frequency and quality of our interactions with customers. We also believe that telematics has tremendous potential for saving lives and reducing losses.?
This safety-enhancing potential serves as the central focus of (company name) investigation of telematics. More than 100 employees are currently testing devices in their vehicles, and preliminary results provide strong evidence to support (company name) direction. In one test, the percentage of safe-zone drivers (those with a significantly infrequent rate of urgent starts, stops or swerves) jumped from 24 percent to 75 percent.
?We?re encouraging our employees to be highly engaged not only in using telematics to improve their driving, but in using their experiences to help us improve telematics,? Warden said. ?We believe that current telematics technology has a great deal of promise, but we?re also interested in finding ways to improve it.?
While the bulk of the industry?s telematics discussion has so far centered on its ability to help reduce the cost of insurance, (company name) program is designed to also explore a wider range of the technology?s value-added possibilities, such as providing traffic pattern information, real-time driving analysis and ways to increase fuel efficiency.
Basically what companies want to do now (on an opt-in basis, under the guise "You'll get lower rates if you use it!!!"), is put small computers with an rf chip in it in your car to monitor your driving. This then sends the information over some rf medium (like cell towers), to the company you have insurance with. Then they use this to rate your driving more accurately.
While I am 100% for rating people for the risk they are and safer driving, I am not a fan of this idea. It seems too big brother-ish to me.
edit: the second poll wording got edited for clarity