• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Want a job? Give me your facebook/Google/forum passwords & login info

Status
Not open for further replies.

NoStateofMind

Diamond Member
Looks like some in Montana are smoking more than cigarettes if you ask me. There's no way in HELL I'll ever hand over that kind of information for a job. What say you?

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=15465

Bozeman request: Big brother snooping, or legitimate request?

The city of Bozeman, with a population of 25,000 people in southwestern Montana, likely isn't one you heard of recently. However, it's in the news after a city job requirement has drawn heavy criticism over possible privacy issues.

An anonymous citizen who applied for a city job alerted local media that he or she had to provide log-in information and passwords for any and all social networking web sites they use while applying for a job with the city.

Along with the normal background check, criminal history, education and employment past, the following is written into the Bozeman city employment waiver statement:

"Please list any and all, current personal or business websites, web pages or memberships on any internet-based chat rooms, social clubs or forums, to include, but not limited to: Facebook, Google, Yahoo, YouTube.com, MySpace, etc."

The application also gives room for three different web sites, account names and passwords, according to the applicant.

There are obvious privacy concerns related to what the city is attempting to do here, regardless of whether or not an applicant has something possibly incriminating posted on a social networking web site.

In Article 2, Section 10 of the Montana Constitution, it says "the right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest."

"So, we have positions ranging from fire and police, which require people of high integrity for those positions, all the way down to the lifeguards and the folks that work in city hall here," Bozeman city attorney Greg Sullivan told local media. "So we do those types of investigations to make sure the people that we hire have the highest moral character and are a good fit for the City."

Read more news articles at DailyTech
 
I like when I have to call tech support and give them passwords, since I always use things like "eatmyass".

What would the password be needed for? I could see asking about what screen names you use (not that I'd give it). But asking for passwords, I don't get it.
 
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
I like when I have to call tech support and give them passwords, since I always use things like "eatmyass".

What would the password be needed for? I could see asking about what screen names you use (not that I'd give it). But asking for passwords, I don't get it.

Where i used to Work, the time that my buddy worked helpdesk we had a group of users that would always forget their passwords or lock their account out. The users would complain about the Password Requirements

So they would reset their passwords to " Velcr0shoes"
 
I can see giving information that is *publically available* for them to review, but to give them your passwords in addition to that is over the top.
 
Originally posted by: her209
If you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?

Ah the token "Nothing to hide" person.

You don't see a problem with letting others access all your private accounts? Read your e-mail? View your protected photos?

Maybe they leak info on you, or sell the account info even...
 
Originally posted by: TruePaige
Originally posted by: her209
If you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?

Ah the token "Nothing to hide" person.

You don't see a problem with letting others access all your private accounts? Read your e-mail? View your protected photos?

Maybe they leak info on you, or sell the account info even...

I have to think her209 was being sarcastic. I'd hope no one actually believed that would be an intelligent argument.
 
Phew, I thought for a moment there they were making you give up your DailyTech login credentials based on the subtitle, glad it is only the unimportant sites.
 
Originally posted by: her209
If you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?

Just because something isn't anything to hide doesn't mean it still shouldn't be private. A good example might be nude pics of you/S.O. There's nothing to hide there, nothing illegal, nothing wrong. It's still private, still something nobody else has the right to see without permission. Hence right to privacy.

Even if you do have something to hide, something illegal, I would say this falls under your right not to incriminate yourself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top