• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Walter Reed Army General Fired

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Text

By ROBERT BURNS, AP Military Writer 1 hour, 7 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Army said Thursday that the two-star general in charge of Walter Reed Army Medical Center has been relieved of command following disclosures about inadequate treatment of wounded soldiers.

The firing of Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman, who was commanding general of the North Atlantic Regional Medical Command as well as Walter Reed hospital, was announced by Army Secretary Francis J. Harvey.

In a brief announcement, the Army said service leaders had "lost trust and confidence" in Weightman's leadership abilities "to address needed solutions for soldier outpatient care." He had headed Walter Reed since Aug. 25, 2006.

The Army and the Defense Department launched a series of investigations after The Washington Post published a series of stories last week that documented problems in soldiers' housing and in the medical bureaucracy at Walter Reed, which has been called the Army's premier caregiver for soldiers wounded in
Iraq and
Afghanistan.

After a visit to the hospital compound last Friday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said those found to have been responsible for the problems at Walter Reed would be "held accountable."

On Thursday he issued a brief statement endorsing Harvey's action.

"The care and welfare of our wounded men and women in uniform demand the highest standard of excellence and commitment that we can muster as a government," Gates said. "When this standard is not met, I will insist on swift and direct corrective action and, where appropriate, accountability up the chain of command."

It was not clear whether Gates insisted on Weightman's firing. A Pentagon official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said Gates was "actively involved" in the firing decision.

A Pentagon spokesman, Bryan Whitman, said before Weightman's firing was announced that an outside review panel created by Gates was holding its first meeting Friday at the Pentagon. Headed by two former Army secretaries, Togo West and Jack Marsh, the panel is to review treatment and administrative processes at Walter Reed and at the National Naval Medical Center at Bethesda, Md. Gates has instructed the group to report its findings publicly within 45 days.

Being relieved of command means Weightman is almost certain to have lost his future in the Army.

A native of Vermont, he graduated from West Point in 1973 and got his medical degree from the University of Vermont. He later served as the surgeon for the 82nd Airborne Division, including during Desert Storm.

He has held a number of medical commands, including service as a leading surgeon during the initial stages of the Iraq war.

Weightman's duties at Walter Reed will be assumed temporarily by Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley, the commander of U.S. Medical Command, until a permanent replacement is found, Harvey said.

"The Army is moving quickly to address issues regarding outpatient care at Walter Reed Army Medical Center," the announcement said.

Last week the Army took disciplinary action against several lower-level soldiers at Walter Reed, but officials have declined to publicly confirm any details of those actions.

The problems at Walter Reed pertain not to the quality of medical treatment for wounded soldiers but rather to the level of care for those who are well enough to be outpatients, living in Army housing at Walter Reed. One building was singled out in the Post reports as suffering from ill-repair, including mold on interior walls.

The Army also has acknowledged problems with the system it uses to evaluate wounded soldiers in determining whether they are well enough to return to active duty.

At a breakfast meeting with reporters Thursday, in which he refused to discuss any aspect of the Walter Reed investigations, Harvey said the Army also was reviewing conditions at its medical centers elsewhere in the country. He would not be more specific.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As 'advanced' as our military is, with the latest laser-guided bombs, state-of-the-art planes and high-tech gadgets...as huge as our military budget is (the largest in the world by a mile, not including the hundreds of billions in separate funds for Iraq)...we continue to treat the military politicians and the contractors like Gods while our soldiers scrape by with the bare minimum.

This general was given command of a facility in poor condition, and received the funds needed to keep it running and little more. Now that ****** hits the fan about poor conditions, our leaders decide to save face by firing him?
 
Originally posted by: jpeyton
This general was given command of a facility in poor condition, and received the funds needed to keep it running and little more.

Now that *hit the fan about poor conditions, our leaders decide to save face by firing him?

Is he Democrat or Republican?
 
Bushco Needed A "Fall Guy
Is Bush somehow personally responsibile for this that he needs a fall guy?
Perhaps the general in charge there was actually doing a bad job running the place?
 
While The Presence makes a valid point---and this Weightman may be a total boob---being in command of a sinking ship since August 25, 2006 does qualify him to be a probable scapegoat---since Walter Reed has been underfunded by GWB&co. long before. As a co-worker of mine used to remark--you can't make chicken soup out of chicken sh!t.

But its just another chilling message to our armed forces with its typical go along culture---that they better speak out against higher command stupidity---or find themselves in a damned if you do and damned if you don't-----and the unlucky few get to be scapegoats.

Methinks our armed forces will be very happy to see GWB&co out of office. They are catching the hell and can't even get decent medical care if they are wounded---the only true measure of support our troops.
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: jpeyton
This general was given command of a facility in poor condition, and received the funds needed to keep it running and little more.

Now that *hit the fan about poor conditions, our leaders decide to save face by firing him?

Is he Democrat or Republican?

Answer; Military.😛

 
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
That's what he gets for trying to siphon money away from the war on terra.

Actually this was not a funding issue, it was an incompetence one. The money was there if they needed it, but they failed to use it. The Army is like any large corporation, filled with completely moronic managers from top to bottom. Sure, there are some great ones, but they are so rare that overall their voices are drowned out.
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
While The Presence makes a valid point---and this Weightman may be a total boob---being in command of a sinking ship since August 25, 2006 does qualify him to be a probable scapegoat---since Walter Reed has been underfunded by GWB&co. long before. As a co-worker of mine used to remark--you can't make chicken soup out of chicken sh!t.

But its just another chilling message to our armed forces with its typical go along culture---that they better speak out against higher command stupidity---or find themselves in a damned if you do and damned if you don't-----and the unlucky few get to be scapegoats.

Methinks our armed forces will be very happy to see GWB&co out of office. They are catching the hell and can't even get decent medical care if they are wounded---the only true measure of support our troops.

Yes Walter Reed was so unfunded it is getting new facilities and old facitiies will be closed in the next few years. Maybe congress should step up and expedite the closure?

Was this general at fault? IF he was in direct charge of this facility, its care ultimately up to him. Did this general request more funds to fix these problems and was denied? Did he mismanage funds? Or was it just simply to broke to fix?
 
so the Gen was fired from his post.

is he gone from the army (like being fired employee) or restationed?

or honaBLE discharge?

or?
 
Originally posted by: JEDI
so the Gen was fired from his post.

is he gone from the army (like being fired employee) or restationed?

or honaBLE discharge?

or?

More likely promoted and given a Freedom Medal (along with a huge raise)
 
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
That's what he gets for trying to siphon money away from the war on terra.

Actually this was not a funding issue, it was an incompetence one. The money was there if they needed it, but they failed to use it. The Army is like any large corporation, filled with completely moronic managers from top to bottom. Sure, there are some great ones, but they are so rare that overall their voices are drowned out.

Pretty much summed it up right there. The amount of red tape and bureaucratic bullshit that goes on in the Army is insane. There really is no streamlined method to complete anything. And it usually is the guy up top, whether he is culpable or not, who becomes the fall guy; face saving (CYA) move by others.
 
Hey, they volunteered to liberate Iraq. Now they get shot up and are whining about mold in their room? Hey, they're alive aren't they??!!

Send their sorry asses back to Iraq and put them on the front line, that'll stop the whining.







<sarcasm off>
 
Another palehorse74 gem---Just be happy they fired him, hope the next person does a better job, and move on.

I disagree----its important that the public know if the guy was demoted for just cause or is just plain being scapegoated---which prevents placing the real blame where it belongs.

Since no real facts are being presented to answer the question of incompetence Vs. being scapegoated, its best to reserve judgment.

So let the truth come out---and the blame fairly placed.
 
Originally posted by: Lemon law
Another palehorse74 gem---Just be happy they fired him, hope the next person does a better job, and move on.

I disagree----its important that the public know if the guy was demoted for just cause or is just plain being scapegoated---which prevents placing the real blame where it belongs.

Since no real facts are being presented to answer the question of incompetence Vs. being scapegoated, its best to reserve judgment.

So let the truth come out---and the blame fairly placed.
Scapegoat for the Army system.

 
The dude was only running the place for 6 months. The solders were telling every one how bad it was for past 5 years. So yeah, blame it on that guy! 🙂

Ommm, how much you want to bet that this is all a feel good measure and as soon as 6 months pass it will be right back down to substandard levels once again.

For those who think anything good comes from this .... I seriously doubt it. Yeah we might put a few more billion in the fund for vet hospitals that pretty much all of them around the USA are in poor / run down condition... Then after the media is done with the feel good stories as soon as they need to cut guess where they will find some extra money? Every time we spend more money here at home we are talking money away from bushes Iraq agenda can't have that!
 
Originally posted by: ericlp
The dude was only running the place for 6 months. The solders were telling every one how bad it was for past 5 years. So yeah, blame it on that guy! 🙂

It's not the REPUBLICAN WAY.... instead they put Lt. Gen. Kevin Kiley back in charge of Walter Reed where he was in charge before Weightman.

"Immediately before his current assignment, LTG Kiley was commander of Walter Reed Army Medical Center and North Atlantic Regional Medical Command and Lead Agent for Region I. "

 
Army Secretary Harvey just got canned by Gates for putting Kiley in charge.
I would expect the Kiley will also be on his way out.
 
Originally posted by: EagleKeeper
Army Secretary Harvey just got canned by Gates for putting Kiley in charge.
I would expect the Kiley will also be on his way out.

Kiley's as good as gone now - Gates is pissed that the Army Secretary allowed him back into a position where he initially allowed this mess to begin.


Looks like Pete Schoomaker would be the best choice as the the one to go in and clean up this situation.
Maybe Gates can break the 'Rumsfeld/Bush' lock-step marching order with Pete's help.

Schoo should be able to get things back on track, he does his job, and tactfully makes his point of view known to the hierarchy.

 
Sec of defense Gates just fired a shot across the bow to the army's business as usual culture when he fired Harvey also. Looks like this struck a GWB&co. hypersensitive nerve and they are pulling all the stops out on scapegoating. This could get interesting---time for some congressional hearings
 
Originally posted by: JEDI
so the Gen was fired from his post.

is he gone from the army (like being fired employee) or restationed?

or honaBLE discharge?

or?


yeah what happens to Weightman & Kiley now ? they still get full pensions ?
 
Originally posted by: Stifko
Originally posted by: JEDI
so the Gen was fired from his post.

is he gone from the army (like being fired employee) or restationed?

or honaBLE discharge?

or?


yeah what happens to Weightman & Kiley now ? they still get full pensions ?
They will get the full pensions - such actions are considered being forced to retire. Their future for any advancement is now shot.

 
Back
Top