Walmart to Make Upscale Move

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,138
18,685
146
Looking Upscale,
Wal-Mart Begins a Big Makeover

As American Economy Shifts,
Retailer Redesigns Stores
And Tries to Be Trendier


By ANN ZIMMERMAN and KRIS HUDSON
Staff Reporters of the Wall Street Journal
September 17, 2005; Page A1

Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has begun a fundamental rethinking of the formula that made it the world's largest retailer.

Wal-Mart grew enormous by cramming its shelves with merchandise at the lowest prices possible. Now, responding to big shifts it sees in the American economy, it is changing the way it does business to reach out to more upscale shoppers.

This month, Wal-Mart unveiled an eight-page advertising spread in Vogue that uncharacteristically emphasized fashion, such as a leopard-print tank top with pink lace, instead of price. On Monday night, the huge public screen in Times Square will display video from Wal-Mart's first New York fashion show. The Bentonville, Ark., company even has a trend-spotting outpost now in the U.S. fashion capital.

Wal-Mart has created a store prototype with wider aisles, lower shelves and more elegant displays of pricey products. The retailer once prided itself on selling the first DVD player under $100. Now it also offers 42-inch flat-panel plasma TVs for $1,648 to $1,998.

It's a significant gamble, because lower-income rural shoppers have always been the core customers of this nearly $300 billion-a-year company -- bigger than any other nonoil company, measured by sales. In 2004, Wal-Mart sales represented 7.58% of all nonauto U.S. retail sales. William Cody, managing director of the Baker Retailing Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, says Wal-Mart is the most dominant retailer in U.S. history in terms of sales as a percentage of gross domestic product.

But Wal-Mart needs to shake things up. Its sales at stores open at least a year, a key measure of retailing performance, have been lagging. Over the past year, such sales at more fashionable Target Corp. have been rising twice as fast as those at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart's share price, which hit a 52-week low yesterday, is down 17% in the past year, while Target's has risen 18%.

The sense of crisis sank in last holiday season. During December, Wal-Mart stores were instructed to display items under $2 in the prominent places at the end of aisles, in an appeal to financially squeezed shoppers. But sales were disappointing. "We went the wrong direction," Wal-Mart Chief Executive Lee Scott told analysts this June, reflecting on the failure. "You can't just spend all your time chasing a customer who is going through that economic cycle."

Across its 3,100-store empire, Wal-Mart is deploying a 340-person squad to enforce new "rack rules." In a Wal-Mart supercenter in Cullman, Ala., Joel Ewing recently snatched a group of peach-colored, beaded tunics from a circular rack and put them on a rack with four outspread arms.

The four-way racks hold fewer items but allow shoppers to glimpse a garment's style and detail. "Putting out less merchandise can translate into more sales, because customers can really see what you have," explained Mr. Ewing as he surveyed departments with the store manager in tow. "But here, that is not an easy lesson to teach."

Wal-Mart's predicament reflects broader changes in the U.S. The country's uneven economic recovery over the past couple of years has benefited high-income Americans more than the traditional Wal-Mart customer, who values price over image. Even before Hurricane Katrina pushed gasoline over $3 a gallon, rising pump prices were having a disproportionate effect on working-class Americans because fuel represents a much bigger slice of their budgets.

Executives now say Wal-Mart needs to appeal to the shopper who loves a great deal on socks but also can splurge on merchandise with fatter profit margins, such as 400-thread-count sheets or a stereo.

Where Wal-Mart's mantra was once "stack it high, watch it fly," its fashion police have a new set of rules. There's the "one-hand rule": Racks shouldn't be stuffed so full that shoppers have to tug at a hanger with both hands. All racks should be 4-feet, 6-inches tall, so shoppers can see over them to apparel hanging on the walls. Thirty-six inches should separate one rack from another.

After surveying its customers and concluding they were "starved for fashion," Wal-Mart has started to bring in more stylish merchandise. The company still does all its apparel buying out of Bentonville. But two years ago, it opened the New York office, located on Fifth Avenue near the Empire State Building, to spot hot styles. Last year, the office persuaded headquarters to take a chance on long, patterned skirts embellished with sequins. They sold out in all stores within weeks.

"Fashion and creativity are not centered in Bentonville," says Celia Clancy, a Wellesley College graduate and former employee of Filene's Department Store, who runs strategic planning for the New York office. "To excel and be credible in apparel and home furnishings, this had to happen."

In the current Vogue ads -- part of a two-year, $12 million deal -- real-life customers pair fashionable Wal-Mart clothes with their own accessories.

Still, the company must be careful not to alienate its traditional base. Other retailers have flopped in pursuing growth outside their areas of expertise. A decade ago, J.C. Penney, the midmarket department-store chain, failed to woo new customers and alienated old ones when it tried to go upscale. Wal-Mart may also face a challenge squeezing suppliers for the last dollar of savings as it sells a plusher image.

Wal-Mart has been trying to improve the quality and style of its apparel and home furnishings for years, but its efforts seem to come in fits and starts. Three years ago, it introduced the George line of apparel from its unit in Britain, where it had sold briskly for a decade. But the company never promoted George here and buried the stylish office and weekend wear in disorderly apparel sections.

"We did focus groups with thousands of women and their biggest dislike was the mess on the floor," says Claire Watts, executive vice president of product development in apparel and home furnishings.

Many shoppers simply don't associate Wal-Mart with fashionable clothes. Caroline Geppert, a 36-year-old stay-at-home mom from McKinney, Texas, regularly shops at Wal-Mart for clothing for her daughters, but not for herself or her husband. "I've been surprised going to Target and seeing some things that I would buy and wear, whereas in Wal-Mart I usually wouldn't buy anything other than socks or underwear or a basic T-shirt," says Ms. Geppert, who formerly worked as a lawyer.

Wal-Mart has been slow to get all the pieces of fashion merchandising in place. Most apparel retailers have fashion planners whose job is to quickly halt production of styles that aren't selling well and rush to get more of popular items. Wal-Mart didn't have such planners until it recently hired 33 of them. It long treated all apparel in the same way as underwear or polyester pants with elastic waistbands, where demand is fairly steady. As it began hawking clothes in more trend-sensitive categories, the absence of planning led to a buildup of inventory and a rash of markdowns that hurt 2004 sales and profits.

This summer Lisa Waltuch, the New York office's top design guru, spotted young women in long, knit gaucho pants on 34th Street in Manhattan. Ms. Waltuch checked local stores in New York and found the garments were sold out. She put out a bulletin to Wal-Mart's Late Developing Items team in Bentonville. The gauchos will hit Wal-Mart stores this fall, faster than the typical six-month lead time.

Surveying shoppers, the trend office identified a customer Wal-Mart isn't reaching. They call her Gracie. She's at least 25 and spends a high percentage of her disposable income on fashion apparel. This month, a new private label brand of high fashion targeting Gracie will arrive in 500 urban Wal-Mart stores.

For years, Wal-Mart advertised relatively little, believing that low prices spoke louder than any commercial. What advertising it did emphasized "everyday low prices" and "rollbacks," or permanent price cuts. Television ads featured a yellow smiley-face character bouncing around the store and slashing prices. That approach seemed to work as Wal-Mart devastated retailers such as Sears and Kmart that had higher costs and less-efficient distribution.

But the constant emphasis on bargains turned off many affluent shoppers. And the frenzied advertising seemed to echo the long lines and busy aisles that can make shopping at Wal-Mart an ordeal.

One spot last holiday season featured the Gingerbread Man character from the movie Shrek 2 careening around a store. The ad hit all the themes Wal-Mart told its ad agencies to reflect -- low prices, happy employees, a wide selection -- but it made Julie Lyle, a vice president of marketing at Wal-Mart, feel exhausted. She feared weary holiday shoppers would feel the same.

Under Ms. Lyle, who is now on leave, and a new chief marketing officer, John Fleming, Wal-Mart crafted calmer ads. One spot shows small girls walking down their bedroom hallway wrapped in oversize towels. Another features Trish, a customer in her home, describing how she found low-priced yet contemporary decorating materials at Wal-Mart.

With the ads now running nationally, the challenge is to make the stores match the image. If higher-income shoppers are lured to the stores only to find the familiar drabness, they're not likely to give Wal-Mart a second chance.

In early June, Wal-Mart opened a prototype supercenter in Rogers, Ark., that targets the new demographic. Among the changes: wider aisles, mock hardwood floors and skylights. Stereo systems are on display rather than left in boxes.

Then there are the shelves. In older stores, all are 7-feet high, sometimes with merchandise stacked above that. The new prototype in Rogers strategically places 4-foot, 6-inch shelves among higher displays. One shelf of small kitchen appliances is kept low so shoppers can see over it to the aisle of pans and kitchen utensils.

"The aisles are wider and it's not as crowded," said Amy Cooper, a Rogers homemaker, loading her 8-year-old son and 6-year-old daughter into a minivan. "It seems cleaner."

Wal-Mart says the new store stocks just as many items as older ones. To make up for the extra space on the sales floor, it slashed backroom space by tweaking its delivery schedule so the store only needed one receiving dock instead of the usual two.

The new sales strategy is showing early results, Wal-Mart says. In McKinney, Texas, a suburb of Dallas, Wal-Mart manager Brent Allen says his two-month-old supercenter has seen a "high-double-digit percentage increase" in its sales of big-screen and flat-screen television sets, compared with a smaller store that used to be across the street. The sets are easy to see on a wall with less merchandise packed around them. Mr. Allen has noticed healthy sales of artichoke hearts and filet mignon. He doubled the floor space in his wine department after customers kept emptying the shelves.

"I think we have a more well-rounded income level that is visiting the store now," Mr. Allen said.

Wal-Mart's immense size, however, means it will be a long time before the prototype store is the norm. Wal-Mart plans to open roughly 100 supercenters modeled on the prototype this year, just 3% of the total.

That's why the retailer is trying to shake up old stores too. In the Cullman, Ala., store, Mr. Ewing, the fashion merchandiser, noticed a violation of the "rack rule" that says clothing bottoms should be placed directly under tops. He spotted a wall where $22.82 jewel-toned blouses were displayed above matching $17.57 plaid skirts, but the skirts were facing sideways. He straightened them out.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
it still doesnt solve the problem with their "low cost operator" philosophy that leads them to low quality goods, understaffed stores, and poor worker pay and benefits.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Acanthus
it still doesnt solve the problem with their "low cost operator" philosophy that leads them to low quality goods, understaffed stores, and poor worker pay and benefits.

That wasn't a problem, that was pure profit. The problem was the morons figuring it out. I should have sold the goddamn stock WAY earlier this year. Walmart has lost me 6,891.50 dollars since the middle of February. Of course, this was after massive profit, but that's how much they are down for me based on ownership of 770 shares. A good 20% drop. Damn, I might just sell it today, but I'm hoping for some type of spring to minimize losses before dropping it.

Nice loss for tax purposes if sold now, but that game sucks.
 

Acanthus

Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
19,915
2
76
ostif.org
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Acanthus
it still doesnt solve the problem with their "low cost operator" philosophy that leads them to low quality goods, understaffed stores, and poor worker pay and benefits.

That wasn't a problem, that was pure profit. The problem was the morons figuring it out. I should have sold the goddamn stock WAY earlier this year. Walmart has lost me 6,891.50 dollars since the middle of February. Of course, this was after massive profit, but that's how much they are down for me based on ownership of 770 shares. A good 20% drop. Damn, I might just sell it today, but I'm hoping for some type of spring to minimize losses before dropping it.

Nice loss for tax purposes if sold now, but that game sucks.

There is nothing but doom and gloom on the sams club end of the compnay.

The idiots are overexpanding locally and starving out their own business, and cutting staff and costs at each store to cover the losses in sales from buidlilng new stores all over the city.

In a city of 150,000 people, we now have 8 walmarts and a sams club in the metropolitan area.

Now im no MBA, but if you have 6 walmarts and a sams club, then you build 2 new walmarts, and sales drop 7% (my store) WHERE THE HELL DO YOU THINK THE SALES ARE GOING?!
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Acanthus
it still doesnt solve the problem with their "low cost operator" philosophy that leads them to low quality goods, understaffed stores, and poor worker pay and benefits.

That wasn't a problem, that was pure profit. The problem was the morons figuring it out. I should have sold the goddamn stock WAY earlier this year. Walmart has lost me 6,891.50 dollars since the middle of February. Of course, this was after massive profit, but that's how much they are down for me based on ownership of 770 shares. A good 20% drop. Damn, I might just sell it today, but I'm hoping for some type of spring to minimize losses before dropping it.

Nice loss for tax purposes if sold now, but that game sucks.

There is nothing but doom and gloom on the sams club end of the compnay.

The idiots are overexpanding locally and starving out their own business, and cutting staff and costs at each store to cover the losses in sales from buidlilng new stores all over the city.

In a city of 150,000 people, we now have 8 walmarts and a sams club in the metropolitan area.

Now im no MBA, but if you have 6 walmarts and a sams club, then you build 2 new walmarts, and sales drop 7% (my store) WHERE THE HELL DO YOU THINK THE SALES ARE GOING?!

Rather bizzare. Birmingham is slightly overbuilt in the manner of Walmarts and Sam's Clubs, but not to that degree.

Bah, Sam's Club is a pox upon society. Costco has a much better business model -- well not profit wise -- but sonsumer and employee wise.
 

Willoughbyva

Diamond Member
Sep 26, 2001
3,267
0
0
Perhaps walmart is looking to battle it out with Target? Perhaps it thinks it can create a better trendier image sort of like Target and make more money. Plus it won't have to deal with the image it currently has of being a bad company to work for and bad for local economies.

I usually buy groceries at walmart because it is cheaper. I like target stores better. Kmart is just a turn off all together, however I kind of like Sears.
 

PlatinumGold

Lifer
Aug 11, 2000
23,168
0
71
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Acanthus
it still doesnt solve the problem with their "low cost operator" philosophy that leads them to low quality goods, understaffed stores, and poor worker pay and benefits.

That wasn't a problem, that was pure profit. The problem was the morons figuring it out. I should have sold the goddamn stock WAY earlier this year. Walmart has lost me 6,891.50 dollars since the middle of February. Of course, this was after massive profit, but that's how much they are down for me based on ownership of 770 shares. A good 20% drop. Damn, I might just sell it today, but I'm hoping for some type of spring to minimize losses before dropping it.

Nice loss for tax purposes if sold now, but that game sucks.

There is nothing but doom and gloom on the sams club end of the compnay.

The idiots are overexpanding locally and starving out their own business, and cutting staff and costs at each store to cover the losses in sales from buidlilng new stores all over the city.

In a city of 150,000 people, we now have 8 walmarts and a sams club in the metropolitan area.

Now im no MBA, but if you have 6 walmarts and a sams club, then you build 2 new walmarts, and sales drop 7% (my store) WHERE THE HELL DO YOU THINK THE SALES ARE GOING?!

that and the fact that Costco is KICKING THEIR @SSES. I hate Sams Club and Walmart. it warms my heart that Costco and Target is beating them.

 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,138
18,685
146
Originally posted by: Acanthus
Originally posted by: Mill
Originally posted by: Acanthus
it still doesnt solve the problem with their "low cost operator" philosophy that leads them to low quality goods, understaffed stores, and poor worker pay and benefits.

That wasn't a problem, that was pure profit. The problem was the morons figuring it out. I should have sold the goddamn stock WAY earlier this year. Walmart has lost me 6,891.50 dollars since the middle of February. Of course, this was after massive profit, but that's how much they are down for me based on ownership of 770 shares. A good 20% drop. Damn, I might just sell it today, but I'm hoping for some type of spring to minimize losses before dropping it.

Nice loss for tax purposes if sold now, but that game sucks.

There is nothing but doom and gloom on the sams club end of the compnay.

The idiots are overexpanding locally and starving out their own business, and cutting staff and costs at each store to cover the losses in sales from buidlilng new stores all over the city.

In a city of 150,000 people, we now have 8 walmarts and a sams club in the metropolitan area.

Now im no MBA, but if you have 6 walmarts and a sams club, then you build 2 new walmarts, and sales drop 7% (my store) WHERE THE HELL DO YOU THINK THE SALES ARE GOING?!

http://www.walmart.com/storeLocator/ca_...te=PA&sfsearch_zip=&continue=&x=41&y=8

I count four Walmarts in Erie.
 

vi edit

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Oct 28, 1999
62,484
8,345
126
that and the fact that Costco is KICKING THEIR @SSES. I hate Sams Club and Walmart. it warms my heart that Costco and Target is beating them.

:thumbsup:

Only thing Omaha is really missing retail wise is a Costco. Des Moines, IA which is a lot smaller and 2.5 hours east of us, has one. But we don't. :(
 

NogginBoink

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
5,322
0
0
Util Wal-Mart can hire courteous employees who are knowlegeable about their inventory they'll fail to lure the higher demographics.

That, IMO, is the real problem with this proposal. (It's a side-effect of low pay, which I don't think is a problem at all. People with no skills get low pay. It's called capitalism. Get some employees with people skills and pay 'em more and retain 'em if you want to go after the higher demographic. But that throws the low-cost strategy out the window. I don't see how you can do both.)
 

AnyMal

Lifer
Nov 21, 2001
15,780
0
76
Monkey see, monkey do.... All our local (Louisville, KY) Target and Meijer stores have been recently renovated to gain the "upscale" look. It was only a matter of time for Wal-Mart to follow suit.

That said, it's also only a matter of time for the usual Wal-Mart clientelle to ruin whatever renovation Walm-Mart is going to undertake.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Amused
Topic Title: Walmart to Make Upscale Move
Topic Summary: Looking Upscale, Wal-Mart Begins a Big Makeover--As Economy Shifts, Retailer Redesigns Stores And Tries to Be Trendier

Thank God

This will be the end of Wally World and maybe we can have REAL commerce again in the U.S.
 

AnonymouseUser

Diamond Member
May 14, 2003
9,943
107
106
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Amused
Topic Title: Walmart to Make Upscale Move
Topic Summary: Looking Upscale, Wal-Mart Begins a Big Makeover--As Economy Shifts, Retailer Redesigns Stores And Tries to Be Trendier

Thank God

This will be the end of Wally World and maybe we can have REAL commerce again in the U.S.

I hope so too, but we can only wish. :(
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
61,912
17,664
136
I don't know that it will work... it's not going to be that easy for them to shake their "white trash heaven" image that people have held in their minds for so long.
 

CKent

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
9,020
0
0
Judging by the people I see in there, anything even remotely upscale and/or more expensive might scare off a large chunk of their customer base.
 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,756
600
126
Originally posted by: alien42
isnt this like renovating a double wide?

LOL. That sums its up.

Walmarts thing is that its cheap. Thats it.

The walmart here is a fvcking nightmare to shop in. Horrible checkout lines, tight ailes that to many people can't fit in and at any given time 50% of the shelves seem to have needed restocking. I only shop there when I absolutely have too, and I only go when I'm going to buy lots of things. I don't go to walmart to pick up a toothbrush because I don't feel like spending 30 minutes buying a toothbrush.

So this is their strategy? Raise prices and try to sell trendier clothes. Maybe they should take a look at their image and then ask themselves if thats even possible. When I think of walmart I think of: Cheap garbage, welfare, trailer parks and horrible service. Now if I'm buying a bunch of cheap household goods, they often have what I need...but I'm not going to walmart to pick up the "latest fashions".

Why do they think the consumer is going to pay more money for what I consider to be the absolute worst shopping experience I have ever encountered? Their service is a joke, because they cut the bottom out of it. If they think upper middle class women driving BMWs are going to flock to them to buy expensive clothes because they throw a few fliers out there they're sh|tting themselves IMO.
 

Rogue

Banned
Jan 28, 2000
5,774
0
0
I guess Target is taking their market away slowly but surely. Now if Target and Costco would merge they could effectively "take out" Wal-Mart in the market place casuing them to collapse. The time is right for this to happen.
 

miri

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2003
3,679
0
76
Originally posted by: AnyMal
That said, it's also only a matter of time for the usual Wal-Mart clientelle to ruin whatever renovation Walm-Mart is going to undertake.

Lol
 

miri

Diamond Member
Jun 16, 2003
3,679
0
76
Originally posted by: Rogue
I guess Target is taking their market away slowly but surely. Now if Target and Costco would merge they could effectively "take out" Wal-Mart in the market place casuing them to collapse. The time is right for this to happen.

There is no way Target and Costco combined could challenge Walmart. Walmart has far to much money and way to many stores.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,138
18,685
146
Originally posted by: EatSpam
Same Chinese-made crap with a different face. Fvck Wal-mart.

Does Target and K-Mart really sell less stuff made in China? Really?