Walgreen's is based in IL (less than 30 minutes from Evanston). I think they are aware it gets cold here.
Yet those places don't have customer's opening the doors letting the warm or cool air out and being replaced by the extreme conditions on the other side. I'm somewhat optimistic that this will work, just not sure if it will be as efficient as Walgreens/designers estimate.
When all else fails post some asinine response.
We know this, but we are talking about engineers...the same people who make it nearly impossible to replace spark plugs without pulling an engine...
Maybe they have the double set of doors like a lot of big commercial places do so the room that needs to be heated up more often is much smaller.
It might be some sort of dual system, geothermal is used to regulate and a CO2 based heating/cooling system would take care of extremes.
At least that is what I got from reading the article.
3-17-2013
http://hothardware.com/News/Walgree...-with-Solar-Wind-and-Geothermal-Technologies/
Walgreens To Build First Self-Powered Retail Store with Solar, Wind, and Geothermal Technologies
The company announced plans for the first net zero energy retail store.
The store is slated to be built at the corner of Chicago Avenue and Keeney Street in Evanston, Illinois, where an existing Walgreens is currently being demolished. The technologies Walgreens is plotting to implement in this new super-green store will include solar panels and wind turbines to generate power; geothermal technology for heat; and efficient energy consumption with LED lighting, daylight harvesting, and ultra-high-efficiency refrigeration.
Whats truly impressive about this retail store is that it will actually generate more power than it consumes. Engineering estimates suggest that the location will produce 256,000 kilowatt hours per year while using just 200,000.
Yeah, what's the ROI?
The estimates are usually way off when they are trying to sell something.
The ROI will be being able to sustain our current level of development and technology for more than a few more generations.
Are you happy with that?
Last post for a bit, something that just popped into my head that is of interest....
I don't know where Evanstan is but I do know that Chicago is pretty much the worst place for solar due to their very low average "peak sun hours". The yearly average is pretty darn close to an average of 3 peak sun hours a day.
All it means is that someone else (taxpayers) are going to be paying the cost of their energy.