BladeVenom
Lifer
- Jun 2, 2005
- 13,365
- 16
- 0
Originally posted by: Mem
Latest benchmarks put Vista equal with XP,check firingSquad for more info on benchmarks.
It's closer than the last benchmarks I saw, but it's still not equal.
Originally posted by: Mem
Latest benchmarks put Vista equal with XP,check firingSquad for more info on benchmarks.
Originally posted by: BladeVenom
Originally posted by: Mem
Latest benchmarks put Vista equal with XP,check firingSquad for more info on benchmarks.
It's closer than the last benchmarks I saw, but it's still not equal.
.If you were debating between the 32-bit and 64-bit flavors of Windows Vista, fortunately it looks like performance is similar with either version. Both AMD and NVIDIA?s drivers for both versions of Vista perform practically identical to one another. And if you were concerned about game compatibility with 64-bit Vista, one of the guidelines Microsoft has required for Games For Windows certification is that games must be compatible with Windows Vista x64. This means if the game has a Games For Windows logo on the box, it?s been tested to run with 64-bit Windows Vista. Upcoming games like Alan Wake, Crysis, Fallout 3, Gears of War PC, and Hellgate: London are all Games For Windows compliant.
Considering all this, we?d recommend our readers opt for the 64-bit version of Vista if you?ve got a 64-bit CPU. It runs just as fast in games with the added advantage that it?s more secure and can address considerably more memory (4GB max in 32-bit Vista versus 128GB in 64-bit Vista Ultimate).
Originally posted by: Fistandantilis
OK so I am a bit confused, I only have 2g of RAM the rest of my rig is in my sig. I just got Vista 64 but I havent installed it yet thinking that 2g of RAM would be a crippling factor, I am a gamer so should I install the 64 bit flavor of vista or not?
Thanks