Vishera FX8350 - Overclock record

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sequoia464

Senior member
Feb 12, 2003
870
0
71
Yesnthat's stock OC it to the same 4.6Ghz then we will have a fair comparison.

I realized that after I posted; earlier in the thread the OP had his 8350 running @ 4600.

Initially I didn't notice that he had gone back to stock when he measured it.
 

Greenlepricon

Senior member
Aug 1, 2012
468
0
0
Greenlepricon: Since I own a Kill-O-meter I hooked it up to rig 3 below with the 8150 OC'd to 4.6Ghz (20 x 230 maula 1.425 vcore). I'm a cooling freak so I have the rig in a CM HAF 912 ( should have got the bigger case! I have a 200mm intake fan a side 120 mm intake fan, a 2700rpm 120 mm exhaust (panaflo) and I use a Corsair H100 at performance mode to cool the CPU. When running Intel Burn test(max stress on cpu) my rig less the monitor draws as much as 429watts - that all fans running max. At idle as I'm typing this its 146 watts. Bottomline? To get the 8150 to perform well you have to OC and use some power. I think the PileDriver will improve on that but to what degree is anyone's guess. From what has been leaked so far it will improve performance @7% to as high as 15%. I think based on the architecture limitations, 7% seems more likely. The real question will be power usuage. As they say " the jury is still out".

That's quite a bit. Just out of curiosity what do your Intel rigs draw? I want to overclock my 8120 past the 3.7GHz I'm getting on stock voltage, but I don't think my psu could handle it with my 7950 :( Anyway that's a side note. I've read that they advertise up to a 15% increase and hopefully that really is enough to close some gaps between them and Intel. Power isn't too big an issue for me as long as I can have the savings in the price difference from two products, but performance is really nice to have too.
 

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
12,038
5,013
136
Reminds me as well of IBM and their 250Ghz transistors. Just a shame again that its only a handful that can do it. And not 1-2 billion together.

Free PR to fool the unknowing.

The unknowning doesnt know that 100Ghz transistors are required
for processors working close to 5Ghz , as the higher clocked CPUs
from AMD/IBM/Intel...:biggrin: