VIDEO: Russian Missile Launch (Yikes!)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
R

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
Thank god they're selling those to the Iranians and Syria-we wouldn't want the RUSSIANS to use them on us ;)

You wankers

Rogo
 
Googer

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
THE RUSSIANS HAVE TESTED A MISSLE?! WE'RE DOOMED!

:D

Edit: And holy crap that scared the bajeezus out of me.
Click to expand...

They may fire first, but they will be the ones who are doomed.
 
Googer

Googer

Lifer
Nov 11, 2004
12,576
7
81
Originally posted by: lozina
pretty crappy audio quality but very cool nonetheless
Click to expand...

It still made my place rumble like when the space shuttle launches or flys over my place for a landing at Cape Kennedy.
 
9

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Thank god they're selling those to the Iranians and Syria-we wouldn't want the RUSSIANS to use them on us ;)

You wankers

Rogo
Click to expand...

They're not selling them to either of those countries.
 
Fritzo

Fritzo

Lifer
Jan 3, 2001
41,920
2,161
126
In Soviet Russia, the missle launches y.....oh.....alright, ENOUGH with that stupid joke! It's like twenty years old already!!!
 
R

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
Of the 73 carriers active only 62 are reported to be solid to NATO-Russia sold the other 9. Wiki is a joke if you're trying to make manifest any kind of primary source material lad.

Rogo
 
9

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Of the 73 carriers active only 62 are reported to be solid to NATO-Russia sold the other 9. Wiki is a joke if you're trying to make manifest any kind of primary source material lad.

Rogo
Click to expand...

If you're going to be an internet punkass, at least try to back up your statements. Show me a source, any source, that states that Russia has sold missiles to Iran or Syria.

So far, you've talked a lot but failed to back up your statements. I have a suspicion that you haven't simply because you can't.
 
R

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
If you're going to be an internet punkass, at least try to back up your statements. Show me a source, any source, that states that Russia has sold missiles to Iran or Syria.
Click to expand...

Back up your claim and I'll back up mine.

Wiki is not a source lad.

Rogo
 
9

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Rogodin2

Back up your claim and I'll back up mine.

Wiki is not a source lad.

Rogo
Click to expand...


Just as I suspected, you cannot back up your claim that Russia has sold the Topol-M to Iran and Syria.

Remember this:

Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Thank god they're selling those to the Iranians and Syria-we wouldn't want the RUSSIANS to use them on us ;)

You wankers

Rogo
Click to expand...

Where's your proof?
 
9

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
I'm still waiting for Rogodin 2 to back up his claims. He can't, so he has conveniently disappeared. I guess it's easier doing that than actually proving something that's false.
 
S

Suspicious-Teach8788

Lifer
Feb 19, 2001
20,155
23
81
Originally posted by: Indolent
Originally posted by: J0hnny
Originally posted by: OrganizedChaos
Originally posted by: J0hnny
Wow... cool. I wonder what a US mobile missile launcher looks like.
Click to expand...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_class_submarine
Click to expand...

I meant LANDBASED!
Click to expand...

What use would we get out of them? I'd think our subs would have the ability to hit anywhere in the world at any time.
Click to expand...


We don't ahve mobile land based carriers like those? I would've thought we would. Isn't the goal of a first strike capability to wipe out a nation's ability to strike back? SO that's why we have subs obviously, but I would've thought we would have mobile nukes too... must be tough though, if we did they must be manned with like 300 guards too when they need to be moved :)
 
R

Rogodin2

Banned
Jul 2, 2003
3,219
0
0
As discussed, Russian sources may have already provided an SS-25 to China and offered 45 Topol M ICBMs to Iran. If so, the taboo on transferring ICBMs may be weakening, establishing a precedent for exporting these systems. The recent reports of Russian SS-4 technology and components being transferred to Iran strengthens this fear.
Click to expand...

New York Times A45, P32, S23 Issue 112006, Ilan Trastantov.

Rogo
 
9

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
As discussed, Russian sources may have already provided an SS-25 to China and offered 45 Topol M ICBMs to Iran. If so, the taboo on transferring ICBMs may be weakening, establishing a precedent for exporting these systems. The recent reports of Russian SS-4 technology and components being transferred to Iran strengthens this fear.
Click to expand...

New York Times A45, P32, S23 Issue 112006, Ilan Trastantov.

Rogo
Click to expand...

Again, where is your proof?

That passage offers no indication that Russia has sold missiles to Iran. All it says is that they may have offered the missiles to Iran.

Surely they haven't sold them to Iran, because this would have been an immense news story given that Russia would have turned a non-nuclear nation into one which possesses one of the most advanced ICBMs overnight.

Again, where is the proof?
 
9

91TTZ

Lifer
Jan 31, 2005
14,374
1
0
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Anyone can quote from Wiki 9erz.

Night Night

Rogo
Click to expand...

Wow, it's so convenient to go to sleep when someone presses you to defend a point which cannot be defended.

I find it odd that you choose to stand your ground and put on a charade of an argument when in fact you have no case.

The list of nations that possess nuclear weapons is well known. With all the news stories about Iran trying to start a nuclear weapons program and develop a bomb and the US's efforts to prevent them from obtaining one, do you really think that we'd simply overlook the fact that they have a modern ICBM? Use some common sense, man.

You want sources? Try these:

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iran/nuke/index.html - where is the mention of those shiny new Topol-M missiles?

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/experience/the.bomb/deployment/ - I don't see anything listed for Iran, do you?

http://pro-resources.net/nuclear-weapon.html - It seems they left out the part about those missiles bought from Russia...

http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_12/Hunter.asp - Why write an article about that if they already have "the bomb"?


 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom