Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: Attackbollen
Hi,
Thinking about upgrading my rig with a new video card.
Current setup:
AMD 64 3000+
1024Mb+512Mb DDR 400
6800GT 256Mb
3 HDs
SB Audigy 2
Socket 754 AGP
PSU Antec TruePower 380W
One option I?m exploring is to get a cheap socket 754 pci express motherboard, pick up a faster video card, and wait a while with CPU + memory upgrade.
Thinking about getting an x1900xt 256 or 512Mb, or a 7959GT 256 or 512Mb. Any otehr card I should consider?
What do you guys think - would my current setup (CPU, Memory) bottleneck those cards much? To the extent it makes it a useless upgrade (compared to sticking with the 6800GT I have now)? I usually game at 1600x1200, preferably with details on high and some AA/AF.
And will my PSU be able to feed the x1900xt enough power? Or do I need to go with the 7950GT instead (for this reason)?
I know the x1900xt is a tad faster than the 7950GT. The question also is, will that even show any on my rig (if it?s already bottlenecked a bit by CPU/Mem)? And what about 256 or 512Mb (on my rig, will that make much difference)?
Many questions, I know, thankful for all the help you might be able to offer.
And I assume all hope is lost in regards to any of the newer and faster video cards being released on AGP?
Cheers,
Attackboll
same cpu/graphics card as one of my backup gaming pc's.
been kind of going back and forth on my options as well, and i decided on an dfi ultra-d and 256mb x1900xt - but i have a spare socket 939 cpu so i don't have that consideration, making my decision a bit easier...
your cpu really isn't much of a bottleneck, unlike someone else is saying... with current games, anything above 2.2-2.4 ghz a64 (or equivalent) the gpu is the bottleneck unless you're running very low resolution. there are mulitple articles you can refer to (don't have them off the top of my head) where they tested this and reached that conclusion - in other words, even if you have a C2D, you won't see much, if any improvement in gaming performance. desktop apps you will certainly notice substantail differences, but gaming, not really. if you can overclock your a64 to 2.3-2.4ghz or higher you should be fine for the time being.
if you decide you want to spend money on memory, motherboard, and cpu then i would certainly suggest going C2D as this may change in the future, but other than that i certainly would not worry about it for awhile.
edit: here's one example i found (and this one specifically applies to Oblivion):
"At the same time however, keep in mind that once you crank up the graphics settings in the game, you shift the load from your CPU to your graphics card ? once you?re running at 1280x1024 or 1600x1200 with HDR lighting, you?re probably not going to see much of a difference in performance regardless of what processor you have installed in your system. In our testing on the previous three pages you saw the Athlon 64 3500+ hanging with the latest and greatest AMD processors, the Athlon 64 FX-60, Athlon 64 X2 4800+, and Athlon 64 FX-57"
Article
here's
another from over at Xbit:
"Everything we said in our previous article called Contemporary CPUs and New Games: No Way to Delusions! was absolutely right. It is true: you don?t need a high-end processor for real gaming with realistic settings and high image quality. The gaming performance will still be limited by the graphics card. The recommended system requirements mentioned by all the game developers are absolutely correct. Do not be surprised that the game developers mention Pentium 4 3GHz+ and Athlon 64 2GHz+ processors as the minimum suitable CPUs for comfortable gameplay, even though today we can get 3.8GHz Intel CPUs and 2.8GHz AMD CPUs easily."