Video card benchmark program?

[JEDI]

Just wondering how slow these 2 are compared to current best bang budget cards.

THX

 

[manimal]

try 3dmark06 its free.

 

[heyheybooboo]

Originally posted by: JEDI
Just wondering how slow these 2 are compared to current best bang budget cards.

THX

Topic Summary: For Radeon 1250 (onboard)/Radeon 1550 64bit pcie

1250 = 690g
690g basicly being replaced next week by 780g (RS780)

3DMARK05 @690G=1105, @RS780=2495
Vista Experience Index @690G=3.1, @RS780=3.5

FEAR DEMO @690=15FPS, @RS780=29FPS

3DMARK 06 @690G : score=321, SM2:147, HDR/SM3=0, CPU score = 1860

3DMARK 06 @RS780: Score=1162, SM2:380, HDR/SM3=441, CPU score 1869

The 780g can be set to OC the onboard video. A score of 1492 3dmark06 was achieved at 900MHz (stock = 500MHz UMA+SIDEPORT)

There are 3 modes that the 780g can operate in. It can be in plain UMA mode, SIDEPORT mode or UMA+SIDEPORT. UMA+SIDEPORT enable gives the best performance for the integrated graphics.

If SIDEPORT is chosen, the GFX Clk speed can be chosen. The default is 400MHz.

If UMA+SIDEPORT is chosen, more options are available. You can also override the default 500MHz GFX core by raising it to a a maximum of 1023MHz.

UMA Frame buffer size can be set to Auto, 32, 64, 128, 256 or 512MB.

GFX Engine Clk is default at 500MHz, it can be upped to 1023MHz. To run at higher GFX CLK, it is better to raise the NB voltage.

From: OC Workbench

The X1550 scores I found on the ORB ranged form 1195 to 2040 in 3dmark06 with the average around 1430. The CPUs ranged from a Athlon 64 3200+ to a Intel Core 2 Duo X6800.

Edit: I just bought a hd2900pro for $145 and got 9152 3dmark06 with an X2 5400+ at stock 2.8GHz