Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: Don_Vito
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
That's nice - and that is supposed to make his comments "OK"?
CkG
No, it's just an observation I find interesting. Which comments in particular are you offended by? Link?
No, I wasn't "offended" by what he said. I just think it was wrong of him to say. I'm embarrassed at times by politicians like him but I'm not "offended". Those who are "offended" are usually the ones with the issues - not the person that was supposedly "offensive". People's sensitivities are worn on thier shirt sleeves and easily manipulated by others.
kennedy's "moral equivilancy" bleatings from yesterday- "On March 19th, 2004, President Bush asked, who would prefer that Saddam's torture chambers still be open? Shamefully we now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new management, U.S. management."
Is he really trying to equate what Saddam did to this current issue? Is he really that desperate to blame Bush? Again - i'm not "offended" - just embarrassed that he would suggest that we are no better than Saddam.
Anyway my comments were in response to conjur's post about Senators who made embarassing remarks but this tripe from Swimmer is about the torture issue not about the beheading of Nick Burg.
CkG