• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Video : 15 Year old pepper sprayed after biting cop

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Narmer
Simple question: If she broke free and ran away, is he justified in shooting her?

I have no idea where you're going with this, but no, of course he can't shoot her.

The police can only shoot a fleeing felon who poses a risk of death or serious injury to the officers or others.
 
Originally posted by: Venix
Originally posted by: ProfJohn
Originally posted by: Aimster
Why was she being arrested
She was out alone at 1:50 AM and was breaking curfew.

Don?t have any detail as to whether everyone who breaks curfew is arrested or if she did something on top of that to warrant being arrested.

It is fucking disgraceful that children today are arrested and jailed for "crimes" like staying out late or bringing a water gun to school. I hope there was some other factor leading to the arrest.

In any case, this is what happens when police are trained only to escalate the level of violence until they have total control of a situation. I've done work with troubled kids, and have found much better ways of ensuring compliance than screaming at them and using force. And most of these kids weren't frail, 15-year-old crying girls.

The girl should obviously be punished for biting the officer, but incidents like this would happen far less if police training provided for something other than escalation of force and hostility to gain compliance.


It is frequently the case where cops will pick up the child and give them a ride home; especially females. THis accomplishes a few things:
It verifies the identity of th ekid, because they often don't have or don't supply adequate ID
It gives the cop a chance to remind the parents about the curfew
It ensures that the minor child gets home safely.

In some cases with repeat offenders, I believe it's common to take the kid to the cop shop and call the parents to come and get them, regardless of the hour ( to help inspire the parent to keep track of their "little treasure / spoiled POS brat twerp demon seed ignorant spoiled lying offspring)

It is also likely that the Cop only decided to cuff her because she was unruley and she escalated the situation to "problem" level.

I would also bet that backup & supervisor were called, but first, the situation has to be controlled.

In some cases, the parents think the kid is somewhere else (like "Staying over at Suzie's house").

If I had to speculate (I don't, but I will), I see it as happening something like this:

(Cop sees girl walking down the street)
COP: "Miss may I see some ID"
Kid: "F*ck off pig, I'm on my way home..."
(situation degrades to kid biting the Cop with her filthy germ & disease-ridden mouth)

At this point, I'm all for the cop beating the snot out of the kid. Welts & bruises are certainly justified; Mace, CS, CN , and / or Pepper spray is permitted. Tasing is out, it doesn't hurt enough, but, maybe one of the cattle prod-style shockers would be be OK, if they could find some clear flesh to contact.

The Cop was doing his job. If the girl turned up missing / dead / raped / beaten and it was found that he *could have* stopped her (and helped her and given her a ride) and didn't, with a curfew law on the books (typically enforced or not), then the Cop would have been at fault, probably would have lost his job, and one or several lawyers get richer.

For the "an adult Cop should be able to control a 15 year old girl" crowd ... Yes it true, and I'm sure the Cop could easily subdue a 15 year old girl. The problem is to start with a minimum of force and work up from there. It give the perp more than one chance to back down before additional force is brought to bear. His attempt to be gentle got him bit.

He could easily have smacked her up aside the head with a five D-cell flashlight and dropped her in her tracks, but it's obvious from the video that her was trying hard to give her the benefit of the doubt and a chance to back down.

Here's a couple for the Cops. They deserve much better than the public they serve is usually willing to give: :beer::beer::beer:

As for "getting arrested" for water pistols & such, that's a totally different issue (unless, of course the toy gun is failrly real looking and the kid is stupid enough to point it at someone, like a cop, in a stress situation ... that's just Charles Darwin calling him home).
 
Then again, she may have only refused to perform the sexually oral performance demanded by the cop? SOP? Sure! Just ask JD50.
 
Originally posted by: Venix
Originally posted by: Narmer
Simple question: If she broke free and ran away, is he justified in shooting her?

I have no idea where you're going with this, but no, of course he can't shoot her.

The police can only shoot a fleeing felon who poses a risk of death or serious injury to the officers or others.[/q]


:laugh:😀 LOL.
 
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Then again, she may have only refused to perform the sexually oral performance demanded by the cop? SOP? Sure! Just ask JD50.

What is that supposed to mean?

Oh, nvm, I get it, just because it got you out of a ticket you think that it would work for everyone.
 
the problem here is the media only showed the few seconds of the clip that made the officer appear to be in the wrong instead of the full video which shows the reality of the situation.
 
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon
Originally posted by: PC Surgeon


Ya know, I've been as polite and understanding as I possibly can be with you, but this is the kind of shit that just pisses me off. You completely ommited every bad thing that that girl did just to make the cop look bad. :cookie:

She resisted arrest and bit the cop. I guess every child deserves to be right hooked in the face for that :roll:

EDIT: Make the cop "look bad". I'm sorry, IMO it was bad.

I meant to edit but instead quoted 🙁[/quote]

Maybe she deserves a night stick to the ribs instead? That was a reaction to her bite, not a police trained reaction. That was hardly a punch that would hurt anyone either.
 
This is all about the parents of the 15 yr old letting their children run around at night. It is about parents not being responsible. So where were the parents?
 
Reasonable is the key description of force here. The court would argue about what is reasonable force. After biting she should be hogtied like an animal. There are harnesses that can secure both arms in place. If he put a bit in her mouth or put a gag on her he would be justified. Remember that often people with Aids try to bite and spit on people.
 
Originally posted by: piasabird
Reasonable is the key description of force here. The court would argue about what is reasonable force. After biting she should be hogtied like an animal. There are harnesses that can secure both arms in place. If he put a bit in her mouth or put a gag on her he would be justified. Remember that often people with Aids try to bite and spit on people.

Because the chances of transmitting AIDS through saliva are so high...where have you been for the last 20 years?
 
Rightly or wrongly, I won't be surprised if she gets a nice legal settlement. Also, now that the police have released the video and it's been broadcast all over the Internet, considering that she's a minor, she might be able to get some compensation for an invasion of her privacy (again, rightly or wrongly).

I won't be surprised if, at trial (civil or criminal) she says that she was afraid she would be taken to a secluded area and gang-raped by the police and that that is the reason she resisted so heavily.
 
Your friend isa police officer in lame county and I showed him this video.

His comment?

"Damn lucky that the videocamera was on him, that officer was a vampire."



Rogo
 
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: piasabird
Reasonable is the key description of force here. The court would argue about what is reasonable force. After biting she should be hogtied like an animal. There are harnesses that can secure both arms in place. If he put a bit in her mouth or put a gag on her he would be justified. Remember that often people with Aids try to bite and spit on people.

Because the chances of transmitting AIDS through saliva are so high...where have you been for the last 20 years?

You want to take that chance???
 
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Then again, she may have only refused to perform the sexually oral performance demanded by the cop? SOP? Sure! Just ask JD50.

What is that supposed to mean?

Oh, nvm, I get it, just because it got you out of a ticket you think that it would work for everyone.

There are bad cops and good cops, but not many old good cops. Most quit 'cause they cannot stomach their fellow officers. You get it? Don't think so.
 
She deserved all of that. If she really did nothing wrong, then why wouldn't she just comply with the orders? Everything would get cleared up if you're innocent?

The last thing you want to do when dealing with the law is to strike, hit, bite, smack, or otherwise assault an officer. You do that, and you deserve all the trouble coming to you.

What, did she think that by biting him he would magically say "Ok, it's all good now, you can go home"? :roll:
 
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Originally posted by: JD50
Originally posted by: WHAMPOM
Then again, she may have only refused to perform the sexually oral performance demanded by the cop? SOP? Sure! Just ask JD50.

What is that supposed to mean?

Oh, nvm, I get it, just because it got you out of a ticket you think that it would work for everyone.

There are bad cops and good cops, but not many old good cops. Most quit 'cause they cannot stomach their fellow officers. You get it? Don't think so.

And what do you have to back up your ASSumption?
 
1) She was breaking curfew, and unless someone can show that the officer was wrong if arresting her, he was right

2) She was indeed resisting arrest. The officer used considerable restraint. I see "right hook, right hook" being used as a reason to punish the officer. I grew up in inner city Philly, was jumped by an officer because of mistaken identity and got "a right hook" among other things. I was left lying blooded and unable to move. He didn't "right hook" her so much as tap her to get her attention. Forget any other situation about gang members. That's specious. He had her confined and needed to control the situation. He could have taken her off camera, acted as if she broke away and pummeled her. If anyone thinks it's equivalent, I can say from personal knowledge that it's not.

3) Can you imagine the result if he just peppered her earlier? "He was a beast. He should have given her more of a chance", yadda yadda yadda. He had to balance giving her a chance to comply with going on to the next level of force. He did a damn fine job. He could have pounded her into oblivion if that was his intent. He was taking great pains to make sure she wasn't permanently damaged.

3) What the hell was she doing out anyway? She needed to be arrested, her parents called in to get her and THEY do a couple nights in the pokey. She's a minor and their responsibility.

4) I wish this guy worked in my neighborhood. If I was to lose possession of senses and let my daughter out after she ought to have been, I'd feel comfortable that he would have used the proper measures to arrest her, as evidenced by his keeping her in sight of the camera. Further, I wouldn't blame him if I did a couple nights in the county jail for my letting her loose. That would have been my fault.

 
I can't watch the video, as I am at work...but what I'm gleaning is that she bit the cop, resisted arrest and attempted to punch him?

I don't think he should punch her back, but she needed to be pepper-sprayed for sure. Maybe it's because I've never really been in trouble with the police, but I've always assumed that compliance is the easiest way to (a) not get maced and (b) be able to fight any bad-charges using the legal system. The minute you attack a cop, your case goes out the window.
 
Originally posted by: Rogodin2
Your friend isa police officer in lame county and I showed him this video.

His comment?

"Damn lucky that the videocamera was on him, that officer was a vampire."



Rogo

????
 
Originally posted by: teclis1023
I can't watch the video, as I am at work...but what I'm gleaning is that she bit the cop, resisted arrest and attempted to punch him?

I don't think he should punch her back, but she needed to be pepper-sprayed for sure. Maybe it's because I've never really been in trouble with the police, but I've always assumed that compliance is the easiest way to (a) not get maced and (b) be able to fight any bad-charges using the legal system. The minute you attack a cop, your case goes out the window.

Some have said he punched her. I'm not sure because of the angle he may have brushed or even missed her entirely. Physically, she hardly responded at all.
 
Back
Top