• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Vid of cop losing it when told he'll need a warrant to search car

was that real or fake? i cant even tell real from fake videos in youtube anymore. everybody trying to have fame and do acting pretending to be real jus for millions of views and get to be a guest in talk shows and in tv. later on it was revealed... they actors.


is this video real? if it is then lucky the crazy cop dont use power to abuse pulling up his stick or even worse his gun. always act like a suck up if see cop crazy like that. they the one who have weapon and we dont. they can be crazy and use weapon on us.
 
Cops do not need a warrent to search a car, or even a person once pulled over for a traffic violation.
 
NiceCold said:
do school security need a warrent to search students bagpack?
Click to expand...

Every school security I have seen are also police officers, if they have a reason to suspect you of a crime, I do not see why a warrent is needed.

It probably should be some type of reasonable suspicion though before they can go searching.
 
Last edited:
DCal430 said:
Cops do not need a warrent to search a car, or even a person once pulled over for a traffic violation.
Click to expand...

Yes they do. There are some exceptions (mainly being if you give consent, or if you and/or a passenger are arrested). They can't just pull you over for a busted light and tear through your shit.
 
DCal430 said:
Cops do not need a warrent to search a car, or even a person once pulled over for a traffic violation.
Click to expand...

A warrant, or probable cause. One of those is needed, or your state appointed attorney will have all the evidence tossed out. If you do not consent, and no warrant is issued, then it's not a legal search.
 
DCal430 said:
Every school security I have seen are also police officers, if they have a reason to suspect you of a crime, I do not see why a warrent is needed.

It probably should be some type of reasonable suspicion though before they can go searching.
Click to expand...

14,15 years ago i got in a fight in school. school security (not school police) search my bag and i was like wtf how is that relevant to the fight? but i didnt say anything. luckly my porn magazine wasnt in there.
 
There was a big court case here a while back, a guy was pulled over on bicycle for a minor traffic violation. The cop searched him and his bike and found marijuana hidden in his bicycle. It was not visible, the police took his bicycle apart to search. He did not consent to a search. The state supreme court ruled that being pulled over for a traffic violation was enough probable cause for search of a suspect and his bicycle.
 
Alone said:
Yes they do. There are some exceptions (mainly being if you give consent, or if you and/or a passenger are arrested). They can't just pull you over for a busted light and tear through your shit.
Click to expand...

The courts here in California have ruled otherwise. A minor traffic violation is all that is needed for a search.
 
DCal430 said:
There was a big court case here a while back, a guy was pulled over on bicycle for a minor traffic violation. The cop searched him and his bike and found marijuana hidden in his bicycle. It was not visible, the police took his bicycle apart to search. He did not consent to a search. The state supreme court ruled that being pulled over for a traffic violation was enough probable cause for search of a suspect and his bicycle.
Click to expand...
http://legal-ease.blogs.heraldtribune.com/10678/officer-illegally-searches-boy-on-bicycle/
You mean that case where the search WASN'T determined to be legal?
 
Alone said:
http://legal-ease.blogs.heraldtribune.com/10678/officer-illegally-searches-boy-on-bicycle/
You mean that case where the search WASN'T determined to be legal?
Click to expand...

No this was a different cases a few years back. I left one part out the case, the suspect didn't have ID. Failure to have ID while committing a code violation is an arrestable offence under California State Law. It could be as simple as jay walking to running a red light. Not having ID when being ticketed for these offenses could get you arrested. They used this to justify the search.
 
DCal430 said:
No this was a different cases a few years back. I left one part out the case, the suspect didn't have ID. Failure to have ID while committing a code violation is an arrestable offence under California State Law. It could be as simple as jay walking to running a red light. Not having ID when being ticketed for these offenses could get you arrested. They used this to justify the search.
Click to expand...

That's different. I told you they can search your vehicle if you're arrested. You left out a pretty critical piece of information.
 
DCal430 said:
There was a big court case here a while back, a guy was pulled over on bicycle for a minor traffic violation. The cop searched him and his bike and found marijuana hidden in his bicycle. It was not visible, the police took his bicycle apart to search. He did not consent to a search. The state supreme court ruled that being pulled over for a traffic violation was enough probable cause for search of a suspect and his bicycle.
Click to expand...
You say they don't need a warrant to search a car (which is untrue) then use a bicycle as an example. Were you dropped on your head as a child? 😱
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top