Indus
Lifer
- May 11, 2002
- 15,944
- 11,103
- 136
What exactly was he trying to say?
This apparently.. according to you.
What exactly was he trying to say?
This apparently.. according to you.
Yeah, I never had the idea that Vance was winning. Walz looked challenged and nervous but not overwhelmed. Vance was glib and serene to a fault, but the things he said were rhetorical prevarication. I had to smile and occasionally laugh when listening to him. Smarmy, overconfident, ungrounded, even pompous. How many times did he bring up the "vision" of his "3 beautiful children?"Kind of sad that people think vance "won" the debate just because he lied a lot more smoothly and didn't flip out like trump did. Do people just not actually care about what is actually being said (rhetorical question)?
It’s more about being a critical thinker than anything and having an open mind that your feelings may not be backed up by facts and understanding that if you are wrong it’s ok to change your mind or reevaluate your position. It’s human nature to double down on your wrongness so it takes a lot of work to be open to being wrong. If new information is presented to me and it sounds good or aligns with my feels, I immediately fact check it. If something sounds wrong and doesn’t align with my feels, I immediately fact check it. The critical thinking part comes in when evaluating sources, context, and understanding what is being said and not being said (or omitted) and it’s realizing the my own biases might be clouding how I’m interpreting something.
Simply getting your information from multiple sources isn’t enough. Especially when you have journalism that seems hell bent on not coming off as biased as opposed to just reporting the facts, even if it appears to look like biased reporting.
Seems as though a nerve was touched.
Probably right
But trump has said some really awful things but I have never recalled you questioning him on it
At the same time you constantly defend trump and call others out for taking things out of context..
So prove us wrong and find a post that you posted that was as critical to walz that trump said
I will not hold my breath
Probably right
But trump has said some really awful things but I have never recalled you questioning him on it
At the same time you constantly defend trump and call others out for taking things out of context..
So prove us wrong and find a post that you posted that was as critical to walz that trump said
I will not hold my breath
I only asked why he said he was friends with school shooters.
What was he trying to say?
Everyone is saying it is clear he "misspoke", but what was he trying to say.
You tell me.
I only asked why he said he was friends with school shooters.
What was he trying to say?
Everyone is saying it is clear he "misspoke", but what was he trying to say.
You tell me.
So nobody knows what he was trying to say.
Got it.
Thank you, I was about to post this as well. Like, it's not fucking difficult @pcgeek11
So I just responded
What did Trump mean when he made the comment the fallen soldiers are suckers and losers..
Since you're vapid and intellectually lazy: in a follow-up discussion he talked about how he befriended David Hogg and others from Parkland and Sandy Hook. It took me approximately seven seconds to do an internet search to find a video of this, and the clip was 48 seconds long.I only asked why he said he was friends with school shooters.
What was he trying to say?
Everyone is saying it is clear he "misspoke", but what was he trying to say.
You tell me.
You could also, you know, thank him for answering the question you cared so much about finding an answer for that you asked/posted about it *checks notes* 4 times.I have no idea...
Yes, nobody can really know for sure what somebody really means when they say things. You can't even be sure you aren't living inside a hologram and everything you say has actually been programmed. What could certainty possibly mean when one apparently is some sort of biological organism that navigates life sort of by chemical signals sent from the environment that are certainly not the environment itself up a neurons to a central processing machine that turns them into internal representations of external stimuli but only of a bandwidth suitable to the spectrum you can receive.I have no idea...