• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

vet makes mistake

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
You're trolling is so bad it's actually making me angry. Which maybe makes you the master troll. Because a real troll has never pissed me off, but right now I'm furious.

"dawg" set me off. Coffee is all over my desk and pants because I pounded my desk in anger.

Fuck you, and your horrible trolling. You suck at it.

My desk is covered in coffee as well...thank you for the laugh :biggrin:

OP has been trying too hard lately.
 
did you read and watch the video? if so you are fucking stupid.


they took it to the first vet who said it had some major health problems and needed to be put down. they gave permission to the vet.

vet keeps animal for some reason (resale? to keep?)

family finds out and gets dog back. takes dog to 2nd vet for evaluation that vet said there was nothing wrong with dog. family and dog happy.

OP is a tool and a idiot.

The vet kept the dog so he could use it as a living blood bank.
 
Something is weird about the story. Did they find pouches of blood that belonged to the dog which is how they know it was used as a blood bank?
 
The vet kept the dog so he could use it as a living blood bank.

yeah, said the fired tattoed former employee. that makes it sound like bear bile draining or something, i doubt it was like that

Again - from your own source - the evidence that the investigators found in the clinic was consistent with the story that the dog owner told about the dog being kept for use as a blood donor for other dogs.
 
Something is weird about the story. Did they find pouches of blood that belonged to the dog which is how they know it was used as a blood bank?

They could have found a schedule of when the dog had and was going to have blood withdrawn or some other forms of documentation.
 
Again - from your own source - the evidence that the investigators found in the clinic was consistent with the story that the dog owner told about the dog being kept for use as a blood donor for other dogs.

even if so why is donating blood abuse?

There comes a point when 99.99% of posters would recognize blatant trolling. It was about 3 of the OP's posts before this one. -Admin DrPizza
 
Last edited by a moderator:
did you read and watch the video? if so you are fucking stupid.
You need to remember this Oblama dude post this crap just because he is has a bus load of mental issues......he doesn`t care about read or watching or even accuracy....
 
This thread is a good example of why AT forums might benefit from a reputation system. Some folks like me have a hard time remembering who the loons are around here. I might have to start keeping a list. I could just put people like the OP on ignore, but then I'd miss all the funny and self-ownage.
 
Now you're either trolling or just stupid 🙂

Now?

This thread is a good example of why AT forums might benefit from a reputation system. Some folks like me have a hard time remembering who the loons are around here. I might have to start keeping a list. I could just put people like the OP on ignore, but then I'd miss all the funny and self-ownage.

I think what would work better is an upvote/downvote system for threads.
 
these people tell the oblama they want their thread killed, and the oblama just keeps the apparently ok thread, whats wrong with that. the people then find out, and get the thread back, and take it to be killed by another oblama who tells them the thread is ok. what did the first oblama do wrong, the owners didnt want the thread and tried to kill it, and he saved it

fixed
 
the vet appears to have a good reputation and this was reported by a disgruntled, tattooed former employee, im not sure id believe the claims about it being kept in a cage as a blood bank just yet. also who the heck kills a 4 year old dawg

TATTOOED? That monster! That's much worse than stealing a family pet to harvest its blood.
 
the vet appears to have a good reputation and this was reported by a disgruntled, tattooed former employee, im not sure id believe the claims about it being kept in a cage as a blood bank just yet. also who the heck kills a 4 year old dawg

I missed this one. I burst out laughing. I wonder how many tattooed folks got their jimmies rustled.
 
Just to bump this thread. The vet went before the licensing board in an attempt to get his license reinstated

He more or less admitted to everything he was accused of(and admitted to things that he hadnt yet been accused of). Blamed it on his hoarding tendencies. It doesn't appear likely he will get his license back. Criminal charges aren't likely to be dropped either.
 
Back
Top