• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

vet makes mistake

OBLAMA2009

OBLAMA2009

Diamond Member
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/04/29/dog-kept-alive-months-after-supposed-euthanization/

these people tell the vet they want their dog killed, and the vet just keeps the apparently ok dog, whats wrong with that. the people then find out, and get the dog back, and take it to be killed by another vet who tells them the dog is ok. what did the first vet do wrong, the owners didnt want the dog and tried to kill it, and he saved it Troll bait title amended from "dog owners are mad vet didnt euthanize their dog" to current, accurate title. -Admin DrPizza
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OBLAMA2009 said:
i dont get it whats wrong with that you guys
Click to expand...
First off, they didn't take it to the second vet to get it killed. They took it for an evaluation.
Second, since they were at the first vet, and then decided (based on health issues) to euthanize the animal, it was undoubtedly because of the advice of the shitty vet.

EDIT: Watch the video. They confirmed that the shitty vet recommended the euthanasia. The family is happy that the dog is now home and healthy.
 
Last edited:
Wingznut said:
First off, they didn't take it to the second vet to get it killed. They took it for an evaluation.
Second, since they were at the first vet, and then decided (based on health issues) to euthanize the animal, it was undoubtedly because of the advice of the shitty vet.
Click to expand...

a lot of people go to vets though and "convince" themselves that their dog should be put to sleep cuz they dont want to take care of it anymore, e.g. their dog has a little arthritis, ok lets do the humane thing and euthanize it
 
OBLAMA2009 said:
a lot of people go to vets though and "convince" themselves that their dog should be put to sleep cuz they dont want to take care of it anymore, e.g. their dog has a little arthritis, ok lets do the humane thing and euthanize it
Click to expand...
Cool story... Unfortunately, not relevant to THIS story.
 
OBLAMA2009 said:
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/04/29/dog-kept-alive-months-after-supposed-euthanization/

these people tell the vet they want their dog killed, and the vet just keeps the apparently ok dog, whats wrong with that. the people then find out, and get the dog back, and take it to be killed by another vet who tells them the dog is ok. what did the first vet do wrong, the owners didnt want the dog and tried to kill it, and he saved it
Click to expand...

did you read and watch the video? if so you are fucking stupid.


they took it to the first vet who said it had some major health problems and needed to be put down. they gave permission to the vet.

vet keeps animal for some reason (resale? to keep?)

family finds out and gets dog back. takes dog to 2nd vet for evaluation that vet said there was nothing wrong with dog. family and dog happy.

OP is a tool and a idiot.
 
OBLAMA2009 said:
a lot of people go to vets though and "convince" themselves that their dog should be put to sleep cuz they dont want to take care of it anymore, e.g. their dog has a little arthritis, ok lets do the humane thing and euthanize it
Click to expand...

Is your avatar actually you? Because you seem to have the mental capacity of somebody who might look that way.
 
OBLAMA2009 said:
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2014/04/29/dog-kept-alive-months-after-supposed-euthanization/

these people tell the vet they want their dog killed, and the vet just keeps the apparently ok dog, whats wrong with that. the people then find out, and get the dog back, and take it to be killed by another vet who tells them the dog is ok. what did the first vet do wrong, the owners didnt want the dog and tried to kill it, and he saved it
Click to expand...

Did you read/view the article/video at your own link?

"these people tell the vet they want their dog killed"
No. According to the video the vet recommended euthanasia to the family.

''the vet just keeps the apparently ok dog, whats wrong with that."
Well,just maybe, if the family agrees with the recommendation to put the dog down and he doesn't do it but keeps the dog alive in a cage, IN A CAGE, for 6 months in order to provide blood for other dogs (from your video), that could all certainly qualify as "wrong."

"the owners didnt want the dog and tried to kill it"
Really? Where does anything say that?

"and he saved it"
If you call putting the dog in a cage for 6 months and using it to provide blood for other dogs (again from your video) 'saving' it.

"i dont get it whats wrong with that you guys"
🙄🙄🙄
 
the vet appears to have a good reputation and this was reported by a disgruntled, tattooed former employee, im not sure id believe the claims about it being kept in a cage as a blood bank just yet. also who the heck kills a 4 year old dawg
 
OBLAMA2009 said:
the vet appears to have a good reputation and this was reported by a disgruntled, tattooed former employee, im not sure id believe the claims about it being kept in a cage as a blood bank just yet. also who the heck kills a 4 year old dawg
Click to expand...

well considering the family FOUND the dog ALIVE is pretty damn good proof. Who kills a 4 year old dog? someone who trust the vet when they recommend that.
 
lying to the family, thats not good but its a minor thing, but all this talk about this being a major crime (not killing a dawg) and arresting the vet is ridiculous
 
allisolm said:
Did you read/view the article/video at your own link?

"these people tell the vet they want their dog killed"
No. According to the video the vet recommended euthanasia to the family.

''the vet just keeps the apparently ok dog, whats wrong with that."
Well,just maybe, if the family agrees with the recommendation to put the dog down and he doesn't do it but keeps the dog alive in a cage, IN A CAGE, for 6 months in order to provide blood for other dogs (from your video), that could all certainly qualify as "wrong."

"the owners didnt want the dog and tried to kill it"
Really? Where does anything say that?

"and he saved it"
If you call putting the dog in a cage for 6 months and using it to provide blood for other dogs (again from your video) 'saving' it.

"i dont get it whats wrong with that you guys"
🙄🙄🙄
Click to expand...

we dont know that the vet recommended euthanasia. a lot of people cant/dont want to pay for vet care and a vet suggests euthanasia as an alternative to not getting treatment, but that isnt the vet recommending you put your dog to sleep. im sure theres more to this story
 
OBLAMA2009 said:
lying to the family, thats not good but its a minor thing, but all this talk about this being a major crime (not killing a dawg) and arresting the vet is ridiculous
Click to expand...

You're trolling is so bad it's actually making me angry. Which maybe makes you the master troll. Because a real troll has never pissed me off, but right now I'm furious.

"dawg" set me off. Coffee is all over my desk and pants because I pounded my desk in anger.

Fuck you, and your horrible trolling. You suck at it.
 
Capt Caveman said:
OP has to be trolling b/c a person with half a brain would have been able to comprehend the news story in the link.
Click to expand...

The OP is a lifelong troll... every post is a labored character trying to sound like his avatar looks (and that's the best case scenario)

Not sure how you guys haven't started ignoring him yet
 
gorcorps said:
The OP is a lifelong troll... every post is a labored character trying to sound like his avatar looks (and that's the best case scenario)

Not sure how you guys haven't started ignoring him yet
Click to expand...

or why he ain't banned yet. all eh ever does is troll.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top