And Democrats were crying over fighting ISIS "it's what they want!"
Does this slaughter look like it benefits them?
Link?
Or is this just more false attribution towards a group you
need to see as one homogeneous entity?
Knowing many registered Dems who consider me a conservative, I can't say I've heard any of them ever disapprove of killing bloodthirsty fundies on the battlefield. Quite the opposite actually, and we're in agreement.
Your question sounds a little like intentional misrepresentation of talk regarding policy
strategy with the talk of regional
tactics. I hope I'm wrong, that you can appreciate the approval for applying 70mm rockets to terrorists and a distaste for counterproductive strategy are not mutually exclusive.
Might be a good time to mention that it wasn't a Democrat project that led to the creation of ISIL. Show me a Dem who speaks for them all and who espouses what you say, and I'll show you someone you can ignore on military tactics. Foolish nation building for spurious reasons that creates genocide laden terror is another topic entirely.
Facebook
Twitter