• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Vermont Democrats call for Bush impeachment

bamacre

Lifer
linky

RANDOLPH, Vermont (Reuters) - Democratic Party leaders in Vermont on Saturday passed a motion asking Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against
President Bush.

In an elementary school cafeteria strewn with American flags and copies of the U.S. Constitution, some 100 state party officials agreed to make the request to the U.S. House of Representatives.

"You know in your own hearts and minds that something is terribly wrong in this country," said Margaret Lucenti, a Democrat from Vermont's capital Montpelier.

The measure asks the Republican-controlled House to pass articles of impeachment against Bush for misleading the nation on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and engaging in illegal wiretapping, among other charges.

Democratic state committees in Wisconsin, New Mexico, Nevada and North Carolina have taken similar steps.

With a population of just 621,000 -- only Wyoming has fewer people -- the rural New England state is considered far left of mainstream American politics.

Last month residents of the Puritan-founded town of Newfane passed a resolution calling for the Republican president's impeachment. Since then at least six other Vermont towns have followed suit.

In 1999, more than two dozen towns called for a reduction in nuclear weapons. In 1974, one Vermont town meeting drew national attention when officials voted to seek the impeachment of then-President Richard Nixon.

"This is far bigger than a fringe movement on the left," said Dan DeWalt, a 49-year-old woodworker who drafted the Newfane impeachment resolution. "Vermont has a long tradition of speaking out on issues beyond our borders."

Too little, too late? The Democrats just don't have the numbers in Congress to do anything, much less impeach Bush.

But what if the Democrats take control of both the House and the Senate after 2006 elections? Do you think impeachment will be in order? If so, what legality will they get him on? They'll need a massive Bic razor to get rid of this Bush.
 
These resolutions mean nothing really. They are about as usefull as calling for the president's impeachment here in the forums.
 
Whatever Bush did, I don't care. As long as he get didn't get his knob slobbed on, it's all good right guys?

Right?

Right guys?

Right?

Oh wait...

EDIT: didn't LOL, damn it's late
 
Originally posted by: Donny Baker
Whatever Bush did, I don't care. As long as he get knob slobbed on, it's all good right guys?

Right?

Right guys?

Right?

Oh wait...



Huh?

It would be nice if the only thing he deserved to be impeached for is because he liked pussy... mr bush just likes killing... he is a true sociopath...

Ask those 30,000+ dead Iraqi Civilians if mr bush should be impeached

What will your family do 40 years from now when the truth comes about concerning Cheney and bush and 9/11 and Iraq... etc et al.

 
Originally posted by: bamacre
linky

RANDOLPH, Vermont (Reuters) - Democratic Party leaders in Vermont on Saturday passed a motion asking Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against
President Bush.

In an elementary school cafeteria strewn with American flags and copies of the U.S. Constitution, some 100 state party officials agreed to make the request to the U.S. House of Representatives.

"You know in your own hearts and minds that something is terribly wrong in this country," said Margaret Lucenti, a Democrat from Vermont's capital Montpelier.

The measure asks the Republican-controlled House to pass articles of impeachment against Bush for misleading the nation on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and engaging in illegal wiretapping, among other charges.

Democratic state committees in Wisconsin, New Mexico, Nevada and North Carolina have taken similar steps.

With a population of just 621,000 -- only Wyoming has fewer people -- the rural New England state is considered far left of mainstream American politics.

Last month residents of the Puritan-founded town of Newfane passed a resolution calling for the Republican president's impeachment. Since then at least six other Vermont towns have followed suit.

In 1999, more than two dozen towns called for a reduction in nuclear weapons. In 1974, one Vermont town meeting drew national attention when officials voted to seek the impeachment of then-President Richard Nixon.

"This is far bigger than a fringe movement on the left," said Dan DeWalt, a 49-year-old woodworker who drafted the Newfane impeachment resolution. "Vermont has a long tradition of speaking out on issues beyond our borders."

Too little, too late? The Democrats just don't have the numbers in Congress to do anything, much less impeach Bush.

But what if the Democrats take control of both the House and the Senate after 2006 elections? Do you think impeachment will be in order? If so, what legality will they get him on? They'll need a massive Bic razor to get rid of this Bush.

I sure hope it happens, for the sake of our nation. Otherwise we face certain doom. Anyone who tries to deny that Bush has placed us in a seriously weakened position in every way is deluded IMO. He has broken countless laws and spat on the Constitution. He should be impeached.
 
While it COULD happen next year if the Democrats take Congress it is far more likely that Democrats would rather have Bush in office during the next Presidential campaign.
After all, all you will need is a poster of Bush and the words Vote Democrat on it and you will win.
 
Democratic Party leaders in Vermont on Saturday passed a motion asking Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against President Bush.

YES! AT LEAST SOMEBODY GETS IT!

Followed by criminal proceedings for this entire corrupt administration.
 
Good luck with that guys, it aint gonna happen.

Originally posted by: techs
While it COULD happen next year if the Democrats take Congress it is far more likely that Democrats would rather have Bush in office during the next Presidential campaign.
After all, all you will need is a poster of Bush and the words Vote Democrat on it and you will win.

Didn't they try essentially try this in 2004? "Look, I'm not Bush!" seemed to be Kerry's campaign slogan, and it didn't work out to well. What the democrats need are viable candidates, not absolute jokes.

 
What America needs is to stop listening to Fox "news" and the ranting lies of the current "leadership".

The republicans went into their convention promising a serious discussion of the issues. What America got was a three days of Democrat bashing. Now we have the same party that told us what a failure the Democrats would be failing historically on every issue you can think of.

Do you think that perhaps America was duped? Why DIDN'T the republicans discuss the issues? The answer to that question is abundantly apparent in every aspect of federal governance today, from the debacle in Iraq to the illegal immigrant invasion to domestic spying. If the republicans discussed the issues instead of playing to the juvenile preconcepts of Americans who are now too damn dumb to see what's right in front of their eyes they wouldn't have "won" that election.

Or maybe they would have. We're living in an "American Idol" society. Most Americans wouldn't know how to understand the issues even if they were, by some miracle, honestly addresses by the bush republicans.
 
Originally posted by: BBond
Democratic Party leaders in Vermont on Saturday passed a motion asking Congress to immediately begin impeachment proceedings against President Bush.

YES! AT LEAST SOMEBODY GETS IT!

Followed by criminal proceedings for this entire corrupt administration.

I think people are finally getting it, that's why Bush's numbers are down and why this issue is finally getting the national attention it deserves.

Of course, Bush probably has an executive order out that says he can't be impeached so it's all a moot point.
 
Originally posted by: Unheard
Good luck with that guys, it aint gonna happen.

Originally posted by: techs
While it COULD happen next year if the Democrats take Congress it is far more likely that Democrats would rather have Bush in office during the next Presidential campaign.
After all, all you will need is a poster of Bush and the words Vote Democrat on it and you will win.

Didn't they try essentially try this in 2004? "Look, I'm not Bush!" seemed to be Kerry's campaign slogan, and it didn't work out to well. What the democrats need are viable candidates, not absolute jokes.

What are you talking about? Kerry's "I'm not Bush" campaign (if that was really his message) resulted in one of the closest elections in recent history (other than Bush's popular vote loss in 2000, you have to go back to the 70s to find a closer one). And that was back when Bush was semi-popular, with everything that's happened since the 2004 elections, his approval rating is in the tank now. Kerry's strategy would have worked today, and I see no reason it won't work for future Democrats.
 
Originally posted by: Rainsford
What are you talking about? Kerry's "I'm not Bush" campaign (if that was really his message) resulted in one of the closest elections in recent history (other than Bush's popular vote loss in 2000, you have to go back to the 70s to find a closer one). And that was back when Bush was semi-popular, with everything that's happened since the 2004 elections, his approval rating is in the tank now. Kerry's strategy would have worked today, and I see no reason it won't work for future Democrats.

One reason is that Bush won't be running so that message "I'm not Bush" wont matter as much.


 
The only motion that will matter is election come November 06---over six months away.
Lots of new and old problems and issues to spin before the election comes. With a very high probaibility that something will come that will totally sink Bush and the repubs before then.
 
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Rainsford
What are you talking about? Kerry's "I'm not Bush" campaign (if that was really his message) resulted in one of the closest elections in recent history (other than Bush's popular vote loss in 2000, you have to go back to the 70s to find a closer one). And that was back when Bush was semi-popular, with everything that's happened since the 2004 elections, his approval rating is in the tank now. Kerry's strategy would have worked today, and I see no reason it won't work for future Democrats.

One reason is that Bush won't be running so that message "I'm not Bush" wont matter as much.
If a Congressperson is the Republican nominee they will have undoubtedly voted for every single one of Bushes schemes. I don't see how they can run away from that one.
Even McCain who is seen as maverick will be sadled with a 97 percent pro-Bush vote history.


 
Originally posted by: techs
Originally posted by: GroundedSailor
Originally posted by: Rainsford
What are you talking about? Kerry's "I'm not Bush" campaign (if that was really his message) resulted in one of the closest elections in recent history (other than Bush's popular vote loss in 2000, you have to go back to the 70s to find a closer one). And that was back when Bush was semi-popular, with everything that's happened since the 2004 elections, his approval rating is in the tank now. Kerry's strategy would have worked today, and I see no reason it won't work for future Democrats.

One reason is that Bush won't be running so that message "I'm not Bush" wont matter as much.
If a Congressperson is the Republican nominee they will have undoubtedly voted for every single one of Bushes schemes. I don't see how they can run away from that one.
Even McCain who is seen as maverick will be sadled with a 97 percent pro-Bush vote history.

Indeed. I actually find it very telling that a lot of Republicans are seemingly starting to think for themselves and NOT agree with every word out of Bush's mouth. They clearly see the pitfall of running in 2006 as a yes-man for the Bush administration, and are trying to back away from that image. But it might be a case of too little, too late, as it's been 6 years since Bush came into office, and it's ONLY since he's become less than popular that Republicans are trying out that big mass between their ears.

Personally I think being exactly that kind of tool has sunk McCain. Oddly enough, he USED to be fairly independent, and only recently has he become one of the leading brown-nosers for the administration. Which I'm sure is a result of his needing wide Republican approval to get the Presidential nomination he's probably trying for in 2008, but his relentless sucking up is going to sink whatever chance he would have had.
 
If high crimes and misdemeanors warrant impeachment, then let?s do it. IMO, the democrats will make noise about it but not even come close to pulling the trigger, though. After all, considering THEIR historical behavior when it comes to BS "wars", why would they want to set a standard for the treatment of a president who lies us into needless imperial adventures?
 
Back
Top