Originally posted by: ScottSwingleComputers
I definately would. Who could refuse 1800 free income.
I have a family member who was offered the same thing, similiar amount of money. She said no, because she didn't want to see the tower. So, verizon went across the street to her neighbor, and put the tower about 100 feet away from where they originally wanted to put it on her property. Now she gets to look at it, and not get any money for it.
How this relates to your sister? Verizon is going to go to the neighbor, and they'll have a tower next to them anyways, so whether there are health risks or not, they will be in the same situation. May as well get paid for it.
Quoted and bolded for all the morons with zero reading comprehension around here. :roll:Originally posted by: GeekDrew
I live in the country... farmers *love* it when companies want to put cell towers on their land. It just means money rolling in, with no real negative.
Cell towers generate very little traffic - maintenance men & inspectors, on occasion. Nothing big. I'm assuming that land value drops in some areas - but around here, there doesn't seem to be any negativity in regards to purchasing land with a tower on it.
However - many people have been screwed out of having towers on their property because they did not accept the first offer - my uncle was one of those people. Some company (either Verizon or Cingular) asked my uncle if they could build a tower on top of one of his hills - they said that it would be the most ideal place around... I think that they were going to give him $1700 / month. He asked them if it would be possible to also have a free cellphone for him and his wife - and that was apparently enough of a debate to make them stop considering his farm -- they went with the next door neighbor's farm, even though they admitted that the conditions were not as favorable on the neighbor's farm. My uncle was pissed off at himself for not accepting their first offer.
Originally posted by: JDMnAR1
Not sure if this has been mentioned, but it might be worth checking into either building the tower yourself and leasing space to other carriers, or having the contract drawn up where they can't sublease space on the tower to other carriers. If you can retain ownership of the tower and/or leasing rights, it has the potential to be much more than $1800/mo worth of income. Of course, that would also be more hassle for you.
Originally posted by: JBT
A guess a couple of weeks ago Verizon offered my sister about $1800 per month to build a cell phone tower on her land.
My sister, her boy friend, and their baby bought this house sometime last year. Its a nice little place located on the Connecticut river valley in Walpole NH. Its very rural in this area, and very beautiful.
Shes got probably 3.5 acres of land up there and they are sort of Hippies/Granolas.
They are both pretty apprehensive about doing this.
They are concered with the possible health risks there might be and Verizon says they might also let others in the area lease the use of the tower as well. So there would be be a significant increase in traffic on her dirt road which I belive she is the only house on. I also think Verizon said something about helping to maintain their road in the winter months as it can get in pretty rough shape.
What do you guys think? Would you let Verizon do this?
I'm pretty sure I would. $1800 a month is a pretty significant amount of money esspecially for them. But possible health risks and possibley having their beautiful view destroyed would suck too.
Originally posted by: Winchester
That is above average. It is usually $1000-1200.
<-- Used to work for a cell phone company.
Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: Winchester
That is above average. It is usually $1000-1200.
<-- Used to work for a cell phone company.
Really? cool! I have 5 acres how do I pimp my land out and jump on this gravy train?![]()
Originally posted by: necine
I'd accept verizons offer. Rent the house out. And then move to a different house.