According to this article:
What is it about double-sided DIMMS that cause then to have to be run at 2T. The trace lengths can't be much longer. How about power consumption, does a double-sided 512 DIMM need more power than a single-sided 512 DIMM? Help me understand.
I'm a little frustrated because I have some Mushkin Blue double-sided 2x512 sticks and I thought if I upgraded to the Venice core I could get another pair without penalty. Now it doesn't look like that will happen. Also it seems to me most memory that I've seen is double-sided so the Venice core "four DIMM fix" seems hollow.
AMD engineers promised to eliminate this problem in the new Venice core and they did keep their word. Athlon 64 processors based on Venice can work with four single-side DDR400 SDRAM modules without any limitations, and if there are double-side DDR400 SDRAM DIMMs installed, they can work at 400MHz with 2T timing.
What is it about double-sided DIMMS that cause then to have to be run at 2T. The trace lengths can't be much longer. How about power consumption, does a double-sided 512 DIMM need more power than a single-sided 512 DIMM? Help me understand.
I'm a little frustrated because I have some Mushkin Blue double-sided 2x512 sticks and I thought if I upgraded to the Venice core I could get another pair without penalty. Now it doesn't look like that will happen. Also it seems to me most memory that I've seen is double-sided so the Venice core "four DIMM fix" seems hollow.