Variation in GPU work units

tontod

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,244
0
71
I'm getting a pretty big variation in GPU work units. In the last successful run, WU's were being completed in 25-30 min with a Radeon 3450, however, with the new WU, its taking 50-55 min. When this happens, usually the deadline for the WU passes before its completed. Do I need to adjust the parameters to only allow smaller WU's?
 

Philippart

Golden Member
Jul 9, 2006
1,290
0
0
they have small and large proteins, your gpu is really about the weakest I would run folding on. The only thing you can do is experiment with the environment variables, mainly FLUSH_INTERVAL. foldingforum.org gives you a lot of info on how to use these variables!
 

tontod

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,244
0
71
Yeah, I think running with FLUSH_INTERVAL of 16 has worked so far, works fine on a small protein. So, does a slow GPU "weigh down" a CPU?
 

Philippart

Golden Member
Jul 9, 2006
1,290
0
0
What is your gpu usage and what's your cpu usage from the gpu client. the gpu only makes your points per day worse if it uses more than 5% cpu usage and takes this way the processing power away from the smp/cpu client.
 

GLeeM

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2004
7,199
128
106
Originally posted by: tontod
however, with the new WU, its taking 50-55 min. When this happens, usually the deadline for the WU passes before its completed.

I don't see any WUs that have less than 1.0 day for a Preferred deadline.

What makes you think that the deadline is past?
 

tontod

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,244
0
71
Originally posted by: GLeeM
Originally posted by: tontod
however, with the new WU, its taking 50-55 min. When this happens, usually the deadline for the WU passes before its completed.

I don't see any WUs that have less than 1.0 day for a Preferred deadline.

What makes you think that the deadline is past?

I see the message in the log file:

Unit 5's deadline (September 26 03:12) has passed.
[03:36:28] Going to interrupt core and move on to next unit...
[03:36:29] Got kill signal -- issuing INTERRUPTED core shutdown
 

GLeeM

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2004
7,199
128
106
And this is happening after 55 minutes?

What is the Project number?

It should look something like this in the log:

[01:01:37] Project: 5767 (Run 5, Clone 67, Gen 1119)

You can look here to see deadlines, points and other info on WUs.
 

tontod

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,244
0
71
Originally posted by: GLeeM
And this is happening after 55 minutes?

What is the Project number?

It should look something like this in the log:

[01:01:37] Project: 5767 (Run 5, Clone 67, Gen 1119)

You can look here to see deadlines, points and other info on WUs.

It happened after getting to 83% :|

Project info:
Project: 5735 (Run 3, Clone 105, Gen 285)

Looking at that site, looks like I wont finish the current WU (Project 5736), guess I'll just kill it now and obtain a new WU. Also, with my other rig that has the Radeon 3450, its running Project 5738, with a max deadline of 3 days.
 

FaaR

Golden Member
Dec 28, 2007
1,056
412
136
Maybe you're better off simply replacing that videocard; fact is the ATI client is woefully underdeveloped despite ATI were the ones who originally pioneered GPGPU applications...

If money (or rather, lack thereof) is a problem, maybe you should just quit folding on your GPU if it just causes a lot of thrown-away work units. It would save electricity on your side, and network bandwidth and server capacity on the Stanford end...
 

tontod

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,244
0
71
Yeah, I was thinking of buying a new video card. I have an Optiplex 960, and from earlier posts, determined that a 1 GB GTS 250 card should work with the existing PS. Hopefully no WU's will be lost with that card.
 

GLeeM

Elite Member
Apr 2, 2004
7,199
128
106
Originally posted by: tontod
Originally posted by: theAnimal
So are you getting frame times of 55 minutes?

Yes I am.

Yikes! I thought you meant 55 minutes for the whole WU :confused:

My GTX275 finishes a 353 point WU in less than 55 minutes :D

A 250 shouldn't be too far behind that, should it?. Although I saw someone had one of those OCed to 1900+ on the shaders :shocked: Is that normal and can a GTX275 do the same?
 

tontod

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
3,244
0
71
Originally posted by: GLeeM
Originally posted by: tontod
Originally posted by: theAnimal
So are you getting frame times of 55 minutes?

Yes I am.

Yikes! I thought you meant 55 minutes for the whole WU :confused:

My GTX275 finishes a 353 point WU in less than 55 minutes :D

A 250 shouldn't be too far behind that, should it?. Although I saw someone had one of those OCed to 1900+ on the shaders :shocked: Is that normal and can a GTX275 do the same?

Actually, 1% was taking me 55 min. so it was crossing the deadline in most cases before it got to 100% :(
 

TonyH

Elite Member
Administrator
Jan 20, 2000
3,979
11
91
Originally posted by: tontod
Actually, 1% was taking me 55 min. so it was crossing the deadline in most cases before it got to 100% :(
Ouch!! :p Definitely time to upgrade. Even my dated 8800s aren't taking any more than 8 or 9 minutes a frame on the largest WUs for GPUs.