• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

V3, 510, m4, 310 high and med capacties compared

S

sticks435

Senior member
Hey all, saw this link over at vr-zone. It's in French, but the translated conclusion is below. Figured it would tide us over until Anand gets his up.

http://translate.google.com.sg/tran...rucial-m4-ocz-vertex-3-intel-ssd-510-320.html

There conclusion was that the m4 was the drive to get, as it's cheaper, has more capacity, and has the highest random reads and is tied for highest random write. The poor performance of the 120 V3 kept it from taking the top spot it appears.
 
I read it this morning and wasn't really surprised by any of it... except for one thing.

The Ramdisk offered 5-15% increase in performance over SSDs, despite being 10x times as fast. It's really looking like with modern SSDs, we've effectively closed the bottleneck that exists between CPU and storage. It also suggests that SSDs are about as good at general OS tasks as they'll ever get.

Translation: Go get an SSD. Any one will do.
 
with the Sandforce controller now dropping performance for it's mid sized capacity drives.. all these bench wars will now have dedicated weight classes.

And considering that all the other controllers drop performance(as always) when going down the capacity ladder?... I'm guessing the V3 will still be at the top of its weight class. We'll soon see when more accurate capacity matched testing is done.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top