- Jul 27, 2020
- 24,193
- 16,871
- 146

Controversial benchmarking website goes behind paywall — Userbenchmark now requires a $10 monthly subscription
That's a shame.

Last ditch effort to pretend he has something of value to offer
Get subsidies from the gubmint, and get subsidies from the end user.
I haven't used it in at least a few years now, but 3dMark and PCMark are no longer free either, or at least not current versions. It use to be just the "Pro" versions with extra features unlocked that cost anything. Now the only free downloadables are older versions. They aren't expensive, but still...
Do you think there's anyone sad or deluded enough to actually pay for a subscription?
I always run 3DMark when I slap together a build to play with. It was $5 on a Steam sale. It's a quick and easy means to know If the CPU or GPU are performing properly if there are enough database entries for the hardware. When there are not enough results for comparison, the stress tests suffice for ensuring the new stuff isn't nerfed.IMHO 3DMark hasn't been relevant in almost 20 years.
IMHO 3DMark hasn't been relevant in almost 20 years.
3dmark doesn't pretend to be anything. They make a pretty scene, it runs, it provides metrics. Whatcha See is Whatcha Get (Song by The Dramatics)
Userbenchmark is more like This is what you want, this is what you get. (song by Public Image Ltd)
Edit: Extreme overclockers seem to think it's relevant as they risk high value hardware just to top it.
Why? They provide a baseline repeatable operation. Moreover their simplicity makes them inheritly cross platform.I grew to dislike synthetic becnmarks.