• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Use Premium Gasoline for Maximum Performance

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I think it's funny you think they should consider a particular state when they make a car that is sold worldwide. Laugh all you want, but it's not Mazda's problem that some places don't have 93. Please don't act like this is the first performance car that requires 93.

LMAO @ Cali people who think their state is the end all, be all of states. If your state is so good, why is everything over there such a PITA? You can't mod cars without getting in trouble can you? How about that whole CARB thing? I think it's pretty sad that aftermarket parts meed to go through expensive testing just to get "approved" for use in Cali.

Regardless, they only make 5k of them a year, and most people have no idea what they are since Mazda did zero advertising for them, so it's fine by me if they don't sell over there.

Considering that "single state" is one of the largest economies in the world just by itself, you'd think that they would do a bit more research, yes.
 
Originally posted by: jagec
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I think it's funny you think they should consider a particular state when they make a car that is sold worldwide. Laugh all you want, but it's not Mazda's problem that some places don't have 93. Please don't act like this is the first performance car that requires 93.

LMAO @ Cali people who think their state is the end all, be all of states. If your state is so good, why is everything over there such a PITA? You can't mod cars without getting in trouble can you? How about that whole CARB thing? I think it's pretty sad that aftermarket parts meed to go through expensive testing just to get "approved" for use in Cali.

Regardless, they only make 5k of them a year, and most people have no idea what they are since Mazda did zero advertising for them, so it's fine by me if they don't sell over there.

Considering that "single state" is one of the largest economies in the world just by itself, you'd think that they would do a bit more research, yes.

Considering that the whole hotrod, modified cars, drag racing scene pretty much started in California I think we get by just fine with the whole CARB rating.

My 418hp '03 Cobra gets by just fine on 91 octane.

If you own a car that does not need a higher octane gasoline and you use a high octane gas it in, you will most likely see a loss in performance and gas mileage. Higher octane gas is harder to detonate therefor the car that runs on 87 will have a harder time detonating all the fuel which will result in a loss of performance and wasted fuel.
 
Originally posted by: I Saw OJ

Considering that the whole hotrod, modified cars, drag racing scene pretty much started in California I think we get by just fine with the whole CARB rating.

My 418hp '03 Cobra gets by just fine on 91 octane.

I'm sure it does, but that is a COMPLETELY different motor with different fuel requirements..

*sigh*
 
Originally posted by: Slackware
Where i live the octane is in four steps 95,96 98 and 120 top fuel.

the first three are all regular and it makes no 10-20 if your car isn't a top fuel dragster.

It really depends on the car. The MS6 over there is detuned and sold as the MPS, but I think that is mostly due to the tighter emissions restrictions...

 
Originally posted by: jagec

Considering that "single state" is one of the largest economies in the world just by itself, you'd think that they would do a bit more research, yes.

You pretty much ignored my post. It's not my fault you state considers 91 to be "premium", and the MS6 will run fine on 91 octane, just not have full power.

I'm glad your state is so cool, but guess what....there are 48 others too.

:roll:

 
Originally posted by: bob4432


not familiar with newer technology like that, so what does the compression ration come out to with a 9.5:1 starting and then putting in 17#s of boost, one would think the compression ratio would still be the same...wonder how they handle the detonation on just 93 octane. engine technology has come a long way since i was wrenching on them....but i guess it works since i think i read that those little mazdspeed 6 put out like 270HP and the subaru impreza's are ~300HP....not bad for such small engines.

The compression ratio is directly affected by manifold pressure. The more boost you run, the higher your actual ratio in-cylinder. I forget the math, but IIRC #17kbs of boost is going to increase compression quite a bit, up into the low teens I'd imagine. Premium fuel does quite a bit to control detonation compared to regular, but even with bad fuel your anti-knock sensor will save your arse.
 
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: TheSlammaLOL...

For every 2000~ft of altitude due to less air density you can lower the octaine by 1... being as Denver is 5280ft it's not quite 3.
Not so for turbocharged/supercharged engines. Because of the forced induction they will have exactly the same cylinder pressures as they have at sea level.

ZV

It's not exactly the same, since the boost is the manifold pressure over the ambient pressure, not absolute pressure. That's the difference between psia (ambient) and psig (gauge).

If it was exactly the same, turbocharged cars wouldn't lose power with altitude, but they do. Not as much as NA cars, though.

Here's a post I wrote about it on a car forum. The thread was on correction factors, and I was showing them how the same correction factor cannot be applied to a turbo car and a NA car. I used a car running 19 psi boost as an example.

NA car= (atmospheric)

Turbo = (atmospheric+boost)

So at sea level you have:

NA car= (14.7) total of 14.7 psi

Turbo= (14.7 + 19) total of 33.7 psi

We're using sea level as the baseline, so at sea level you both have 100% of your power.

Now in Denver, at 5280 feet, the atmospheric pressure is 12.3 psi. So we have:

NA car= (12.3) total of 12.3 psi, 83.6% of what he had at sea level.
Turbo = (12.3+19) total of 31.3 psi, 92.8% of what you had at sea level.

So if you both had 500 hp at sea level, in Denver the NA car now has 418 hp and you now have 464 hp.

Since the boost level is added on top of the atmospheric pressure and remains constant regardless of altitude, the more boost you run the less altitude will affect you.

Quick comparison at Denver's altitude with a NA car, car running 5 psi, a car running 10 psi, and a car running 20 psi:

NA car = (12.3) total of 12.3 psi, 83.6% of sea level

5 psi turbo =(12.3+5) total of 17.3 psi, 87.8% of sea level

10 psi turbo=(12.3+10) total of 22.3 psi, 90.2% of sea level

20 psi turbo=(12.3+20) total of 32.3 psi, 93% of sea level.

 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: TheSlammaLOL...

For every 2000~ft of altitude due to less air density you can lower the octaine by 1... being as Denver is 5280ft it's not quite 3.
Not so for turbocharged/supercharged engines. Because of the forced induction they will have exactly the same cylinder pressures as they have at sea level.

ZV

It won't be exactly the same, since the boost is the manifold pressure over ambient pressure. If it was exactly the same, turbocharged cars wouldn't lose power with altitude, but they do. Not as much as NA cars, though.


Isn't 17psi the same everywhere?
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: TheSlammaLOL...

For every 2000~ft of altitude due to less air density you can lower the octaine by 1... being as Denver is 5280ft it's not quite 3.
Not so for turbocharged/supercharged engines. Because of the forced induction they will have exactly the same cylinder pressures as they have at sea level.

ZV

It won't be exactly the same, since the boost is the manifold pressure over ambient pressure. If it was exactly the same, turbocharged cars wouldn't lose power with altitude, but they do. Not as much as NA cars, though.


Isn't 17psi the same everywhere?

When talking about cars, no it's not, since you're adding a constant pressure (boost) on top of a pressure that varies with altitude (atmospheric pressure). So a car with its boost gauge set to 17 psi will have a higher manifold pressure at sea level than it will at higher altitudes.

I added more to my post above, that will explain what I'm talking about.
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Originally posted by: TheSlammaLOL...

For every 2000~ft of altitude due to less air density you can lower the octaine by 1... being as Denver is 5280ft it's not quite 3.
Not so for turbocharged/supercharged engines. Because of the forced induction they will have exactly the same cylinder pressures as they have at sea level.

ZV

It won't be exactly the same, since the boost is the manifold pressure over ambient pressure. If it was exactly the same, turbocharged cars wouldn't lose power with altitude, but they do. Not as much as NA cars, though.


Isn't 17psi the same everywhere?

When talking about cars, no it's not, since you're adding a constant pressure (boost) on top of a pressure that varies with altitude (atmospheric pressure). So a car with its boost gauge set to 17 psi will have a higher manifold pressure at sea level than it will at higher altitudes.

I added more to my post above, that will explain what I'm talking about.


I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create, thus at higher altitude they would just not waste as much pressure. This actually makes aircraft more effecient and powerful at higher altitudes.

I could understand your reasoning if your induction system was working at maximum capacity at sea level, but if they were there would be no need for wastegates.
 
Originally posted by: Thorny

I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create, thus at higher altitude they would just not waste as much pressure. This actually makes aircraft more effecient and powerful at higher altitudes.

I could understand your reasoning if your induction system was working at maximum capacity at sea level, but if they were there would be no need for wastegates.

Nope. The wastegate is on the other side of the turbo- the turbine side instead of the compressor side.

Wastegates don't prevent you from wasting pressure, they're just a valve that modulates the turbine speed by letting exhaust bypass the turbine.
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Thorny

I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create, thus at higher altitude they would just not waste as much pressure. This actually makes aircraft more effecient and powerful at higher altitudes.

I could understand your reasoning if your induction system was working at maximum capacity at sea level, but if they were there would be no need for wastegates.

Nope. The wastegate is on the other side of the turbo.

Wastegates don't prevent you from wasting pressure, they're just a valve that modulates the turbine speed by letting exhaust bypass the turbine.


They modulate the turbines speed to limit the pressure created in the manifold. If a wastegate failed to function the turbo would create too much pressure in the manifold and cause engine damage. It is a fact that aircraft are more powerful at higher altitude due to higher efficiency of thier turbo, how is this untrue for an automobile?

Edit: I'm realize I'm randomly interchanging supercharger and turbocharger terminology and process, but it really makes no difference in this case.
 
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Thorny

I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create, thus at higher altitude they would just not waste as much pressure. This actually makes aircraft more effecient and powerful at higher altitudes.

I could understand your reasoning if your induction system was working at maximum capacity at sea level, but if they were there would be no need for wastegates.

Nope. The wastegate is on the other side of the turbo.

Wastegates don't prevent you from wasting pressure, they're just a valve that modulates the turbine speed by letting exhaust bypass the turbine.


They modulate the turbines speed to limit the pressure created in the manifold. If a wastegate failed to function the turbo would create too much pressure in the manifold and cause engine damage. It is a fact that aircraft are more powerful at higher altitude due to higher efficiency of thier turbo, how is this untrue for an automobile?


In your previous post, you said "I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create". This is impossible, since the wastegate is on the turbine side, not the compressor side.

Of course the turbo makes cars more powerful at higher altitudes. I'm not arguing against that, and in fact I explained it in a previous post on this thread.

Maybe I'm just misunderstanding what you're trying to say. If so, I didn't mean to offend you.
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Thorny
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Thorny

I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create, thus at higher altitude they would just not waste as much pressure. This actually makes aircraft more effecient and powerful at higher altitudes.

I could understand your reasoning if your induction system was working at maximum capacity at sea level, but if they were there would be no need for wastegates.

Nope. The wastegate is on the other side of the turbo.

Wastegates don't prevent you from wasting pressure, they're just a valve that modulates the turbine speed by letting exhaust bypass the turbine.


They modulate the turbines speed to limit the pressure created in the manifold. If a wastegate failed to function the turbo would create too much pressure in the manifold and cause engine damage. It is a fact that aircraft are more powerful at higher altitude due to higher efficiency of thier turbo, how is this untrue for an automobile?


In your previous post, you said "I was under the impression that FI cars wastegated the extra pressure they create". This is impossible, since the wastegate is on the turbine side, not the compressor side.

Of course the turbo makes cars more powerful at higher altitudes. I'm not arguing against that, and in fact I explained it in a previous post on this thread.

Maybe I'm just misunderstanding what you're trying to say. If so, I didn't mean to offend you.


You said that turbo's create less power at higher altitude, which is not correct. Turbos do wastegate excess pressure, exhaust pressure. Exhaust pressure directly affects intake pressure, so it's all the same whether I phrased it correctly or not, which I admit I did not.


Edit: FWIW, I was thinking of a blow off valve when I said wastegate earlier, which does disperse excess manifold pressure. It's late, I'm tired and my brains not running at 100%. Could be my wastegate's stuck open 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: FoBoT
marketing BS

What's marketing BS?

I love when people who don't know what they are talking about post like they do...

http://www.edmunds.com/advice/fueleconomy/articles/106293/article.html

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/autos/octane.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2003-07-30-premiumgas_x.htm

http://www.straightdope.com/columns/041008.html


Nice linkage. Thanks for that!
 
Originally posted by: Thorny

You said that turbo's create less power at higher altitude, which is not correct. Turbos do wastegate excess pressure, exhaust pressure. Exhaust pressure directly affects intake pressure, so it's all the same whether I phrased it correctly or not, which I admit I did not.

Turbos do create less power at higher altitude. From my earlier post:

NA car= (atmospheric)

Turbo = (atmospheric+boost)

So at sea level you have:

NA car= (14.7) total of 14.7 psi

Turbo= (14.7 + 19) total of 33.7 psi

We're using sea level as the baseline, so at sea level you both have 100% of your power.

Now in Denver, at 5280 feet, the atmospheric pressure is 12.3 psi. So we have:

NA car= (12.3) total of 12.3 psi, 83.6% of what he had at sea level.
Turbo = (12.3+19) total of 31.3 psi, 92.8% of what you had at sea level.

As you can see, the turbo car did lose power due to altitude, although not at the same rate as the NA car.

Originally posted by: Thorny
Edit: FWIW, I was thinking of a blow off valve when I said wastegate earlier, which does disperse excess manifold pressure. It's late, I'm tired and my brains not running at 100%. Could be my wastegate's stuck open 🙂

It's ok dude, I'm tired also.
 
I think what he was trying to say is the turbo will bleed off excess boost, and in a high altitude enviroment, it will not bleed off as much boost, so it keeps the boost at the same level as when it was at sea level...
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Wastegates don't prevent you from wasting pressure, they're just a valve that modulates the turbine speed by letting exhaust bypass the turbine.
Wastegates, at least most modern ones, are controlled by manifold pressure. That is, the wastegate opens at a specified manifold pressure. At higher altitudes, the wastegate will stay closed longer than at lower altitudes, resulting in less exhaust bleed-off from the turbine's hot side.

You're right that they bypass the turbine side and don't vent excess manifold pressure from the compressor, but they are controlled by that manifold pressure and absolutely will maintain the specified manifold pressure until the wastegate stays fully closed and can no longer compensate for the decreasing density of the air.

This is from experience with my 951, which runs a line from the manifold to a control valve on the wastegate. The line from the manifold is a trigger, and the control valve allows the wastegate to open only at a specified manifold pressure. The pressure of exhaust gasses against the valve is not sufficient to open it.

ZV
 
Originally posted by: Insane3D
I think what he was trying to say is the turbo will bleed off excess boost, and in a high altitude enviroment, it will not bleed off as much boost, so it keeps the boost at the same level as when it was at sea level...


The boost above atmospheric pressure will remain constant, but the atmospheric pressure itself decreases with altitude. Therefore your boost still won't be as high as it would be at sea level.

I explained it in my post above. I'm not sure why people keeping missing where I clearly explained this. I'll post it again. Example is a car running 19 psi:

NA car= (atmospheric)

Turbo = (atmospheric+boost)

So at sea level you have:

NA car= (14.7) total of 14.7 psi

Turbo= (14.7 + 19) total of 33.7 psi

We're using sea level as the baseline, so at sea level you both have 100% of your power.

Now in Denver, at 5280 feet, the atmospheric pressure is 12.3 psi. So we have:

NA car= (12.3) total of 12.3 psi, 83.6% of what he had at sea level.
Turbo = (12.3+19) total of 31.3 psi, 92.8% of what you had at sea level.


As you can see, while the psig has remained the same, the psia has decreased, therefore reducing the power output of the engine.
 
I understand what you are posting. I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that, depending on factors such as boost control, car, engine, ECU, etc, the car could compensate for the drop in atmospheric pressure by raising boost levels. For instance...you are at 17PSI at sea level, and it increases the boost to say 20PSI to compensate for the difference in atmospheric pressure at a higher altitude...

You are saying the boost level remains static...

What I'm taking about probably is more turbo specific...
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Example is a car running 19 psi:

NA car= (atmospheric)

Turbo = (atmospheric+boost)

So at sea level you have:

NA car= (14.7) total of 14.7 psi

Turbo= (14.7 + 19) total of 33.7 psi

We're using sea level as the baseline, so at sea level you both have 100% of your power.

Now in Denver, at 5280 feet, the atmospheric pressure is 12.3 psi. So we have:

NA car= (12.3) total of 12.3 psi, 83.6% of what he had at sea level.
Turbo = (12.3+19) total of 31.3 psi, 92.8% of what you had at sea level.


As you can see, while the psig has remained the same, the psia has decreased, therefore reducing the power output of the engine.
Except that the wastegate is controlled by absolute manifold pressure. Which means that, at altitude you have:

NA car: 12.3 psi total.
Turbo: (12.3 + 21.4) for a total of 33.7 PSI since the wastegate is not triggered to open until manifold pressure reaches an absolute pressure of 33.7 PSI.

ZV
 
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Except that the wastegate is controlled by absolute manifold pressure. Which means that, at altitude you have:

NA car: 12.3 psi total.
Turbo: (12.3 + 21.4) for a total of 33.7 PSI since the wastegate is not triggered to open until manifold pressure reaches an absolute pressure of 33.7 PSI.

ZV

This isn't the case for the vast majority of the turbocharged cars on the road here. I think yours may be different, though, since it's European. They tend to use BAR, which measures in absolute terms.

Does your boost gauge read in psi or bar? And is your wastegate controller by the input from the MAP sensor?
 
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Zenmervolt
Except that the wastegate is controlled by absolute manifold pressure. Which means that, at altitude you have:

NA car: 12.3 psi total.
Turbo: (12.3 + 21.4) for a total of 33.7 PSI since the wastegate is not triggered to open until manifold pressure reaches an absolute pressure of 33.7 PSI.

ZV

This isn't the case for the vast majority of the turbocharged cars on the road. I think yours may be different, though.

Does your car have a MAP sensor?

Mine does...
 
One of the problems is that many European cars use Bar instead of psi(g). At sea level with the cars off, the European car will show 1 bar, while the standard gauge will read 0. In Denver, the European Bar gauge will read less than 1 bar, while the standard gauge will still read 0.

From this site

BAR
An absolute scale, where 0.0 BAR is a vacuum and 1.01325 BAR is sea-level. The BAR scale is very common, especially on European cars. A BAR gauge is almost always an electronic instrument driven by the MAP (Manifold Absolute Pressure) sensor in your ECU. The MAP sensor has an absolute reference, usually an aneroid capsule, which allows it to determine the actual ambient pressure just as a barometer does.

If you drive well above sea level and turn an electronic BAR gauge on without starting the engine, you should see a value well below 1 (say about 0.84 in Denver).

psig

Pounds per Square Inch (gauge), the standard English pressure measurement, which is NOT absolute, but is relative to ambient atmospheric pressure. Most aftermarket mechanical boost gauges measure psig, so if you take this gauge to the moon and it will still read 0 when disconnected.



 
Back
Top