Originally posted by: us
it's the memory on the drive that's slow not the bus of the usb... usb1.1 can push 11?12?mbps.. which is around 1.375/1.5MB/s.... if you clock your usb drive it's nowhere near that
Originally posted by: DestruyaUR
I think given the choice I'd go with the uglier but cheaper one, just because it specifically says "no drivers required." So many people are mistakenly buying the first-gen keydrives and finding out they got a pre-ARM one that needs drivers and can't self-boot. The Cruzer looks like it's an ARM-equipped keydrive, but Sandisk COULD have gone with a smaller formfactor. I've seen SD-slot keys with smaller footprints - the Kanguru drive for one.
Also USB 2.0 keys are working their way onto the scene slowly but surely. Though the speeds are much higher, you're not going to get a massive speed boost out of them since they are passively-powered devices drawing juice from the USB port. Even so, 7MB/sec is many times faster than what a floppy is capable of.
For those interested in what a USB 2.0 keydrive is capable of: Link
Originally posted by: Jaxidian
I think I'm jumping all over that $90 one! The no-driver self-boot aspect is a MUST!!
![]()
Originally posted by: SleepyB
Originally posted by: Jaxidian
I think I'm jumping all over that $90 one! The no-driver self-boot aspect is a MUST!!
![]()
Where does it say it's self-boot? Do you mean that it can boot off the drive
like into DOS mode? That would be nice beacause I have a laptop with no
floppy or CD-ROM drives, and I have to boot from the network to reinstall
OSes....
This part of the description for the USBDrive 256 MB Portable USB Storage
Drive kinda scares me:
"Data Retention: Up to 10 years"
Up to? Eeekkk!!!! :Q