usb external much slower than internal HDD

dethman

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
10,263
3
76
my usb external 500gb is much slower than my internal drives, i know there should be a disparity, it's about 2-3x slower. my internal drive benches at around 60mb/sec peak, while usb is 20mb/sec.

to copy a 350mb file takes the internal about 7 sec, the usb around 18 seconds.

i know the usb 2.0 drivers are installed, and my other external 300gb drive with different enclosure also does the same. am i missing something?
 

dethman

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
10,263
3
76
there's TOO much of a disparity. usb 2.0 drives should run around 70-80% of internal speeds, but right now it's at around 30-40% which is very subpar.
 

Budman

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,980
0
0
Originally posted by: dethman
to copy a 350gb file takes the internal about 7 sec, the usb around 18 seconds.

holy ****** that's very fast. 350 gigs in 18 seconds??

that's very fast.
 

LOUISSSSS

Diamond Member
Dec 5, 2005
8,771
58
91
does your external have 2 x usb connectors for the pc? if yes, u should connect both as i read that both are used to transfer files and to supply hdd with power
 

dethman

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
10,263
3
76
Originally posted by: LOUISSSSS
does your external have 2 x usb connectors for the pc? if yes, u should connect both as i read that both are used to transfer files and to supply hdd with power

no, all enclosures i have seen have one. power is supplied by an ac adapter.
 

RebateMonger

Elite Member
Dec 24, 2005
11,586
0
0
I use a LOT of USB backup drives. I used to believe the estimates (26 Megabytes per second) about USB 2.0 speed. And I'd never actually TIMED any large backups. But recently I've actually timed some LARGE (300GB) backups, and found that USB 2.0 runs about 10 Megabytes per second when running Windows NTBackup. That's a LOT slower than internal IDE drives are capable of.

These numbers come from several Server 2003 servers with SCSI RAID 1 or RAID 5 drive arrays, USB 2.0 connections, and several brands of factory USB 2.0 drives. These were both typical system backups, and backing up large numbers of data files.
 

ForumMaster

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2005
7,792
1
0
well technically USB 2 is rated at 480Mbps which is 60MBps. say 45-55MB for best case. you say you're only getting 20MB? have you tried a different port? is it connected to a hub? try connecting directly to your computer.
 

dethman

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
10,263
3
76
Originally posted by: ForumMaster
well technically USB 2 is rated at 480Mbps which is 60MBps. say 45-55MB for best case. you say you're only getting 20MB? have you tried a different port? is it connected to a hub? try connecting directly to your computer.

no hubs. directly to the motherboard. i was expecting around 45MB/sec realistically. i'm running an abit nf7-s 2.0 so it's not a cheap motherboard issue. cpu utilization is only 4% so it's not that. i'm stumped.
 

w00t

Diamond Member
Nov 5, 2004
5,545
0
0
it's external even if you have usb 2.0 it's not going to be as fast as SATA or PATA
 

corkyg

Elite Member | Peripherals
Super Moderator
Mar 4, 2000
27,370
239
106
Typical maximum sustained data transfer rates:

USB 2.0 = 40 MBps
IDE PATA = 74 MBps

Both have higher burst rates. I would say that those opimum numbers are pretty close to 2X. There are variances in brands of drives.

Firewire will out perform USB 2 on a sustained data transfer basis.