Vesku
Diamond Member
- Aug 25, 2005
- 3,743
- 28
- 86
The irony here is that Intel likes to advertise their home-grown USB prowess, so borking their native USB3 implementation is kinda sad IMO.
But we have yet to see if this actually pans out as a practical concern for products that actually hit the market. AMD's TLB bug with Phenom wasn't a practical concern in the consumer space but AMD (over)reacted as if it were.
Intel still has time to fix this (if the rumor is even true), or they may elect to leave it as is just like they did with the 24fps "bug" in their integrated GPUs.
Wouldn't say AMD overreacted more that the desktop motherboard manufacturers chose to enable the fix by default. This in turn generated many metric tons of bad PR for AMD.
As for this USB3 thing, it's definitely a bit embarrassing just from the standpoint of having problems implementing your own technology standard. What I'm more interested in though, will this be fixed prior to launch. If it's not fixed will the issue be disclosed properly or will it be a repeat of missing virtualization features on early SB-E chips?
Last edited: