- Mar 28, 2005
- 7,164
- 0
- 0
So it looks like we have a treaty with Russia to reduce nuclear arsenals by 25%.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36050902/ns/world_news-europe/
I can see some value in this from the standpoint of improving our overall relations with Russia. However, I have never quite understood the point of nuclear arms reduction. It seems to me that reducing your arsenal to where you only have enough to blow up the world 50 times over instead of 70 times over doesn't really increase overall human security from nuclear weapons. Maybe the argument is that fewer nukes means it is less likely that the wrong people (i.e. terrorists) will some day get ahold of them?
Opinions?
- wolf
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36050902/ns/world_news-europe/
I can see some value in this from the standpoint of improving our overall relations with Russia. However, I have never quite understood the point of nuclear arms reduction. It seems to me that reducing your arsenal to where you only have enough to blow up the world 50 times over instead of 70 times over doesn't really increase overall human security from nuclear weapons. Maybe the argument is that fewer nukes means it is less likely that the wrong people (i.e. terrorists) will some day get ahold of them?
Opinions?
- wolf